Delphi study to identify consensus on patient selection for hydrogel rectal spacer use during radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the UK.

OBJECTIVES: To identify consensus on patient prioritisation for rectal hydrogel spacer use during radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer in the UK. DESIGN: Delphi study consisting of two rounds of online questionnaires, two virtual advisory board meetings and a final online questionnaire. SETTING: Radical radiation therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate cancer in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Six leading clinical oncologists and one urologist from across the UK. INTERVENTIONS: Rectal hydrogel spacer. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: None reported. RESULTS: The panel reached consensus on the importance of minimising toxicity for treatments with curative intent and that even low-grade toxicity-related adverse events can significantly impact quality of life. There was agreement that despite meeting rectal dose constraints, too many patients experience rectal toxicity and that rectal hydrogel spacers in eligible patients significantly reduces toxicity-related adverse events. However, as a consequence of funding limitations, patients need to be prioritised for spacer use. A higher benefit of spacers can be expected in patients on anticoagulation and in patients with diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease, but consensus could not be reached regarding patient groups expected to benefit less. While radiation therapy regimen is not a main factor determining prioritisation, higher benefit is expected in ultrahypofractionated regimens. CONCLUSION: There is a strong and general agreement that all patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical radiation therapy have the potential to benefit from hydrogel spacers. Currently, not all patients who could potentially benefit can access hydrogel spacers, and access is unequal. Implementation of the consensus recommendations would likely help prioritise and equalise access to rectal spacers for patients in the UK.

The Economic Implications of Introducing Single-Patient ECG Systems for Cardiac Surgery in Australia.

INTRODUCTION: Sternal wound infections (SWIs) are severe adverse events of cardiac surgery. This study aimed to estimate the economic burden of SWIs following coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) in Australia. It also aimed to estimate the national and hospital cost-benefit of adopting single-patient electrocardiograph (spECG) systems for CABG monitoring, a measure that reduces the rate of surgical site infections (SSIs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature review, which focused on CABG-related SSIs, was conducted to identify data which were then used to adapt a published Markov cost-effectiveness model. The model adopted an Australian hospital perspective. RESULTS: The average SWI-related cost of care increase per patient was estimated at 1022 Australian dollars (AUD), and the annual burden to the Australian health care system at AUD 9.2 million. SWI burden comprised 360 additional intensive care unit (ICU) days; 1979 additional general ward (GW) days; and 186 readmissions. Implementing spECG resulted in 103 fewer ICU days, 565 fewer GW days, 48 avoided readmissions, and a total national cost saving of AUD 2.5 million, annually. A hospital performing 200 yearly CABGs was estimated to save AUD 54,830. CONCLUSION: SWIs cause substantial costs to the Australian health care system. Implementing new technologies shown to reduce the SWI rate is likely to benefit patients and reduce costs.

Economic consequences of migraine in Sweden and implications for the cost-effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) for chronic migraine in Sweden and Norway.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a common and incapacitating condition, with severe impact on the quality of life (QoL) of the afflicted and their families, and negative economic consequences through decreased workforce participation, reduced functional ability and elevated healthcare costs. This study aimed to describe the economic consequences of migraine in Sweden using cost of illness survey data and, based on this data, assess the cost-effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) for the treatment of chronic migraine in Sweden and Norway. METHODS: A survey study was conducted in Swedish migraine patients, with questions on patient characteristics, headache frequency and severity, effect on daily activities and work, QoL, health resource utilization, and medication use. Resulting costs were estimated as annual averages over subgroups of average monthly headache days. Some results were used to inform a Markov cost-effectiveness chronic migraine model. The model was adapted to Sweden and Norway using local data. The analysis perspective was semi-societal. Results' robustness was tested using one-way, structural, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Results from the cost of illness analysis (n = 454) indicated a clear correlation between decreased QoL and increased costs with increasing monthly headache days. Total annual costs ranged from EUR 6221 in patients with 0-4 headache days per month, to EUR 57,832 in patients with 25-31. Indirect costs made up the majority of costs, ranging from 82% of total costs in the 0-4 headache days group, to 91% in 25-31 headache days. The cost-effectiveness analyses indicated that in Sweden, Botox was associated with 0.223 additional QALYs at an additional cost of EUR 4126 compared to placebo, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of EUR 18,506. In Norway, Botox was associated with 0.216 additional QALYs at an additional cost of EUR 4301 compared to placebo, resulting in an ICER of EUR 19,954. CONCLUSIONS: In people with migraine, an increase in monthly headache days is clearly related to lower QoL and higher costs, indicating considerable potential costs-savings in reducing the number of headache days. The main cost driver for migraine is indirect costs. Botox reduces headache days and is a cost-effective treatment for chronic migraine in Sweden and Norway.

Cost and Health Outcomes Patterns in Patients Treated With Spinal Cord Stimulation Following Spine Surgery-A Register-Based Study.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS), a minimally invasive treatment option for long-term neuropathic pain, has been shown to be effective in patients with persisting neuropathic pain after spine surgery. However, little is known about the long-term cost and quality-of-life (QoL) patterns in SCS-treated patients. The aim is to describe the use of SCS, costs, pre-spine-surgery and post-spine-surgery QoL, and reported pain intensity, in patients who have undergone spine surgery and subsequent SCS implantation. The results will be related to outcome and cost in spine surgery patients in general. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A research database comprised from six Swedish national and regional registers, and the spine surgery quality-of-care register Swespine was utilized. Two cohorts were identified: all patients who had spine surgery (N = 73,765) and patients who had spine surgery and subsequent SCS implantation (N = 239). Costs were analyzed before and after spine surgery for both cohorts, as well as before and after SCS implantation for the second cohort. QoL was explored by estimating patient-reported outcome measures such as pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index, and EuroQol-5Dimensions from spine surgery up to five years post-spine surgery. RESULTS: In spine surgery patients, mean QoL and pain intensity levels improved following surgery. Patients subsequently treated with SCS had lower reported QoL and higher costs before the initial spine surgery, and spine surgery did not lead to any substantial improvements, however, costs decreased following SCS implantation in these patients.

The Association Between Patient Reported Outcomes of Spinal Surgery and Societal Costs: A Register Based Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective register-based study using Swedish registers and data prospectively collected in quality register Swespine. OBJECTIVE: Analyze the association of societal costs and spine surgery outcome in low back pain (LBP) patients based on patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Studies show that LBP has a substantial impact on societal cost. There are indications that the burden diverges over different patient groups, but little is known about cost patterns in relation to PROMs of LBP surgery. METHODS: We utilized a database with data from six registers. All lumbar spine surgery patients registered in Swespine 2000 to 2012 were identified. Swespine collects PROMs Global Assessment of pain improvement (GA), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and EuroQol five-dimension scale (EQ-5D). A literature search was conducted to identify threshold changes in ODI, VAS, and EQ-5D representing a significant improvement or deterioration as defined by the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). We categorized patients into groups by their GA response at 2-year follow-up and estimated mean changes in ODI, VAS, and EQ-5D for each group. These changes were compared with the MCID thresholds to determine a GA-anchored classification of surgical outcomes. Costs consisted of out/inpatient care, sick leave, early retirement, and pharmaceuticals. RESULTS: In total, 12,350 patients were included. GA 1-2 ("pain has disappeared"/"pain is much improved") were labeled successful surgery outcomes (67%), GA 3 ("pain somewhat improved"), undetermined (16%), and GA 4-5 ("no change in pain"/"pain has worsened") unsuccessful (17%). Costs of the unsuccessful and undetermined were higher than of the successful during the entire study period, with differences increasing markedly post-surgery. For the successful, a downward cost trend was observed; costs almost returned to the level observed 3 years pre-surgery. No such trend was observed in the other groups. CONCLUSION: Identifying patients with higher probability of responding to surgery could lead to improved health and substantial societal cost savings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Cost-effectiveness of ustekinumab in moderate to severe Crohn's disease in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Human monoclonal antibody ustekinumab is a novel Crohn's disease (CD) treatment blocking pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-12 and 23. The study's objective was to assess cost-effectiveness of ustekinumab in moderate to severely active CD in Sweden. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness model with an induction phase decision-tree structure and a maintenance phase Markov cohort structure was constructed. CD was represented by five health-states: remission, mild, moderate-severe, surgery and death. Ustekinumab was compared to adalimumab in patients who had failed conventional care, some of which had tried TNF-alpha-inhibitor(s) without experiencing treatment failure or side effects ("conventional care failure population") and to vedolizumab in patients previously failing TNF-alpha-inhibitor treatment. Discontinuation probabilities, utilities and ustekinumab induction efficacy were sourced from phase-III trials. Maintenance and comparator efficacy came from network-meta and treatment-sequence analyses. Resource use and unit costs were derived from literature and validated by clinical experts. The analysis had a societal perspective, a life-time time-horizon, and 2-year treatment duration. The results robustness was tested in univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Cost-effectiveness was estimated using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). RESULTS: Ustekinumab dominated adalimumab in conventional care failure population (costs: - €6984, QALYs: + 0.232). In TNF-alpha-inhibitor failure population ustekinumab accrued 0.133 more QALYs than vedolizumab, yielding a €30,282 incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Results were sensitive to decreasing the time horizon and increased treatment duration. At Swedish reference willingness-to-pay of €63,000 (SEK 600,000), ustekinumab had 94% probability of being cost-effective versus adalimumab, and 72% versus vedolizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate ustekinumab dominates adalimumab in conventional care failure population, and is cost-effective versus vedolizumab in TNF-alpha-inhibitor failure population.