Single-center experience with intraprocedural cleansing system to improve inadequate bowel preparation during colonoscopy.

Inadequate bowel preparation is common despite various preprocedure interventions. There is a need for an intervention at the time of colonoscopy to combat poor preparation. In this retrospective, observational study of 46 patients, we evaluated the clinical efficacy and feasibility of implementing the third generation of the Pure-Vu EVS System, a US Food and Drug Administration-cleared over-the-scope-based intraprocedural cleansing device, into our practice at the Minneapolis VA Medical Center (Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States). To study clinical efficacy, we measured bowel preparation adequacy before and after using the device, as measured by the Boston Bowel Preparation Score, and reviewed colonoscopy surveillance interval recommendations. Technical success and feasibility of using the device were measured by procedure success rates and duration. We found that BBPS scores increased from 4.4 to 7.9 when using the device. Technical success was achieved 78.3% of the time (36/46 cases). Median colonoscopy duration was 46 minutes, although there was a trend toward shorter procedures over time. This is the first clinical evaluation of the third generation of an intraprocedural cleansing device. We found the device efficacious and easy to use with low procedure failure rates, but it does come with a learning curve. We suspect that adoption of this device mutually will benefit patients and health systems with the potential to improve resource utilization.

Evaluation of consumer digital radon measurement devices: a comparative analysis.

Kansas State University (KSU) Engineering Extension conducted an abridged evaluation of eight consumer grade digital radon monitors. Using the KSU secondary radon chamber, these devices were exposed to three different radon concentrations for 7 d in average household temperature and relative humidity conditions. The three different radon concentration ranges used were: 12.8 pCi L-1to 15.5 pCi L-1(473.6 Bq m-3-573.5 Bq m-3), 27.7 pCi L-1to 29.4 pCi L-1(1024.9-10 857.8 Bq m-3), and ambient room level average radon concentration of 0.6 pCi L-1(22.2 Bq m-3). The American National Standards Institute/American Academy of Radon Scientists and Technologists Performance Specifications for Instrumentation Systems Designed to Measure Radon Gas in Air (ANSI/AARST MS-PC) (ANSI/AARST MS-PC 2022Performance Specifications for Instrumentation Systems Designed to Measure Radon Gas in Air(AARST Radon Standards)) minimum performance metrics were used to evaluate the accuracy and precision of each model type for each radon concentration tested. The eight different device models performed within the 0 ± 25% requirement for the individual percent error (IPE) for radon concentrations between 27.7 pCi L-1and 29.4 pCi L-1(1024.9-10 857.8 Bq m-3). For radon concentrations between 12.8 pCi L-1and 15.5 pCi L-1(444-592 Bq m-3) seven of the eight monitors fell within the IPE requirement and for ambient room radon concentrations six of the eight monitors fell within the IPE requirement for the ANSI/AARST MS-PC minimum performance requirement (ANSI/AARST MS-PC 2022Performance Specifications for Instrumentation Systems Designed to Measure Radon Gas in Air(AARST Radon Standards)) ranges. All eight device models fell within the ± 15% ANSI/AARST MS-PC minimum performance requirement (ANSI/AARST MS-PC 2022Performance Specifications for Instrumentation Systems Designed to Measure Radon Gas in Air(AARST Radon Standards)) coefficient of variation (CV) range for radon concentrations between 12.8 pCi L-1and 15.5 pCi L-1(444-592 Bq m-3) and for radon concentrations between 27.7 pCi L-1and 29.4 pCi L-1(1024.9-10 857.8 Bq m-3). In the future, evaluating the performance of these models over time to observe their long term accuracy and precision is anticipated.

Analysis of Reported Adverse Events Related to Hemospray: An FDA MAUDE Database Study.

BACKGROUND: Topical hemostatic powder is a mineral powder that forms an adherent barrier and coagulates active bleeding in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Hemospray is the first hemostatic powder approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States. Hemospray has been increasingly used to manage GI bleeding. However, data on the adverse events of hemostatic powders are lacking. Therefore, we aim to report and analyze adverse events associated with Hemospray using the FDA's "Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience" database. METHODS: We analyzed the postmarketing surveillance data from the FDA's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database for Hemospray, initially known as TC-325, from June 2018 through April 2022. Results of the search were classified into device-related technical issues, patient-related adverse events and health care staff-related adverse events. RESULTS: Five hundred two medical device reporting claims were identified from June 2018 through April 2022. Seven duplicate claims were identified, and some claims included more than one event type. Therefore, there were 558 device-related problems, 28 patient-related adverse events, and 2 adverse events in health care staff members. The most common device-related problems were activation failure or failure to fire (n = 385, 70.0%) and obstruction of carbon dioxide flow (n = 121, 21.7). The most common patient-related adverse events included tissue injury or bleeding (n = 21) and perforation (n = 5). CONCLUSION: Although Hemospray is a valuable tool in the armamentarium for endoscopists in managing GI bleeding, endoscopists must be mindful of deice-related problems and potential patient-related adverse events.

Use of Endoscopic Suturing for the Treatment of Malignant Gastric Ulcer-Related Hemorrhage.

Gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to malignancy can be difficult to manage with traditional endoscopic therapies. Endoscopic suturing is a relatively new technology with limited data available regarding its use for bleeding related to peptic ulcer disease. We describe a case where endoscopic suturing was successfully used to control gastrointestinal hemorrhage from a previously known malignant ulceration that was refractory to traditional interventions.

American Gastroenterological Association-American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline: Pharmacological Management of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) is a common disorder associated with significant impairment in quality of life. This clinical practice guideline, jointly developed by the American Gastroenterological Association and the American College of Gastroenterology, aims to inform clinicians and patients by providing evidence-based practice recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of CIC in adults. METHODS: The American Gastroenterological Association and the American College of Gastroenterology formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that conducted systematic reviews of the following agents: fiber, osmotic laxatives (polyethylene glycol, magnesium oxide, lactulose), stimulant laxatives (bisacodyl, sodium picosulfate, senna), secretagogues (lubiprostone, linaclotide, plecanatide), and serotonin type 4 agonist (prucalopride). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework to assess the certainty of evidence for each intervention. The Evidence to Decision framework was used to develop clinical recommendations based on the balance between the desirable and undesirable effects, patient values, costs, and health equity considerations. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 10 recommendations for the pharmacological management of CIC in adults. Based on available evidence, the panel made strong recommendations for the use of polyethylene glycol, sodium picosulfate, linaclotide, plecanatide, and prucalopride for CIC in adults. Conditional recommendations were made for the use of fiber, lactulose, senna, magnesium oxide, and lubiprostone. DISCUSSION: This document provides a comprehensive outline of the various over-the-counter and prescription pharmacological agents available for the treatment of CIC. The guidelines are meant to provide a framework for approaching the management of CIC; clinical providers should engage in shared decision making based on patient preferences as well as medication cost and availability. Limitations and gaps in the evidence are highlighted to help guide future research opportunities and enhance the care of patients with chronic constipation.

American Gastroenterological Association-American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline: Pharmacological Management of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) is a common disorder associated with significant impairment in quality of life. This clinical practice guideline, jointly developed by the American Gastroenterological Association and the American College of Gastroenterology, aims to inform clinicians and patients by providing evidence-based practice recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of CIC in adults. METHODS: The American Gastroenterological Association and the American College of Gastroenterology formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that conducted systematic reviews of the following agents: fiber, osmotic laxatives (polyethylene glycol, magnesium oxide, lactulose), stimulant laxatives (bisacodyl, sodium picosulfate, senna), secretagogues (lubiprostone, linaclotide, plecanatide), and serotonin type 4 agonist (prucalopride). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework to assess the certainty of evidence for each intervention. The Evidence to Decision framework was used to develop clinical recommendations based on the balance between the desirable and undesirable effects, patient values, costs, and health equity considerations. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 10 recommendations for the pharmacological management of CIC in adults. Based on available evidence, the panel made strong recommendations for the use of polyethylene glycol, sodium picosulfate, linaclotide, plecanatide, and prucalopride for CIC in adults. Conditional recommendations were made for the use of fiber, lactulose, senna, magnesium oxide, and lubiprostone. DISCUSSION: This document provides a comprehensive outline of the various over-the-counter and prescription pharmacological agents available for the treatment of CIC. The guidelines are meant to provide a framework for approaching the management of CIC; clinical providers should engage in shared decision making based on patient preferences as well as medication cost and availability. Limitations and gaps in the evidence are highlighted to help guide future research opportunities and enhance the care of patients with chronic constipation.

A Consensus Diagnosis Utilizing Surface KI-67 Expression as an Ancillary Marker in Low-Grade Dysplasia Helps Identify Patients at High Risk of Progression to High-Grade Dysplasia and Esophaegal Adenocarcinoma.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) develops in a step-wise manner, from low-grade dysplasia (LGD) to high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and ultimately to invasive EAC. However, there remains diagnostic uncertainty about LGD and its risk of progression to HGD/EAC. The aim is to investigate the role of Ki-67, immune-histochemical marker of proliferation, surface expression in patients with confirmed LGD, and risk stratify progression to HGD/EAC. A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients with confirmed LGD and indefinite for dysplasia (IND), with a mean follow-up of ≥1 year, were included. Pathology specimens were stained for Ki-67 and analyzed for evidence of surface expression. Our results reveal that 29% of patients with confirmed LGD who stained positive with Ki-67 progressed to HGD/EAC as opposed to none (0%) of the patients who stained negative, a statistically significant result (P = 0.003). Similarly, specimens from patients with IND were stained and analyzed revealing a nonsignificant trend toward a higher rate of progression for Ki-67 positive cases versus Ki-67 negative, 30% versus 21%, respectively. Ki-67 expression by itself can identify patients with LGD at a high risk of progression.

Neuroendocrine Tumor Diagnosed Through Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy of a Lung Mass.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is an excellent modality for tissue acquisition and has been shown to be superior to EUS-fine-needle aspiration in several studies. Although tissue sampling of lung nodules using EUS-fine-needle aspiration has been reported in the literature, the use of EUS-FNB for tissue acquisition of parenchymal lung mass has rarely been reported in the literature. Our report highlights that EUS-FNB is safe and effective for lung lesions that are near the esophageal wall.

Optimization of Immunophenotypic Panel to Differentiate Upper From Lower Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinomas: Analysis of New and Traditional Markers.

Adenocarcinomas of the esophagus (EAC), stomach [gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC)], and colorectal carcinoma (CRC) frequently show similar morphology because upper gastrointestinal tumors (GITs) usually evolve from pathologies involving intestinal metaplasia. Upper and lower GIT may also show overlapping immunophenotypes when using the traditional CK7, CK20, and CDX2 panel, which in patients presenting with metastatic disease of unknown origin may lead to misdirected diagnostic workup and/or therapy. We compared the phenotype of upper and lower GIT using an expanded immunohistochemical panel that included the traditional and newer gastrointestinal markers: SATB2, DcR3, MUC5AC, and MUC6. The panel was applied to resection specimens from 40 CRC, 40 GAC, and 40 EAC. A panel using SATB2, CK7, and CDX2 provided the best discriminating power for separating upper from lower GIT and was applied to 101 biopsies including 17 EAC, 17 GAC, 19 CRC, 18 pancreatic adenocarcinomas, 15 cholangiocarcinomas, and 15 lung adenocarcinomas. The phenotype CK7/CDX2/SATB2 was moderately sensitive and highly specific of upper GIT, the phenotype CK7/CDX2/SATB2 was highly sensitive and specific for lower GIT, the phenotypes CK7/CDX2/SATB2 and CK7/CDX2/SATB2 favored pancreatobiliary or lung primaries. Less frequent phenotypes showed substantial overlap. Although strong diffuse expression of SATB2 was characteristic of CRC, weak and/or focal expression was present in one third or more of upper gastrointestinal, cholangiocarcinomas, and lung adenocarcinomas. DcR3, MUC5AC, and MUC6 improved specificity, but showed poor sensitivity, suggesting they should be used as second tier markers.

Management of Opioid-Induced and Non-Opioid-Related Constipation in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to inform the development of national clinical practice guidelines on the management of cancer constipation. LITERATURE SEARCH: PubMed®, Wiley Cochrane Library, and CINAHL® were searched for studies published from May 2009 to May 2019. DATA EVALUATION: Two investigators independently reviewed and extracted data from eligible studies. The Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool was used, and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. SYNTHESIS: For patients with cancer and opioid-induced constipation, moderate benefit was found for osmotic or stimulant laxatives; small benefit was found for methylnaltrexone, naldemedine, and electroacupuncture. For patients with cancer and non-opioid-related constipation, moderate benefit was found for naloxegol, prucalopride, lubiprostone, and linaclotide; trivial benefit was found for acupuncture. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Effective strategies for managing opioid-induced and non-opioid-related constipation in patients with cancer include lifestyle, pharmacologic, and complementary approaches. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL CAN BE FOUND AT HTTPS: //bit.ly/3c4yewT.

ONS Guidelines™ for Opioid-Induced and Non-Opioid-Related Cancer Constipation.

PURPOSE: This evidence-based guideline intends to support clinicians, patients, and others in decisions regarding the treatment of constipation in patients with cancer. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: An interprofessional panel of healthcare professionals with patient representation prioritized clinical questions and patient outcomes for the management of cancer-related constipation. Systematic reviews of the literature were conducted. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach was used to assess the evidence and make recommendations. FINDINGS: The panel agreed on 13 recommendations for the management of opioid-induced and non-opioid-related constipation in patients with cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The panel conditionally recommended a bowel regimen in addition to lifestyle education as first-line treatment for constipation. For patients starting opioids, the panel suggests a bowel regimen as prophylaxis. Pharmaceutical interventions are available and recommended if a bowel regimen has failed. Acupuncture and electroacupuncture for non-opioid-related constipation are recommended in the context of a clinical trial. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL CAN BE FOUND AT HTTPS: //bit.ly/30y29sI.

Persistent indefinite for dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus is a risk factor for dysplastic progression to low-grade dysplasia.

Patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) are at increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The risk is largely based on the degree of dysplasia. Dysplasia cannot always be differentiated from inflammatory changes, and therefore may be classified as indefinite for dysplasia (IND). The risk of progressive dysplasia in patients with IND is unclear. Our aim is to characterize the risk of progression in US veterans with BE-IND. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with BE-IND between 2006 and 2016. All IND was diagnosed by consensus conference with an expert gastrointestinal (GI) pathologist or review by an expert GI pathologist and persistence was defined as IND present on subsequent endoscopic biopsy. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of high-grade dysplasia (HGD)/EAC. Secondary outcomes included any progression including incident low-grade dysplasia (LGD), any prevalent dysplasia and risk factors for dysplastic progression, namely persistent IND. Risk factors for progression were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis with logistic regression. Among 107 patients with BE-IND, there were no incident cases of HGD/EAC. Twenty patients (18.7%) developed incident LGD during a median follow-up of 2.39 years (interquartile range, 1.13-5.17). The annual rate of progression to LGD was 5.95 per 100 patient-years (95% CI, 3.73-9.02). Prevalent dysplasia was common (9.3%). Eight patients had prevalent LGD, one patient had prevalent HGD and one patient had prevalent EAC. Twenty-eight patients (30.1%) were found to have persistent IND. Among those with persistent IND, 10 (36%) patients progressed to LGD (none to HGD/EAC). The progression rate to LGD for patients with persistent IND was 7.86 (95% CI, 3.99-14.02) cases per 100 patient-years versus 4.78 (95% CI, 2.48-8.52) for nonpersistent IND (P = 0.036). The odds ratio for progression to LGD in persistent IND was 3.06 (95% CI, 1.08-8.64). In multivariate analysis adjusting for age, smoking history, presence of hiatal hernia and BMI > 30, persistent IND remained significant (OR 3.23; 95% CI, 1.04-9.98). Regression to nondysplastic BE was very common. Seventy-one (61%) patients developed complete and sustained regression of all dysplastic changes at last follow-up. Persistent IND, present in one-third of patients with IND, is an independent risk factor for progression to LGD. Although no patients in this cohort developed HGD/EAC, prevalent dysplasia was common (9.3%). Taken together, patients with IND should receive close surveillance for both prevalent and incident dysplasia especially if IND is persistent.

Surface Ki-67 Expression Improves Reproducibility of Dysplasia Diagnosis in Barrett's Esophagus.

OBJECTIVES: Many studies have shown poor reproducibility among pathologists for diagnosing dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE). Immunohistochemical stains (IHC) are not widely used due to overlapping expression patterns in reactive and dysplastic processes. We hypothesized that markers involved in cell-cycle (cyclin D1, Ki-67, P16), differentiation/cell-cell interaction (ß-catenin, SATB2 CD44, OCT4) and senescence (γH2AX) would produce different results in reactive and dysplastic processes. METHODS: A micrograph album of 40 H&E and matching IHCs depicting optimally oriented lesions were evaluated independently by 3 pathologists. Expression was scored separately in the surface, isthmus, and base regions of the glands. RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed that surface Ki-67 expression showed the largest difference in expression and smallest P value (P < .001) for identifying dysplasia. At a cutoff level of 5% or less, negative predictive value (NPV) was 100%. κ correlation between pathologists improved from substantial to almost perfect (0.70-0.95) using ancillary surface Ki-67. CONCLUSION: A case-control study with glass slides including all diagnostic categories using this parameter confirmed improved κ correlation among pathologists (0.29 vs 0.60), better correlation with outcomes (76% vs 69%), increased odd risks (15.3) for progression in positive cases, and an improvement in sensitivity (88% vs 64%) and NPV (88% vs 73%) compared to histology alone.

Not Too Hot, Not Too Cold, but "Just Right".

When ordering diagnostic tests, physicians are faced with a problem of not too many tests, not too few, but 'just right'. However, in medical diagnostics 'just right' may be very difficult to identify. Such is the conundrum presented in study by Rubenstein and colleagues regarding appropriate use of repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) medical facilities. The important message of this paper is that out of 235,855 patients with an index EGD, 36% underwent repeat EGD over 5 years, of which only 9% (range 3-18%a cross VHA facilities) were classified as probable overuse.