Implications of gene tree heterogeneity on downstream phylogenetic analyses: A case study employing the Fair Proportion index.

Many questions in evolutionary biology require the specification of a phylogeny for downstream phylogenetic analyses. However, with the increasingly widespread availability of genomic data, phylogenetic studies are often confronted with conflicting signal in the form of genomic heterogeneity and incongruence between gene trees and the species tree. This raises the question of determining what data and phylogeny should be used in downstream analyses, and to what extent the choice of phylogeny (e.g., gene trees versus species trees) impacts the analyses and their outcomes. In this paper, we study this question in the realm of phylogenetic diversity indices, which provide ways to prioritize species for conservation based on their relative evolutionary isolation on a phylogeny, and are thus one example of downstream phylogenetic analyses. We use the Fair Proportion (FP) index, also known as the evolutionary distinctiveness score, and explore the variability in species rankings based on gene trees as compared to the species tree for several empirical data sets. Our results indicate that prioritization rankings among species vary greatly depending on the underlying phylogeny, suggesting that the choice of phylogeny is a major influence in assessing phylogenetic diversity in a conservation setting. While we use phylogenetic diversity conservation as an example, we suspect that other types of downstream phylogenetic analyses such as ancestral state reconstruction are similarly affected by genomic heterogeneity and incongruence. Our aim is thus to raise awareness of this issue and inspire new research on which evolutionary information (species trees, gene trees, or a combination of both) should form the basis for analyses in these settings.

A global test of hybrid ancestry from genome-scale data.

Methods based on the multi-species coalescent have been widely used in phylogenetic tree estimation using genome-scale DNA sequence data to understand the underlying evolutionary relationship between the sampled species. Evolutionary processes such as hybridization, which creates new species through interbreeding between two different species, necessitate inferring a species network instead of a species tree. A species tree is strictly bifurcating and thus fails to incorporate hybridization events which require an internal node of degree three. Hence, it is crucial to decide whether a tree or network analysis should be performed given a DNA sequence data set, a decision that is based on the presence of hybrid species in the sampled species. Although many methods have been proposed for hybridization detection, it is rare to find a technique that does so globally while considering a data generation mechanism that allows both hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting. In this paper, we consider hybridization and coalescence in a unified framework and propose a new test that can detect whether there are any hybrid species in a set of species of arbitrary size. Based on this global test of hybridization, one can decide whether a tree or network analysis is appropriate for a given data set.