Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Int J Clin Pract ; 60(1): 15-22, 2006 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16409423

ABSTRACT

This article reports quality of life (QoL) aspects of a study that investigated the efficacy of three treatment regimens in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients. Following a 4-week symptom-control phase (esomeprazole 40 mg once daily), patients were randomised to 6 months' esomeprazole 20 mg once daily continuously (n = 658), on-demand (n = 634) or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily continuously (n = 610). Esomeprazole 40 mg once daily improved QoL during the symptom-control phase. At 6 months, both esomeprazole regimens were more effective than ranitidine in all dimensions of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia questionnaire (p < 0.0001). Esomeprazole continuous and on-demand led to a significant improvement in symptoms (Overall Treatment Evaluation questionnaire) compared with ranitidine (continuous: 80.2%, on-demand: 77.8%, vs. ranitidine 47.0%; p < 0.001). Esomeprazole once daily continuously maintained QoL better than esomeprazole on-demand and was associated with greater patient satisfaction. In conclusion, esomeprazole 20 mg once daily continuously and on-demand were more effective than ranitidine continuously for maintaining QoL.


Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/administration & dosage , Esomeprazole/administration & dosage , Gastroesophageal Reflux/prevention & control , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Ranitidine/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Family Practice , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome
2.
Int J Clin Pract ; 59(6): 655-64, 2005 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15924593

ABSTRACT

This study assesses the difference in direct medical costs between on-demand treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg, continuous treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg once-daily and continuous treatment with ranitidine 150 mg twice-daily to prevent symptomatic relapse in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease over 26 weeks. Two hundred eighty-one GP clinics in Norway enrolled 2156 patients to an open, randomized, parallel group, Norwegian society perspective study during 2000-2001. The total direct medical costs of each strategy were 171.9 Euros for on-demand esomeprazole (n = 634), 221.6 Euros for ranitidine (n = 610) and 248.8 Euros for continuous esomeprazole (n = 658). The total costs for on-demand and continuous esomeprazole treatment and ranitidine treatment were 221.5, 286.5 and 295.8 Euros, respectively. The highest proportion of costs was because of the study medication cost in each strategy. The on-demand and continuous treatment strategies with esomeprazole were found to be cost-effective, compared with ranitidine.


Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/administration & dosage , Esomeprazole/administration & dosage , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Ranitidine/administration & dosage , Adult , Anti-Ulcer Agents/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Drug Costs , Esomeprazole/economics , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/economics , Humans , Long-Term Care , Male , Middle Aged , Norway , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Ranitidine/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...