ABSTRACT
The Hedgehog (Hh) cascade is central to development, tissue homeostasis and cancer. A pivotal step in Hh signal transduction is the activation of glioma-associated (GLI) transcription factors by the atypical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) SMOOTHENED (SMO). How SMO activates GLI remains unclear. Here we show that SMO uses a decoy substrate sequence to physically block the active site of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) catalytic subunit (PKA-C) and extinguish its enzymatic activity. As a result, GLI is released from phosphorylation-induced inhibition. Using a combination of in vitro, cellular and organismal models, we demonstrate that interfering with SMO-PKA pseudosubstrate interactions prevents Hh signal transduction. The mechanism uncovered echoes one used by the Wnt cascade, revealing an unexpected similarity in how these two essential developmental and cancer pathways signal intracellularly. More broadly, our findings define a mode of GPCR-PKA communication that may be harnessed by a range of membrane receptors and kinases.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Drosophila Proteins , Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Hedgehog Proteins/metabolism , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled/genetics , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled/metabolism , Signal Transduction/physiology , Smoothened Receptor/genetics , Smoothened Receptor/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolismABSTRACT
The Hedgehog (Hh) pathway is essential for organ development, homeostasis, and regeneration. Dysfunction of this cascade drives several cancers. To control expression of pathway target genes, the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) Smoothened (SMO) activates glioma-associated (GLI) transcription factors via an unknown mechanism. Here, we show that, rather than conforming to traditional GPCR signaling paradigms, SMO activates GLI by binding and sequestering protein kinase A (PKA) catalytic subunits at the membrane. This sequestration, triggered by GPCR kinase (GRK)-mediated phosphorylation of SMO intracellular domains, prevents PKA from phosphorylating soluble substrates, releasing GLI from PKA-mediated inhibition. Our work provides a mechanism directly linking Hh signal transduction at the membrane to GLI transcription in the nucleus. This process is more fundamentally similar between species than prevailing hypotheses suggest. The mechanism described here may apply broadly to other GPCR- and PKA-containing cascades in diverse areas of biology.
Subject(s)
Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinase Catalytic Subunits/antagonists & inhibitors , Hedgehog Proteins/metabolism , Smoothened Receptor/physiology , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Catalytic Domain/genetics , Cells, Cultured , Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinase Catalytic Subunits/chemistry , Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinase Catalytic Subunits/metabolism , Embryo, Nonmammalian , HEK293 Cells , Hedgehog Proteins/genetics , Humans , Mice , Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs/genetics , Signal Transduction/genetics , Smoothened Receptor/metabolism , ZebrafishABSTRACT
Both reactive nitrogen and oxygen species (RNS and ROS), such as nitric oxide, peroxynitrite, and hydrogen peroxide, have been implicated as mediators of pancreatic ß-cell damage during the pathogenesis of autoimmune diabetes. While ß-cells are thought to be vulnerable to oxidative damage due to reportedly low levels of antioxidant enzymes, such as catalase and glutathione peroxidase, we have shown that they use thioredoxin reductase to detoxify hydrogen peroxide. Thioredoxin reductase is an enzyme that participates in the peroxiredoxin antioxidant cycle. Peroxiredoxins are expressed in ß-cells and, when overexpressed, protect against oxidative stress, but the endogenous roles of peroxiredoxins in the protection of ß-cells from oxidative damage are unclear. Here, using either glucose oxidase or menadione to continuously deliver hydrogen peroxide, or the combination of dipropylenetriamine NONOate and menadione to continuously deliver peroxynitrite, we tested the hypothesis that ß-cells use peroxiredoxins to detoxify both of these reactive species. Either pharmacological peroxiredoxin inhibition with conoidin A or specific depletion of cytoplasmic peroxiredoxin 1 (Prdx1) using siRNAs sensitizes INS 832/13 cells and rat islets to DNA damage and death induced by hydrogen peroxide or peroxynitrite. Interestingly, depletion of peroxiredoxin 2 (Prdx2) had no effect. Together, these results suggest that ß-cells use cytoplasmic Prdx1 as a primary defense mechanism against both ROS and RNS.
