Repetitive-sequence-based PCR using the DiversiLab system for identification of Aspergillus species.

Repetitive-sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) using the DiversiLab system was investigated for identification of Aspergillus. Ninety-five clinical isolates, identified by conventional methods, and five ATCC strains were tested. Sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) was performed on 2 isolates with discrepant rep-PCR and conventional results and 15 randomly selected outlier isolates. One isolate not identified by sequencing was excluded from analysis. After resolving discrepancies, all but one A. glaucus strain had >or=85% similarity to one or more strains of the same Aspergillus species in the mold database, thereby providing accurate identification. No isolate was misidentified.

Identification of Histoplasma capsulatum, Blastomyces dermatitidis, and Coccidioides species by repetitive-sequence-based PCR.

The performance of repetitive-sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) using the DiversiLab system for identification of Coccidioides species, Blastomyces dermatitidis, and Histoplasma capsulatum was assessed by comparing data obtained to colony morphology and microscopic characteristics and to nucleic acid probe results. DNA from cultures of 23 Coccidioides, 24 B. dermatitidis, 24 H. capsulatum, 3 Arthrographis, and 2 Malbranchea isolates was extracted using a microbial DNA isolation kit as recommended by Bacterial Barcodes, Inc. Rep-PCR and probe results agreed for 97.2% of the dimorphic fungi when > or =85% similarity was used as the criterion for identification. Two H. capsulatum isolates were not identified, but no isolates were misidentified. From 43 of those cultures (15 Coccidioides, 14 B. dermatitidis, 14 H. capsulatum, 3 Arthrographis, and 2 Malbranchea), DNA also was extracted using an IDI lysis kit, a simpler method. Rep-PCR and probe results agreed for 97.7% of the dimorphic fungi when a criterion of > or =90% similarity was used for identification. One H. capsulatum isolate could not be identified; no isolates were misidentified. Using > or =85% similarity for identification resulted in one misidentification. These data suggest that the DiversiLab system can be used to identify Coccidioides and B. dermatitidis and, possibly, H. capsulatum isolates.

Repetitive-sequence-PCR-based DNA fingerprinting using the Diversilab system for identification of commonly encountered dermatophytes.

The performance of repetitive-sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) using the DiversiLab system for identification of dermatophytes commonly isolated in a clinical laboratory was assessed by comparing results to those of conventional tests (colony morphology, microscopic examination of slide cultures, and, for suspected Trichophyton species, use of additional media). Sixty-one cultures were tested in phase 1, the feasibility portion of the study; 64 additional cultures were tested in phase 2, the validation portion conducted to assess reproducibility and confirm accuracy. Discrepancies were resolved by repeating rep-PCR and conventional tests and, in phase 2, sequencing the internal transcribed spacers. After initial testing of the cultures in phase 1 (excluding one contaminated culture), agreement between conventional tests and rep-PCR was 90% (54 of 60). Agreement was 98.3% after resolution of discrepancies, and in all but one case the initial rep-PCR result was correct. After initial testing of cultures in phase 2 (excluding one discarded and one contaminated culture), agreement between rep-PCR and conventional testing was 88.7% (55 of 62). After discrepancies were resolved, agreement was 100%. Initial rep-PCR results were correct, except for one Microsporum canis culture containing two colony variants, which could not be initially identified by rep-PCR. The performance of the DiversiLab system for identification of the dermatophytes commonly encountered in a clinical mycology laboratory-Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton tonsurans, and M. canis-was excellent. Moreover, the DiversiLab system is technically simple and provides results in < 24 h once a pure culture is available for testing, which is considerably more rapid than conventional identification tests.