ABSTRACT
Background: Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) is diagnosed by Japanese Epidemiological Survey of Refractory Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis (JESREC) scoring system and histopathological eosinophil counts of dissected nasal polyps. Patients with low JESREC score and small number of tissue eosinophils are diagnosed with non-ECRS (NECRS). Due to the 2 parameters of this diagnostic system, chronic rhinosinusitis is to be divided to 4 groups and some patients fall into the 2 groups other than ECRS and NECRS: probable ECRS (pECRS) and probable non-ECRS (pNECRS). We attempted to clarify clinical and histopathological similarities and differences, especially concerning major basic protein (MBP), among those groups. Methods: One hundred twenty-eight patients treated by endoscopic sinus surgery was included. Clinical characteristics were compared among each group, and immunohistological analysis for MBP was performed to 35 randomly selected patients. MBP deposition at intra mucosal epithelium was evaluated by semiquantificational approach. Results: ECRS patients showed significantly higher comorbidity rate with allergic rhinitis (36 patients, 78.3%), asthma (36 patients, 78.3%) compared with other groups. Also, percentage of the patients complaining olfactory dysfunction (42 patients, 91.3%) was significantly higher (p < 0.001). Lund-Mackay score (mean, 14.5; 6-24) and recurrence rate (27 patients, 61.4%) was the highest in ECRS patients. Regarding pECRS, the number of patients with olfactory dysfunction (5 patients, 55.6%) was higher than pNECRS and NECRS groups. Also, comorbidity of asthma and percentage of blood eosinophils tended to be higher than those 2 groups. MBP score of pECRS group was significantly higher than NECRS (p < 0.05), despite of smaller tissue eosinophil counts. Conclusion: pECRS might share some characteristics with ECRS although tissue eosinophil count was significantly smaller compared with ECRS. The results of this study have shown that MBP score in pECRS nasal polyps was significantly higher than NECRS patients and close to ECRS. That might suggest that eosinophils have existed in the nasal polyps of pPECRS patients at some point before surgery.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic otitis media (EOM) is an intractable middle ear disease often associated with eosinophilic inflammatory airway conditions. Recently, dendritic cells (DCs) have been indicated as an essential component of Th2 allergic inflammation, such as bronchial asthma. DCs are activated by thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), an epithelial cell-derived cytokine. However, the relationship between TSLP and DCs in EOM remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between DCs and TSLP and to determine the involvement of DCs in EOM in an animal model. METHODS: Hartley guinea pigs were used as the animal model. Daily ovalbumin (OVA) stimulation of the middle ear was performed for 7 or 14 days. The temporal bone was dissected on the last day of stimulation, and paraffin-embedded sections were prepared. Immunostaining and immunofluorostaining for TSLP receptor (TSLPR) and CD11c, a surface marker of DCs, were performed. RESULTS: We found CD11c-immunopositive cells in the submucosal area of the middle ear epithelium, particularly around the eustachian tube. TSLPR-immunopositive cells exhibited a similar distribution as CD11c-positive cells. CONCLUSION: CD11c positive DCs coexpressing TSLPR were recruited after OVA challenge which might activate Th2 allergic reaction.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we aimed to clarify the expression of thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), a key trigger of Th2-type allergic disease, in the middle ear mucosa of eosinophilic otitis media (EOM). METHODS: An immunohistological study of TSLP was conducted in patients with EOM and in animal models of EOM constructed by intraperitoneal and intratympanic injection of ovalbumin for 7 and 14 days. In addition, the messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of TSLP in the middle ear mucosa of the animal models was analyzed using real-time PCR, and was compared with that of the control animals. RESULTS: Immunoreactivities for TSLP were observed in the middle ear mucosa around the tympanic ostium of the eustachian tube of patients with EOM. In the animal model, strong immunoreactivity for TSLP was also observed in the eustachian tube epithelium, and mRNA expression of TSLP in the seven-day stimulated animals was significantly higher than that in the controls. CONCLUSION: The present study indicates that the presence of epithelium-derived TSLP in the eustachian tubes plays an important role in the onset of EOM.
