Impact of COVID-19 Restrictions on Acute Gastroenteritis in Children: A Regional, Danish, Register-Based Study.

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) restrictions such as social distancing on the occurrence of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) among children. This study is a register-based study, including every child seen in the departments of paediatrics with the initial diagnosis of AGE in three neighbouring hospitals in Denmark, from March 2018 through February 2021. The study also included every positive stool sample for AGE-causing pathogens analysed in these three hospitals from children during the same period. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to determine differences between the period during the SARS-CoV-2 restrictions and before. In all, 222,157 children were seen in the three paediatric departments during this period. Of these, 3917 children were diagnosed with AGE. We found a decrease of 46.6% in AGE-related visits per month after the SARS-CoV-2 restrictions were introduced compared to before (p-value < 0.001). Positive stool samples decreased by 38.2% (p-value = 0.008) during the restrictions. This study found that cases of paediatric AGE decreased significantly the during COVID-19 restrictions, suggesting that studies should be conducted to determine whether this reduction was a result of good hand hygiene and social distancing or just a result of altered health-seeking behaviour among children.

Addition of point-of-care test reduces antibiotic prescription in hospitalised children with suspected respiratory tract infection: A pre-test-post-test study.

AIM: Prompt and accurate aetiological diagnostics are needed if physicians are to improve and target antibiotic treatment. We aimed to investigate whether antibiotic-prescribing decisions are improved with availability of point-of-care polymerase chain reaction (POC-PCR) diagnostic testing of children with suspected respiratory tract infection, and if it had an impact on referral for additional medical procedures. METHODS: This was a single-centre one-group pre-test-post-test study. Children visiting our paediatric department with respiratory tract infection symptoms were included if the treating paediatrician was considering an antibiotic prescription. Throat swabs were analysed for pathogens using POC-PCR. The paediatrician registered treatment decisions, referrals for additional procedures and decisions about hospitalisation into a questionnaire before and after receiving the POC-PCR results. RESULTS: We included 95 children. The availability of results from POC-PCR analysis significantly changed the prescribed antibiotic treatment to non-antibiotic treatment in 46% (36%-56%) of the children and the reverse in 2% (1%-8%). Paediatricians referred significantly fewer patients to additional medical procedures with availability of POC-PCR. CONCLUSION: POC-PCR significantly reduced the odds of antibiotic prescription and referral for additional medical procedures. Thus, POC-PCR presents an opportunity to improve antibiotic-prescribing practices if it is combined with standard clinical evaluation.

The danish regions pediatric triage model has a limited ability to detect both critically ill children as well as children to be sent home without treatment - a study of diagnostic accuracy.

BACKGROUND: The Danish Regions Pediatric Triage model (DRPT) was introduced in 2012 and subsequent implemented in most Danish acute pediatric departments. The aim was to evaluate the validity of DRPT as a screening tool to detect both the most serious acute conditions and the non-serious conditions in the acute referred patients in a pediatric department. METHOD: The study was prospective observational, with follow-up on all children with acute referral to pediatric department from October to December 2015. The DRPT was evaluated by comparison to a predefined reference standard and to the actual clinical outcomes: critically ill children and children returned to home without any treatment. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and likelihood for positive and negative test were calculated. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty children were included. The DRPT categorized 7% very urgent, 28% urgent, 29% standard and 36% non-urgent. The DRPT was equal to the reference standard in 31% of the children (CI: 27-35%). DRPT undertriaged 55% of the children (CI: 51-59%) and overtriaged 14% of the children (CI: 11-17%). For the most urgent patients the sensitivity of DRPT was 31% (CI: 20-48%) compared to the reference standard and 20% (CI: 7-41) for critically ill. For children with non-urgent conditions the specificity of DRPT was 66% (CI: 62-71%) compared to the reference standard and 68% (CI: 62-75%) for the children who went home with no treatment. In none of the analyses, the likelihood ratio of the negative test was less than 0.7 and the positive likelihood ratio only reached more than 5 in one of the analyses. DISCUSSION: This study is the first to evaluate the DRPT triage system. From the very limited validity studies of other well-established triage systems, it is difficult to judge whether the DRPT performs better or worse than the alternatives. The DRPT errs to the undertriage side. If the sensitivity is low, a number of the sickest children are undetected and this is a matter of concern. CONCLUSION: The DRPT is a triage tool with limited ability to detect the critically ill children as well as the children who can be returned to home without any treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant.