Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf ; 80(11 Suppl 3): 3-9, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34820629

ABSTRACT

Robotic-assisted surgery has become a desired modality for performing colectomy; however, unplanned conversion to an open procedure may be associated with worse outcomes. The purpose of this study is to examine predictors and consequences of unplanned conversion to open in a large, high fidelity data set. A retrospective analysis of 11 061 robotic colectomies was conducted using the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) 2012-2017 database. Predictors of conversion and the effect of conversion on outcomes were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression resulting in risk-adjusted odds ratios of conversion and morbidity/mortality. Overall, 10 372 (93.8%) patients underwent successful robotic colectomy, and 689 (6.2%) had an unplanned conversion. Predictors of conversion included age ≥ 65 years, male gender, obesity, functional status not independent, American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) classification IV-V, non-oncologic indication, emergency case, smoking, recent weight loss, bleeding disorder, and preoperative organ space infection. Conversion is an independent risk factor for mortality, overall morbidity, cardiac morbidity, pulmonary morbidity, renal morbidity, venous thromboembolism morbidity, wound morbidity, sepsis, bleeding, readmission, return to the operating room, and extended length of stay (LOS). Unplanned conversion to open during robotic colectomy is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality.


Subject(s)
Robotic Surgical Procedures , Aged , Colectomy/adverse effects , Colectomy/methods , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Quality Improvement , Retrospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , United States
2.
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf ; 79(3): 71-74, 2020 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32190838

ABSTRACT

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a commonly performed surgery, with candidates often requiring bilateral replacement. Simultaneous, single-stage bilateral THA offers several advantages and the direct anterior approach (DAA) for THA is well-suited for this procedure. In Hawai'i, single-stage bilateral DAA THA has yet to be adopted as a primary practice, and currently, there is limited research on patient outcomes following single-stage bilateral DAA THA in heterogeneous patient populations. In this study, we present our experience regarding intraoperative and 90-day complication rates encountered in a consecutive, all-inclusive cohort of single-stage bilateral DAA THA performed at the Straub Medical Center in Honolulu, Hawai'i, from January 2016 to May 2018. A total of 99 patients were included with a mean age of 64.7 ± 10.1 (mean ± standard deviation) years. The sample consisted of 43 (43.4%) males. Mean BMI was 27.0 ± 5.3 kg/m2. The racial composition consisted of 50 (50.5%) Asian, 37 (37.4%) Caucasian, 8 (8.1%) Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, 1 (1.0%) African-American, 3 (3.0%) undisclosed. Mean operating time was 180 ± 23 minutes. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 386 ± 75 mL, and 11 (11.1%) patients received a postoperative allogenic blood transfusion. There were no major intraoperative complications. The only major local complication observed was one patient who developed high-grade heterotopic ossification requiring surgery. No major systemic complications occurred. The overall complication rate was 0.5%. In conclusion, we demonstrate that single-stage bilateral DAA THA is a safe option for the treatment of bilateral hip pathology in a wide spectrum of patients.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Aged , Female , Hawaii , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Postoperative Period , Retrospective Studies
3.
Am J Surg ; 218(6): 1223-1228, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31500797

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Utilization of robotic-assistance for esophagectomy is increasing. The differences in outcomes between robotic-assisted minimally-invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) and non-robotic minimally-invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer are unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare 30-day postoperative outcomes between RAMIE and MIE. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the ACS-NSQIP 2016-2017 databases. Primary outcome was 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: 725 minimally-invasive cases were identified, which included 100 RAMIE and 625 MIE. RAMIE was not found to be a risk factor for postoperative mortality (OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.38-6.00, p = 0.5675) or overall morbidity (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.40-1.06, p = 0.0818). No significant differences were found between groups for systemic, organ-specific, or surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference was found in the incidence of 30-day postoperative outcomes between RAMIE and MIE. In comparison to MIE, RAMIE may be considered a feasible but non-superior option for treatment of esophageal cancer.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagectomy/methods , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Aged , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...