Links between celiac disease and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Symptoms of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and celiac disease (CeD) often overlap, and studies suggest a link between SIBO and CeD. We thus conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare SIBO prevalence in CeD patients and controls and assessed effects of antimicrobial therapy on gastrointestinal symptoms in SIBO positive CeD patients. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched until February 2022 for studies reporting SIBO prevalence in CeD. Prevalence rates, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of SIBO in CeD and controls were calculated. RESULTS: We included 14 studies, with 742 CeD patients and 178 controls. The pooled prevalence of SIBO in CeD was 18.3% (95% CI: 11.4-28.1), with substantial heterogeneity. Including case-control studies with healthy controls, SIBO prevalence in CeD patients was significantly increased (OR 5.1, 95% CI: 2.1-12.4, P = 0.0001), with minimal heterogeneity. Utilizing breath tests, SIBO prevalence in CeD patients was 20.8% (95% CI: 11.9-33.7), almost two-fold higher compared with culture-based methods at 12.6% (95% CI: 5.1-28.0), with substantial heterogeneity in both analyses. SIBO prevalence in CeD patients nonresponsive to a gluten free diet (GFD) was not statistically higher as compared with those responsive to GFD (OR 1.5, 95% CI: 0.4-5.0, P = 0.511). Antibiotic therapy of SIBO positive CeD patients resulted in improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms in 95.6% (95% CI: 78.0-99.9) and normalization of breath tests. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a link between SIBO and CeD. While SIBO could explain nonresponse to a GFD in CeD, SIBO prevalence is not statistically higher in CeD patients non-responsive to GFD. The overall quality of the evidence is low, mainly due to substantial "clinical heterogeneity" and the limited sensitivity/specificity of the available diagnostic tests.

Concomitant Irritable Bowel Syndrome Does Not Influence the Response to Antimicrobial Therapy in Patients with Functional Dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Antimicrobial therapy improves symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but the efficacy in functional dyspepsia (FD) is largely unknown. While FD and IBS frequently overlap, it is unknown if concomitant IBS in FD alters the response to antimicrobial therapy in FD. Thus, we aimed to assess and compare the effect of antimicrobial therapy on visceral sensory function and symptom improvement in FD patients with and without IBS. METHODS: Adult patients with FD with or without IBS received rifaximin 550 mg BD for 10 days, followed by a 6-week follow-up period. The total gastrointestinal symptom score as measured by the SAGIS (Structured Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms) questionnaire and subscores (dyspepsia, diarrhea, and constipation), symptom response to a standardized nutrient challenge and normalization of the glucose breath tests were measured. RESULTS: Twenty-one consecutive adult patients with FD and 14/21 with concomitant IBS were recruited. Treatment with rifaximin resulted in a significant (p = 0.017) improvement in the total SAGIS score from 34.7 (± 15.4) at baseline to 26.0 (± 16.8) at 2 weeks and 25.6 (± 17.8) at 6 weeks post-treatment. Similarly, compared to baseline there was a statistically significant improvement in SAGIS subscores for dyspepsia and diarrhea (all p < 0.05) and effects persisted for 6 weeks post-treatment. Similarly, the symptom score (and subscores) following a standardized nutrient challenge improved significantly (p < 0.001) 2 weeks post-treatment. The presence of concomitant IBS did not significantly influence the improvement of symptoms after antibiotic therapy (all p > 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: In FD patients, the response to antimicrobial therapy with rifaximin is not influenced by concomitant IBS symptoms.

Routine assessment of gastrointestinal symptom using a validated questionnaire in the clinical setting to assess the probability of organic or functional gastrointestinal diseases.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms can be challenging in terms of determining etiology and management strategies. Identifying likely organic pathology is important since it can be treated and may result in further, long-term harm to the patient if not treated. Currently, organic pathology is often identified via invasive procedures such as endoscopy or referral to a medical imaging service. We report on an approach that offers a first step at identifying patients with an organic gastrointestinal disease based on the SAGIS, a validated symptom questionnaire. METHODS: 8,922 patients referred to a tertiary care hospital were classified as having either functional gastrointestinal disease or an organic gastrointestinal disease. A model was developed to distinguish organic from functional symptoms on one random split half of the sample and validated on the other half. The incremental benefit of including psychological conditions and extra-gastrointestinal conditions was also evaluated. KEY RESULTS: Functional gastrointestinal patients scored higher on average than organic patients on all dimensions of the SAGIS and reported higher rates of psychological and extra-gastrointestinal conditions. All five dimensions of the SAGIS provided statistically independent discrimination of organic from functional diagnoses with good overall discrimination (AUC = 0.75). However, there was no noticeable incremental benefit of adding either psychological or extra-gastrointestinal conditions. Model performance was highly reproducible. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: The proposed algorithm for identifying likely organic gastrointestinal disease applied to symptoms as recorded in the SAGIS questionnaire provides a useful tool for the clinician in deciding what or if further diagnostic testing is required.