Barriers to implementing protocols for kidney paired donation and desensitization: survey of U.S. transplant programs.

CONTEXT: Special types of kidney transplant exist for patients who have willing but incompatible donors. Two types of transplants that circumvent donor-recipient incompatibility are "kidney paired donation" and "desensitization." Lack of access to these protocols limits living donations and shortens the life span of patients with willing but incompatible donors. OBJECTIVE: To understand potential barriers to implementing kidney paired donation and desensitization, as well as attitudes toward nondirected donation and compatible type O donation, which would maximize the number of kidney paired donation transplants performed via chains. DESIGN: We created a 56-question Web-based survey to elicit information from US transplant program directors about 24 potential barriers to implementing these protocols. PARTICIPANTS: Of 166 programs contacted, 96 responded, including 88 complete and 8 partial responses. After pediatric-only programs and multiple responses from the same program were removed, 84 total (78 complete) remained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Respondents were asked to designate each barrier as "major," "minor," or "not a barrier". RESULTS: Availability of dedicated nurse coordinators and the United Network for Organ Sharing's variance request process (although kidney paired donation does not actually require a variance) were significant barriers to kidney paired donation. Most respondents (54%, 42/78) would prefer to participate in a regional rather than a national protocol for kidney paired donation. Risk of complications was the most significant barrier to desensitization. University affiliation, region, and training (nephrologist vs surgeon) had little effect on perception of barriers. Most (92%, 71/78) would evaluate nondirected donations; 53% (41/78) would encourage compatible type O donors to enter kidney paired donation.

The development of a successful multiregional kidney paired donation program.

BACKGROUND: Kidney paired donation (KPD) is increasing the number of living donor transplants. Two major obstacles prevent moving KPD forward in the United States: (1) achieving a critical mass of pairs to efficiently find matches and (2) efficiently coordinating KPD transplants between multiple transplant centers. Two large regional programs, The New England Program for Kidney Exchange (NEPKE) and the Mid-Atlantic Paired Exchange Program (MAPEP) have developed a system of protocols to effectively increase the number of KPD transplants. METHODS: Incompatible pairs and nondirected donors (NDD) are referred to the system through transplant centers. Donor and recipient ABO, human leukocyte antigen, and recipient human leukocyte antigen antibody screening are used to determine potential matches. Utilization of a computer optimization algorithm matches pairs in two- and three-way exchanges, NDD chains, and list exchange chains. Team conference calls regarding transfer of information, crossmatches, surgery date, coordination of simultaneous donor nephrectomies, and other issues are coordinated as needed. RESULTS: Ten matches moved forward to donation and transplantation, and one is pending. Eight of these matches involved NDD chains, two 2-way exchanges, and 1 a list exchange chain. These matches resulted in 27 transplants. Eighteen transplants occurred in NEPKE-only transplant centers, four in MAPEP-only centers, and an additional five were crossregional. CONCLUSION: The collaboration of NEPKE and MAPEP has demonstrated that crossregional coordination is feasible and expands the number of transplants performed beyond the capability of either program alone, especially when combined with computer optimization and multiple-type matches of three-way, NDD chains, and list exchange chains.