Acceptance among and impact on dental practitioners and patients of American Heart Association recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: The 2007 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for the prevention of infective endocarditis (IE) called for a major reduction in the number of patients recommended for antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) and redefined the dental procedures considered to put these patients at risk of acquiring the infection. The purpose of the authors' study was to determine the acceptance of these changes among and the impact of the changes on dentists and their patients. METHODS: The authors sent a survey to a random sample of 5,500 dentists in the United States. RESULTS: Ninety-five percent of the 878 respondents indicated that they saw patients who receive AP. More than 75 percent were either satisfied or very satisfied with the AHA guidelines, and the respondents indicated that they believed almost three-quarters of their patients also were pleased. Seventy percent of dentists, however, had patients who took antibiotics before a dental procedure even though the guidelines no longer recommend it. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptance of the 2007 guidelines appears to be high, but controversy remains. Additional scientific data are needed to resolve these issues. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The 2007 AHA guidelines have greatly simplified the identification of patients who need AP for dental procedures, given that, in general, far fewer people with cardiac abnormalities are considered to be at risk as a result of invasive procedures. Some physicians, however, continue to prescribe antibiotics for some patients whom the AHA no longer considers to need them. Patients also may choose to continue this practice themselves. There is ongoing controversy surrounding this common clinical question in dental practice, and the next guidelines from the AHA may change on the basis of data from future clinical studies.

A systematic review of oral health outcomes produced by dental teams incorporating midlevel providers.

BACKGROUND: The authors conducted a systematic review on this research question: "In populations where nondentists conduct diagnostic, treatment planning, and/or irreversible/ surgical dental procedures, is there a change in disease increment, untreated dental disease, and/or cost-effectiveness of dental care?" METHODS: The authors searched 12 electronic databases for articles published through February 2012 and hand searched relevant articles. They assessed the risk of bias of included studies and extracted data. RESULTS: The authors screened 7,701 citations, resulting in 18 observational studies that met the inclusion criteria. They judged 13 of the studies to be at high risk of bias, five at moderate risk and one at low risk. The authors found no data regarding cost effectiveness, irreversible diagnostic procedures or diseases other than caries. CONCLUSIONS: The authors concluded that the quality of the evidence was poor. They found that in select groups in which participants received irreversible dental treatment from teams that included midlevel providers, caries increment, caries severity or both decreased across time; however, there was no difference in caries increment, caries severity or both compared with those in populations in which dentists provided all irreversible treatment. In select groups in which participants had received irreversible dental treatment from teams that included midlevel providers, there was a decrease in untreated caries across time and a decrease in untreated caries compared with that in populations in which dentists provided all treatment. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Generalizability of results to populations other than those studied is limited owing to the age of some of the studies, as well as to clinical and methodological heterogeneity; consequently, the conclusions should be viewed with caution.

Microbial induction of B and T cell areas in rabbit appendix.

Gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) development requires interaction with the intestinal microbiota. Because murine secondary lymphoid tissue development is driven by positive feedback interactions between B cells and stromal cells, we used in situ hybridization to determine whether intestinal commensals influence such interactions during rabbit appendix development. The features of positive feedback interactions we examined (CXCL13 mRNA expression, B cell accumulation and FDC differentiation) increased during early follicle development, but stalled in the absence of intestinal commensals. These features were reinitiated by commensals that stimulated follicle development and intrafollicular B cell proliferation. Our results suggest that rabbit appendix follicles develop in two phases: an initial phase of B cell recruitment to nascent follicles, possibly through positive feedback interactions, and a subsequent phase of intrafollicular B cell proliferation stimulated by intestinal commensals. In addition, we found that intestinal commensals stimulate appendix CCL21 mRNA expression and T cell area formation.