Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Healthc Q ; 20(2): 37-43, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28837013

ABSTRACT

A significant issue affecting the healthcare system across Ontario is the number of patients admitted to hospitals that are then subsequently being designated alternate level of care (ALC). In 2016, 14.5% of Ontario in-patient beds were occupied by ALC-designated patients. Contributing to this phenomenon are ethical errors that can affect decision-making around discharge. Since 2012, William Osler Health System has redesigned their discharge process to eliminate ethical errors and align more fully with the Health Care Consent Act (HCCA) and the Public Hospitals Act (PHA). Through quality improvement processes including the use of scripting, education, checklists, mentoring and role clarity, Osler's ALC days are currently the lowest in the province of Ontario. The elimination of such errors also decreased patient confusion and improved the discharge experience.


Subject(s)
Ethics, Institutional , Length of Stay , Patient Discharge/standards , Community Health Services , Decision Making/ethics , Home Care Services , Humans , Ontario , Patient Safety , Patient Transfer/ethics , Quality Improvement
2.
Healthc Q ; 16(4): 43-8, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24485243

ABSTRACT

Increased pressure on acute care hospitals to move patients seamlessly through the healthcare system has resulted in more attention to the process of discharging patients, particularly seniors, from hospitals. When alignment with the Health Care Consent Act is lacking, errors can occur in the process. Examples of mistakes by healthcare professionals include these: taking direction from the wrong substitute decision-maker (SDM); taking direction from a family member when the patient is capable; allowing an SDM to make an advance directive on behalf of a patient; being aware of a known prior expressed wish but ignoring that wish when considering a placement plan; waiting for an SDM who is not available, willing and capable instead of proceeding down the hierarchy of decision-makers; or permitting families to propose discharge plans. Such errors have the potential to compromise quality of care, but they also work to prevent timely and appropriate discharge. In order to minimize these common errors in the consent process for placements, we have proposed a checklist to help meet ethical and legal obligations in the discharge process. We suggest the checklist may minimize avoidable conflict and misunderstanding and promote a seamless discharge process.


Subject(s)
Medical Errors/prevention & control , Patient Discharge , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Checklist , Continuity of Patient Care/standards , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Hospitals/standards , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance/psychology , Patient Discharge/standards , Quality of Health Care/standards , Third-Party Consent
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...