Measurement of maternal serum amyloid A as a novel marker of preterm birth.

OBJECTIVE: To study the association between maternal serum amyloid A (mSAA) levels and preterm birth (PTB). METHODS: This prospective observational nested case control study was conducted at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, between May 2017 and December 2017. The study recruited pregnant women at 26-34 weeks presented with threatened preterm labor (PTL). Women with PTB were included in cases group while control group included women who continued pregnancy and delivered at term. Serum samples were collected to measure mSAA levels. The main outcome of the study was the association between mSAA levels and PTB. Secondary outcomes included neonatal intensive care unit admissions and neonatal mortality. RESULTS: Fifty-eight women were included in the final analysis (29 in each group). Women with PTB had a statistically significant higher mSAA levels [5.1 (4.5-7.7) vs. 1.2 (0.0-2.5) mg/l, for cases and controls respectively, p < .001]. Higher mSAA levels were also observed among women whose babies were admitted to NICU, but there was no significant relation between mSAA level and neonatal death. A statistically significant negative correlation was found between mSAA and gestational age at delivery and neonatal birth weight. mSAA had an excellent value to predict PTB (AUC = 0.972 [95% CI, 0.891-0.998], p < .0001), fair value to predict admission to NICU and a poor value to predict neonatal death. CONCLUSIONS: mSAA level was found to be elevated among women with threatened PTL who end with PTB; mSAA is a potentially useful predictive marker of PTB that warrant further study. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01639027.

Maternal serum amyloid A level as a novel marker of primary unexplained recurrent early pregnancy loss.

OBJECTIVE: To assess maternal serum amyloid A (SAA) levels among women with primary unexplained recurrent early pregnancy loss (REPL). METHODS: A prospective study was conducted among women with missed spontaneous abortion in the first trimester at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, between January 21 and December 25, 2014. Women with at least two consecutive primary unexplained REPLs and no previous live births were enrolled. A control group was formed of women with no history of REPL who had at least one previous uneventful pregnancy with no adverse outcomes. Serum samples were collected to measure SAA levels. The main outcome was the association between SAA and primary unexplained REPL. RESULTS: Each group contained 96 participants. Median SAA level was significantly higher among women with REPL (50.0 µg/mL, interquartile range 26.0-69.0) than among women in the control group (11.6 µg/mL, interquartile range 6.2-15.5; P<0.001). The SAA level was an independent indicator of primary unexplained REPL, after adjusting for maternal age and gestational age (odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.19; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Elevated SAA levels found among women with primary unexplained REPL could represent a novel biomarker for this complication of pregnancy.

Intraumbilical injection of three different uterotonics in the management of retained placenta.

AIM: The aim of this work was to compare the effect of intraumbilical injection of three different uterotonic solutions in the management of retained placenta. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in Ain-Shams University Maternity Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. A total of 78 women with retained placenta (>30 min after delivery of the fetus) were included in the study and subdivided into three groups. Each group was injected with a different type of uterotonic into the umbilical vein after clamping it using the Pipingas technique. Uterotonics used were either 20 IU oxytocin dissolved in 30 mL saline (n=26), ergometrine 0.2 mg dissolved in 30 mL saline (n=27) or misoprostol 800 µg dissolved in 30 mL saline (n=25). RESULTS: The overall success rate of spontaneous placental separation within 30 min after intraumbilical injection of uterotonics was 56/78 (71.79%). The success rate was higher with misoprostol when compared to oxytocin and ergometrine but the difference was not significant (20/25 [80%], 19/26 [73.08%], 17/27 [62.96%], respectively, P>0.05). The injection-to-separation interval was significantly shorter in the misoprostol group than in the oxytocin and ergometrine groups (7.0±2.2 min, 13.14±3.76 min, 22.5±4.37 min, respectively, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Intraumbilical injection of uterotonics, namely oxytocin, ergometrine and dissolved misoprostol in saline, are closely effective in the management of retained placenta, with misoprostol being slightly more effective. This method may have a role in minimizing the need for manual removal of the placenta and its adverse sequelae.