Microbiome-preserving antibiotics for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Newer antibiotics that specifically target Clostridioides difficile while preserving the host microbiome have emerged to treat C. difficile infection (CDI): cadazolid, fidaxomicin, ridinilazole, and surotomycin. The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy for each antibiotic. METHODS: Only randomized clinical trials of patients being treated for Clostridioides disease infection were included. Studies were sought in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization clinical trials register portal (up to December 9, 2022). Sustained clinical cure was the outcome of treatment comparison, defined as the resolution of diarrhea without recurrence. Vancomycin was the standard treatment comparator. Meta-analysis was performed for each antibiotic. The overall certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE)-classified as either high, moderate, low, or very low. RESULTS: Fourteen eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis with 4837 patients from 773 sites. Cadazolid did not increase sustained clinical cure relative to vancomycin (risk ratio (RR) 1.04, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.96-1.13; moderate-certainty evidence). Fidaxomicin demonstrated a significant increase (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07-1.21; low-certainty evidence). In one phase 2 study, ridinilazole demonstrated a significant increase in sustained clinical cure (RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.01-2.91; very low-quality evidence). Surotomycin did not show significant improvement (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.96-1.14; moderate-certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS: Fidaxomicin (in seven studies) demonstrated significant improvement in achieving sustained clinical cure. A limitation of this study may that more studies are needed to compare fidaxomicin with other antibiotics.

Cardiovascular risk management in rheumatoid arthritis patients still suboptimal: the Implementation of Cardiovascular Risk Management in Rheumatoid Arthritis project.

Objective: To assess the 10-year cardiovascular (CV) risk score and to identify treatment and undertreatment of CV risk factors in patients with established RA. Methods: Demographics, CV risk factors and prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) were assessed by questionnaire. To calculate the 10-year CV risk score according to the Dutch CV risk management guideline, systolic blood pressure was measured and cholesterol levels were determined from fasting blood samples. Patients were categorized into four groups: indication for treatment but not treated; inadequately treated, so not meeting goals (systolic blood pressure ⩽140 mmHg and/or low-density lipoprotein ⩽2.5 mmol/l); adequately treated; or no treatment necessary. Results: A total of 720 consecutive RA patients were included, 375 from Reade and 345 from the Antonius Hospital. The mean age of patients was 59 years (s.d. 12) and 73% were female. Seventeen per cent of the patients had a low 10-year CV risk (<10%), 21% had an intermediate risk (10-19%), 53% a high risk (⩾20%) and 9% had CVD. In total, 69% had an indication for preventive treatment (cholesterol-lowering or antihypertensive drugs). Of those, 42% received inadequate treatment and 40% received no treatment at all. Conclusion: Optimal CV risk management remains a major challenge and better awareness and management are urgently needed to reduce the high risk of CVD in the RA population.