Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 45(1): 127-131, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37528766

ABSTRACT

We tested the effectiveness of 23 disinfectants used in healthcare facilities against isolates from the 4 major clades of Candida auris. Sporicidal disinfectants were consistently effective, whereas quaternary-ammonium disinfectants had limited activity. Quaternary-ammonium-alcohol and hydrogen-peroxide-based disinfectants varied in effectiveness against C. auris.


Subject(s)
Ammonium Compounds , Disinfectants , Humans , Candida auris , Candida , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Hydrogen Peroxide , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(5): 837-839, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35341485

ABSTRACT

A novel 1-step anionic surfactant disinfectant was effective against Candida auris isolates from the 4 major phylogenetic clades as well as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and the enveloped virus bacteriophage Phi6. This anionic surfactant disinfectant may be a useful addition to the disinfectant products available for use against C. auris.


Subject(s)
Disinfectants , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Humans , Candida auris , Candida , Phylogeny , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Antifungal Agents
4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(4): 670-673, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35997135

ABSTRACT

In a randomized trial, patients wearing slippers whenever out of bed transferred bacteriophage MS2 from hospital room floors to patients and surfaces significantly less often than controls not provided with slippers. Wearing slippers could provide a simple means to reduce the risk for acquisition of healthcare-associated pathogens from contaminated floors.Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04935892.


Subject(s)
Hospitals , Levivirus , Humans , Health Facilities
5.
Pathog Immun ; 7(1): 19-30, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35178491

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Poorly ventilated enclosed spaces pose a risk for airborne transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and other respiratory viruses. Limited information is available on ventilation in motor vehicles under differing driving conditions. METHODS: We conducted carbon dioxide measurements to assess ventilation in motor vehicles under varying driving conditions with 2 to 3 vehicle occupants. During routine driving, carbon dioxide produced by the breathing of vehicle occupants was measured inside 5 cars and a van under a variety of driving conditions with or without the ventilation fan on and with windows open or closed. Carbon dioxide readings above 800 parts per million (ppm) were considered an indicator of suboptimal ventilation. RESULTS: Carbon dioxide levels remained below 800 ppm in all vehicles if the ventilation fan was on and/or the windows were open while parked or during city or highway driving. With the ventilation system set on non-recirculation mode, carbon dioxide levels rose above 800 ppm in all vehicles when the fan was off and the windows were closed while parked and during city driving, and in 2 of the 6 vehicles during highway driving. With the ventilation system set on recirculation mode, carbon dioxide rose above 800 ppm within 10 minutes in all vehicles tested. CONCLUSION: Carbon dioxide measurements could provide a practical and rapid method to assess ventilation in motor vehicles. Simple measures such as opening windows, turning on the fan, and avoiding the recirculation mode greatly improve ventilation.

6.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(6): 747-751, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34011417

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) light devices could be useful to reduce environmental contamination with Candida auris. However, variable susceptibility of C. auris strains to UV-C has been reported, and the high cost of many devices limits their use in resource-limited settings. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of relatively low-cost (<$15,000 purchase price) UV-C devices against C. auris strains from the 4 major phylogenetic clades. METHODS: A modification of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard quantitative disk carrier test method (ASTM E 2197) was used to examine and compare the effectiveness of UV-C devices against C. auris, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and bacteriophage Phi6. Reductions of 3 log10 were considered effective. UV-C irradiance measurements and colorimetric indicators were used to assess UV-C output. RESULTS: Of 8 relatively low-cost UV-C devices, 6 met the criteria for effective decontamination of C. auris isolates from clades I and II, MRSA, and bacteriophage Phi6, including 3 room decontamination devices and 3 UV-C box devices. Candida auris isolates from clades III and IV were less susceptible to UV-C than clade I and II isolates; 1 relatively low-cost room decontamination device and 2 enclosed box devices met the criteria for effective decontamination of clade III and IV isolates. UV-C irradiance measurements and colorimetric indicator results were consistent with microorganism reductions. CONCLUSIONS: Some relatively low-cost UV-C light technologies are effective against C. auris, including isolates from clades III and IV with reduced UV-C susceptibility. Studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of UV-C devices in clinical settings.


Subject(s)
Candida , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candida auris , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Phylogeny , Ultraviolet Rays
8.
Am J Infect Control ; 49(12): 1572-1574, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34416312

ABSTRACT

A novel 4% hydrogen peroxide disinfectant was effective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Clostridioides difficile spores, carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli, and 2 strains of Candida auris. In laboratory testing, a sodium hypochlorite disinfectant caused fading and loss of pliability of a hospital mattress, but the hydrogen peroxide disinfectant did not. These findings suggest that the hydrogen peroxide-based disinfectant may be a useful addition to the sporicidal disinfectant products available for use in healthcare settings.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Disinfectants , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Disinfection , Humans , Hydrogen Peroxide/pharmacology
9.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(4): 425-430, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33040741

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is controversy regarding whether the addition of cover gowns offers a substantial benefit over gloves alone in reducing personnel contamination and preventing pathogen transmission. DESIGN: Simulated patient care interactions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of different types of barrier precautions and to identify routes of transmission. METHODS: In randomly ordered sequence, 30 personnel each performed 3 standardized examinations of mannequins contaminated with pathogen surrogate markers (cauliflower mosaic virus DNA, bacteriophage MS2, nontoxigenic Clostridioides difficile spores, and fluorescent tracer) while wearing no barriers, gloves, or gloves plus gowns followed by examination of a noncontaminated mannequin. We compared the frequency and routes of transfer of the surrogate markers to the second mannequin or the environment. RESULTS: For a composite of all surrogate markers, transfer by hands occurred at significantly lower rates in the gloves-alone group (OR, 0.02; P < .001) and the gloves-plus-gown group (OR, 0.06; P = .002). Transfer by stethoscope diaphragms was common in all groups and was reduced by wiping the stethoscope between simulations (OR, 0.06; P < .001). Compared to the no-barriers group, wearing a cover gown and gloves resulted in reduced contamination of clothing (OR, 0.15; P < .001), but wearing gloves alone did not. CONCLUSIONS: Wearing gloves alone or gloves plus gowns reduces hand transfer of pathogens but may not address transfer by devices such as stethoscopes. Cover gowns reduce the risk of contaminating the clothing of personnel.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Stethoscopes , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Delivery of Health Care , Gloves, Protective , Humans , Patient Transfer , Protective Clothing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...