Adjunctive Statin Therapy in Patients with Covid-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of adjunctive statin therapy in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) remains uncertain. METHODS: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrial.gov databases from March 2020 to late April 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing statin versus no statin use in patients hospitalized with Covid-19. We pooled risk ratios (RRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) applying a random-effects model. R version 4.3.1 was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: We included 7 RCTs comprising 4,262 patients, of whom 2,645 (62%) were randomized to receive statin therapy. Compared with no statin, statin use significantly reduced case-fatality rate (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.80-0.98; I2=0%). In a time-to-event analysis, we found similar results (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.75-0.99; I2=0%). Statin use also significantly reduced World Health Organization (WHO) scale at 14 days (mean difference -0.27; 95% CI -0.54 to -0.01; I2=0%). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in length of hospital stay, elevation of liver enzymes, and C-reactive protein levels. CONCLUSIONS: In patients hospitalized with Covid-19, statins significantly reduced case-fatality rate and WHO scale score. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: No funding was used for this work. REGISTRATION: A prospective register was recorded in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the number CRD42023479007.

Cardiovascular disease and prevention among people living with HIV in South Florida.

ABSTRACT: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has improved survival of patients living with HIV (PLWH); however, this has been accompanied by an increase in cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although preventative measures for CVD among the general population are well described, information is limited about CVD prevention among PLWH. The goal of this study was to characterize the prevalence of CVD in our population and to assess the use of primary and secondary prevention.We performed a retrospective review of PLWH receiving primary care at a large academic center in Miami, Florida. We characterized the prevalence of CVD, CVD risk, and the use of aspirin and statins for primary and secondary CVD prevention.A total of 985 charts were reviewed (45% women, 55% men). Average age was 52.2 years. Average CD4 count was 568 cells/microL. 92.9% were receiving ART, and 71% were virologically suppressed. The median 10-year ASCVD risk was 7.3%. The prevalence of CVD was 10.4% (N = 102). The odds of having CVD was lower in patients on ART (OR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25-0.90, P = .02). The use of medications for primary and secondary prevention of CVD based on current guidelines was low: 15% and 37% for aspirin respectively, and 25% and 44% for statins.CVD risk and rates of CVD are high among PLWH and receiving ART could protect against CVD. However, the use of medications for primary and secondary prevention is low. Increased awareness of CVD risk-reduction strategies is needed among providers of PLWH to decrease the burden of CVD.

Gender Identity, Hormone Therapy, and Cardiovascular Disease Risk.

Transgender individuals represent a medically underserved and under researched population. There is a growing number of studies illustrating the importance of hormone therapy treatments in transgender men and women to assist ameliorating gender dysphoria and promoting well-being. However, the cardiovascular effects of these hormones are controversial. Large longitudinal epidemiological studies of cardiovascular event outcomes in these populations do not exist. In addition, studies of cardiovascular complications of transgender hormone therapy are limited in number and complicated by poor control of medication regimen, presence of gender confirming surgery, use of prescribed medications for prevailing conditions, and alcohol, smoking or illicit substance use, and comorbidities, such as HIV infection. The following provides an overview of current guidelines for hormone therapy regimens used by transgender individuals, as well as what is known about the use of exogenous hormones on the cardiovascular system and cardiovascular disease risk. Several gaps in our understanding of the cardiovascular effects of endogenous and exogenous hormones in treated transgender individuals are identified, which provide direction for future study.

Vascular effects of nebivolol added to hydrochlorothiazide in African Americans with hypertension and echocardiographic evidence of diastolic dysfunction: the NASAA study.

BACKGROUND: African Americans have greater risk of cardiovascular events than comparator populations of white European origin. A potential reason for this is reduced nitric oxide bioavailability in African Americans, resulting in increased prevalence of factors that contribute to ventricular dysfunction. We investigated the effects of nebivolol with the diuretic hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in hypertensive African Americans with echocardiographic evidence of diastolic dysfunction. METHODS: A total of 42 African American patients were assigned to nebivolol and HCTZ in an open-label fashion for a 24-week period. Changes in blood pressure (BP), echocardiographic parameters, and success in attaining target BP were determined. As an indirect determinant of endothelial function, serum total nitric oxide (NOx) levels and asymmetric dimethyl arginine (ADMA) levels were performed at baseline and after the treatment period. RESULTS: The systolic BP decreased from 150 ± 13 to 136 ± 16 mm Hg (P < .005). Diastolic BP decreased from 94 ± 13 to 84 ± 9 mm Hg (P = .008). Of the patients that completed the study, 77% achieved a combined target BP of systolic BP <140 mm Hg and a diastolic BP <90 mm Hg. Serum NOx increased by 41% and 39% in patients that were treated with 10 mg and 20 mg daily nebivolol, respectively. The ADMA levels decreased by 44% following treatment. The change in systolic BP was strongly correlated to the change in ADMA (r = .54; P = .024). Furthermore, in comparison to a group of age-matched patients controlled with diuretic therapy only, the ADMA levels were significantly lower in the nebivolol posttreatment group (controlled BP with diuretic: 0.32 ± 0.07µmol/L; nebivolol posttreatment: 0.24 ± 0.06 µmol/L; P < .05). CONCLUSION: Reduced BP with nebivolol in hypertensive African Americans and echocardiographic evidence of diastolic dysfunction correlates with improved endothelial function. Furthermore, improvement in endothelial function and increased nitric oxide bioavailability suggests a potential mechanism of efficacy of nebivolol in these patients.

The impact of lipoic acid on endothelial function and proteinuria in quinapril-treated diabetic patients with stage I hypertension: results from the QUALITY study.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine whether a combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and the nutraceutical α-lipoic acid (ALA) regulates blood pressure, endothelial function, and proteinuria in diabetic patients with Stage I hypertension. METHODS: A total of 40 diabetic patients with Stage I hypertension were treated in a crossover double-blinded manner. Patients were administered quinapril ([QUI] 40 mg/d) for 8 weeks or QUI + ALA (600 mg/d) for 8 weeks. Measurements included blood pressure, 24-hour collection of urinary albumin, and endothelial-dependent flow-mediated dilation (FMD). RESULTS: There was a change of metabolic parameters in both study groups after 8 weeks of therapy. In comparison to baseline, the 24-hour urinary albumin significantly decreased by 30% in the QUI group (P = .018, time comparison) and 53% in QUI + ALA group (P < .005, time and group comparison). Also, when compared with baseline, FMD significantly increased by 58% in QUI group (P < .005, time comparison) and by 116% in QUI + ALA group (P < .005, time and group comparison). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure reduced significantly by 10% with QUI treatment. There was no further blood pressure reduction when patients were administered both QUI and ALA. CONCLUSIONS: In diabetic patients with hypertension, QUI reduces blood pressure, proteinuria, and improves endothelial function. Moreover, this effect is strongly potentiated with a combination of QUI and ALA. These results may attenuate the progression of vascular pathophysiology seen in patients with a combination of diabetes and hypertension.

Is there a role for pleiotropic effects of atorvastatin and fenofibrate in the metabolic syndrome and prediabetes?

Evaluation of: Krysiak R, Gdula-Dymek A, Bachowski R, Okopien B. Pleiotropic effects of atorvastatin and fenofibrate in metabolic syndrome and different types of prediabetes. Diabetes Care 33(10), 2266-2270 (2010). The beneficial use of fibrates and statins has been observed in previous studies among patients with dyslipidemia, including those with glucose metabolism abnormalities. The paper under evaluation highlights these benefits and provides insight. Specifically, these findings are observed in patients who have prediabetes and metabolic syndrome (MS), and are taking atorvastatin or fenofibrate. The paper documents that both drugs have multiple pleiotropic effects on MS patients. Furthermore, these effects may be determined by prediabetes type. The results strengthen previous knowledge and offer new understanding, as no previous study has investigated whether the type of prediabetes can determine extra-lipid effects and cardiovascular risk factors in MS patients.