Ambulatory outpatient venous surgery service: An examination of patient satisfaction and experiences.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to ascertain patients' experience of the out-patient venous service being provided,; identify the level of patient satisfaction with the service and identify areas for further improvement and development. METHOD: A prospective descriptive quantitative study. A questionnaire was distributed to all patients who used the service between June 2017 and March 2018. A total of 195 questionnaires was distributed with 162 valid questionnaires returned; response rate of 83%. RESULTS: This study found high satisfaction levels with endovenous ablation procedures, with concomitant phlebectomy, in the ambulatory outpatient setting and patient experiences of the service are overwhelmingly positive. CONCLUSION: Study findings support the management of ambulatory outpatient varicose vein endovenous ablation procedures as a feasible alternative to day surgery theatre settings and is the blueprint for future management of varicose vein surgery in Ireland.

A Snapshot of Lymphedema in Ireland: Results from LIMPRINT.

Background: To estimate the prevalence and impact of chronic edema (CE) in two Irish health care settings as part of LIMPRINT, an international study developed and co-ordinated by the International Lymphoedema Framework (ILF), and researched in Ireland by the National Lymphoedema Framework Ireland (NLFI). Methods and Results: Data were collected using clinical assessment tools previously validated by the ILF. Three hospital settings were chosen, both an in-patient and out-patient oncology unit in Galway and a vascular out-patient unit in Dublin. Patients attending an oncology clinic or in an in-patient ward on a specified day were invited to participate as desired, and all patients attending vascular out-patients for a 4-week period were included in the study. All patients were assessed for the presence of CE, and if present, patients were asked to answer several questionnaires regarding diagnosis, available services, quality of life, and wound care where appropriate. The collection of data was anonymized and was inputted to a central database (Clindex). A total of 152 patients were assessed, 76 from the oncology service and 76 from the vascular service. Eighty-seven (57%) patients were female and 65 (43%) patients were male. The mean age was 65 years with a range 15-93 years. Twenty-five patients (16%) had CE, 8 (11%) in the oncology service and 17 (22%) in the vascular service. All the oncology patients were normal weight while almost 60% (n = 10) of the vascular patients were obese. Two (25%) of the oncology patients had a history of cellulitis, whereas seven (41%) of the vascular patients had a history of cellulitis. Four of the oncology patients (50%) received full lymphedema management whereas two oncology patients (20%) received no treatment at all. In contrast, in the vascular group, only two patients (12%) received full lymphedema management. Eight patients (47%) were receiving no treatment at all and seven (41%) were in compression garments and received skin care advice only. Conclusion: Though number of patients are small, these results highlight the high prevalence of CE in both oncology and vascular service patients as well as the disparities in management. In addition, there is a high incidence of cellulitis reported that is possibly not surprising given the low number of patients receiving full lymphedema care. Good data collection is essential if we are to provide and fund a comprehensive service in the future.

A National Survey Identifying the Factors Associated With Cardiovascular Care Nurses' Perceived Knowledge of International Practice Guidelines: The First Step in the Development of an Implementation Strategy.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of international guidelines within everyday practice remains problematic, which can have a detrimental impact on quality of care delivered. This study aimed to ascertain the factors associated with clinical nurses' perceived knowledge of international guidelines. METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey, nurses from 45 hospitals across Ireland were recruited. A previously validated anonymous questionnaire that assessed guideline knowledge, use, and barriers to implementation was used. Data were analyzed using SPSS 23 and logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 542 responses, 54% had used international guidelines relevant to their practice and 50% had consulted within the last year. Most nurses perceived that poor patient follow-up, lack of time and resources, poor clinical leadership, workload, long guidelines, and not understanding guideline detail were barriers to guideline use and implementation. Forty-five percent rated their perceived knowledge of guidelines as "low." Logistic regression identified that "high" knowledge levels were significantly associated with having read guidelines in the last year and their use with practice. In contrast, low knowledge of the guidelines was associated with perceptions that they were lengthy and not easy to use, lack of confidence to challenge colleagues when guidelines are not implemented, or not being able to influence current practice. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified the specific knowledge needs in this cohort of mainly basic grade registered nurses, with low perceived guideline knowledge. A whole unit or team approach led by nurse champions is needed to develop and establish practice and educational strategies that would increase the availability, application, and knowledge of guidelines within everyday practice.