ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the mechanisms of sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar fusion surgery and to present the clinical outcomes after a combining intra-and peri-articular injection.Methods Totally 20 male and 15 female patients (48-75 years old) from January 2013 to December 2016 were retrospectively included in the present study.The patients were all with sustained low back and hip pain after prior posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery.Nine cases were diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation,22 cases with lumbar stenosis,and 4 cases with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.Ten cases were performed with single level fusion,16 cases with two level fusion,9 cases with 3 or more level fusion.Autogenous iliac bone graft was not applied in any of those patients.The pain of the patients was confirmed from the sacroiliac joint through specific symptoms and signs.They were divided into two groups and were treated with either standard intra-articular injection (17 cases) or a combine of intra-and peri-articular sacroiliac injection (18 cases).Peri-articular injection was conducted at 1 cm above the inferior margin of the sacroiliac joint.Recover ratios of visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) at 2 weeks post-operatively were recorded and were compared between the two groups.Results No statistical difference was found in gender,fusion location,fusion levels,pre-operative VAS and ODI score between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05).The combination of intra-and peri-articular sacroiliac injection showed significantly better results than the single intra-articular injection in VAS score immediately after injection (t=2.159,P=0.038),VAS score at 2 weeks after injection and ODI score at 2 weeks after the injection (t=2.705,P=0.011;t=2.156,P=0.039,respectively).Conclusion Both intra-and extra-sacroiliac joint diseases may lead to sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar fusion surgery.A single intra-articular sacroiliac injection could not provide optimistic outcomes.Further extra-articular injection is required at approximate 1 cm above the inferior margin of the sacroiliac joint.The technique combining intra-and peri-articular injection could guarantee improved early clinical outcomes.
ABSTRACT
This study reports an outbreak of acute febrile respiratory illness caused by human adenovirus B [P14H11F14] in a military training center in China between May and June 2014. In total, 164 military personnel were affected, and two patients were admitted into the intensive care unit of the military regional central hospital. A HAdV-B [P14H11F14] virus was confirmed as the etiological pathogen of this acute outbreak of febrile respiratory illness based on clinical manifestations, epidemiological characteristics, specific molecular detection results, phylogenetic analysis, and serological assays. The virus was isolated by the rhabdomyosarcoma cell culture method, and the complete sequences of the E1A, penton base, hexon, and fiber genes were determined and deposited in the GenBank database. Phylogenetic and sequence homology analyses indicated that the isolated strain is most closely related to some HAdV-55 strains from mainland China. However, this strain appeared to be less virulent than former HAdV-55 strains. According to the chest X-ray results of 31 affected patients, there was no radiological evidence of pneumonia. The most frequent symptoms in these patients were sore throat (95.12 %, 156/164) and tonsillitis (93.29 %, 153/164). During the course of the outbreak, incorrect response measures and some potential risk factors, such as fire training and marching training, may have exacerbated the spread of the infection. This outbreak illustrates the urgent need to improve the epidemiological and etiological surveillance of HAdV infections and to improve the ability of doctors and health officials in basic units of the Chinese army to respond effectively to febrile respiratory illness.
