Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
New Solut ; 31(2): 170-177, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33966529

ABSTRACT

Grocery store workers are essential workers, but often have not been provided with appropriate protection during the current pandemic. This report describes efforts made by one union local to protect workers, including negotiated paid sick leave and specific safety practices. Union representatives from 319 stores completed 1612 in-store surveys to assess compliance between 23 April 2020 and 31 August 2020. Employers provided the union with lists of workers confirmed to have COVID-19 infection through 31 December 2020. Worker infection rates were calculated using store employees represented by the union as the denominator and compared to cumulative county infection rates; outcome was dichotomized as rates higher or lower than background rates. Restrictions on reusable bags and management enforcement of customer mask usage were most strongly associated with COVID-19 rates lower than rates in the surrounding county. Stores that responded positively to worker complaints also had better outcomes. The union is currently engaging to promote improved ventilation and vaccination uptake.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Labor Unions/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Safety/legislation & jurisprudence , Supermarkets , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Vaccines , Female , Humans , Male , Occupations/legislation & jurisprudence , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Sick Leave/legislation & jurisprudence , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Ventilation/legislation & jurisprudence , Ventilation/standards
2.
Am J Pharm Educ ; 71(4): 67, 2007 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17786254

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To reevaluate facilitators of and barriers to pharmacists' participation in lifelong learning previously examined in a 1990 study. METHODS: A survey instrument was mailed to 274 pharmacists who volunteered to participate based on a prior random sample survey. Data based on perceptions of facilitators and barriers to lifelong learning, as well as self-perception as a lifelong learner, were analyzed and compared to a similar 1990 survey. RESULTS: The response rate for the survey was 88%. The top 3 facilitators and barriers to lifelong learning from the 2003 and the 1990 samples were: (1) personal desire to learn; (2) requirement to maintain professional licensure; and (3) enjoyment/relaxation provided by learning as change of pace from the "routine." The top 3 barriers were: (1) job constraints; (2) scheduling (location, distance, time) of group learning activities; and (3) family constraints (eg, spouse, children, personal). Respondents' broad self-perception as lifelong learners continued to be highly positive overall, but remained less positive relative to more specific lifelong learning skills such as the ability to identify learning objectives as well as to evaluate learning outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Little has changed in the last decade relative to how pharmacists view themselves as lifelong learners, as well as what they perceive as facilitators and barriers to lifelong learning. To address factors identified as facilitators and barriers, continuing education (CE) providers should focus on pharmacists' time constraints, whether due to employment, family responsibilities, or time invested in the educational activity itself, and pharmacists' internal motivations to learn (personal desire, enjoyment), as well as external forces such as mandatory CE for relicensure.


Subject(s)
Education, Pharmacy, Continuing/trends , Learning , Perception , Pharmacists/psychology , Pharmacists/trends , Data Collection/trends , Female , Humans , Male , Motivation
3.
Am J Pharm Educ ; 71(6): 121, 2007 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19503705

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To reevaluate and validate the use of a formula for calculating the amount of continuing education credit to be awarded for printed home study courses. METHODS: Ten home study courses were selected for inclusion in a study to validate the formula, which is based on the number of words, number of final examination questions, and estimated difficulty level of the course. The amount of estimated credit calculated using the a priori formula was compared to the average amount of time required to complete each article based on pharmacists' self-reporting. RESULTS: A strong positive relationship between the amount of time required to complete the home study courses based on the a priori calculation and the times reported by pharmacists completing the 10 courses was found (p < 0.001). The correlation accounted for 86.2% of the total variability in the average pharmacist reported completion times (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The formula offers an efficient and accurate means of determining the amount of continuing education credit that should be assigned to printed home study courses.


Subject(s)
Education, Pharmacy, Continuing/methods , Educational Measurement , Pharmacists , Programmed Instructions as Topic , Accreditation , Education, Distance/methods , Humans , Societies, Pharmaceutical , United States , Wisconsin
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...