ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As the proportion of older people increases, so will the consumption of health services. The aim of this study was to describe the contact characteristics among older people and to identify factors associated with the degree of urgency at the Norwegian out-of-hours (OOH) emergency primary health care services. METHODS: Inhabitants aged ≥70 years who contacted the OOH service during 2014-2017 in seven OOH districts in Norway were included. We investigated the variables sex, age, time of contact, mode of contact, ICPC-2 based reason for encounter (RFE), priority degree and initial response. We also performed frequency analyses, rate calculations and a log-binomial regression. RESULTS: A total of 38,293 contacts were registered. The contact rate/1000 inhabitants/year was three times higher in the oldest age group (≥90 years) compared to the youngest age group (70-74 years). Direct attendance accounted for 8.4% of the contacts and 32.8% were telephone contacts from health professionals. The most frequent RFE chapter used was "A General and unspecified" (21.0%) which also showed an increasing rate with higher age. 6.0% of the contacts resulted in a home visit from a doctor. Variables significantly associated with urgent priority degree were RFEs regarding cardiovascular (Relative risk (RR) 1.85; CI 1.74-1.96), neurological (RR 1.55; CI 1.36-1.77), respiratory (RR 1.40; CI 1.30-1.51) and digestive (RR 1.22; CI 1.10-1.34) issues. In addition, telephone calls from health professionals (RR 1.21; CI 1.12-1.31), direct attendance (RR 1.13; CI 1.04-1.22), contacts on weekdays (RR 1.13; CI 1.06-1.20) and contacts from men (RR 1.13; CI 1.09-1.17) were significantly associated with urgent priority degree. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important information about the Norwegian older inhabitants' contact with the OOH emergency primary health care services. There are a wide variety of RFEs, and the contact rate is high and increases with higher age. Telephone contact is most common. The OOH staff frequently identify older people as having "general and unspecified" reasons for encounters. OOH nursing staff would benefit from having screening tools and enhanced geriatric training to best support this vulnerable group when these individuals call the OOH service.
Subject(s)
After-Hours Care , Emergency Service, Hospital , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Primary Health Care , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emergencies , Emergency Medical Services , Female , House Calls , Humans , Male , Norway , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Purpose: To explore if preoperative patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) provides additional prognostic value as a supplement to other preoperatively known clinical factors in patients with high-grade glioma (HGG).Methods: In a prospective explorative study, 114 patients with high-grade glioma were included. The participants completed the generic HRQoL questionnaire EQ-5D 3L, and the disease-specific questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 1-3 days before surgery. Operating neurosurgeons scored the patient's preoperative functional level by using Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify HRQoL domains that were associated with survival. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Log-rank tests were used to visualize differences in survival between groups.Results: In addition to preoperative KPS and age, the EORTC QLQ-BN20 subdomains 'seizures' (HR 0.98, p < .006), 'itchy skin' (HR 1.01, p < .036) and 'bladder control' (HR 1.01, p < .023) were statistically significant independent predictors of survival in a multivariate cox model.Conclusions: Our results suggest that in patients with HGG, certain preoperative symptom scales within EORTC QLQ-BN20 may provide additional prognostic information to supplement other clinical prognostic factors. However, further studies are required to validate our findings. Overall the instruments EQ-5D 3L and EORTC QLQ-C30 do not seem to provide much additional valuable prognostic information to already known prognostic factors.
