Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Neurol ; 57(8): 1171-6, 2000 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10927797

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The El Escorial and the revised Airlie House diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) classify patients into categories reflecting different levels of diagnostic certainty. We conducted a prospective, population-based study of the natural course of ALS in the Republic of Ireland during a 6-year period to examine the utility of these ALS diagnostic criteria. METHODS: Using data from the Irish ALS Register, we studied the clinical features of all patients diagnosed as having ALS in Ireland throughout their illness. RESULTS: Between 1993 and 1998, 388 patients were diagnosed as having ALS. Forty percent of patients reported bulbar-onset symptoms. Disease progression occurred over time: at last follow-up, 75% of all patients had bulbar signs, compared with 59% at diagnosis. When the El Escorial criteria were applied, more than half of patients (218 [56%]) had definite or probable ALS at diagnosis. Of the 165 possible and suspected ALS cases at diagnosis (trial ineligible), 110 (67%) were trial eligible at last follow-up. Of the 254 patients who had died, 229 (90%) had definite or probable ALS, whereas 25 patients (10%) remained trial ineligible at death. El Escorial category at diagnosis was not a significant prognostic indicator. Use of the Airlie House criteria had no effect on the median time from symptom onset to trial eligibility (12.9 vs 12.8 months). CONCLUSIONS: The El Escorial and Airlie House diagnostic criteria are excessively restrictive. Furthermore, levels of diagnostic certainty cannot be used as prognostic indicators. Arch Neurol. 2000;57:1171-1176


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/diagnosis , Decision Trees , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/mortality , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Ireland/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Registries , Survival Analysis
2.
Biochem Pharmacol ; 35(19): 3255-60, 1986 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3094536

ABSTRACT

The selective monoamine oxidase inhibitors clorgyline and (-)-deprenyl have been used to determine the activities of monoamine oxidase-A and -B towards tryptamine in several human tissues. The results were compared with those obtained with the A-form-selective substrate 5-hydroxytryptamine, the B-form-selective substrate 2-phenethylamine and the common substrate tyramine. Tryptamine was found to be a substrate for both forms of the enzyme in human liver, kidney cortex and medulla and in seven different brain regions. The Km values of the two forms towards this substrate were similar in all the human tissues examined but the maximum velocities differed. Thus the A-form would contribute approximately 50% of the total monoamine oxidase activity towards this substrate in human cerebral cortex, whereas it would contribute about 60% in kidney cortex and medulla and 75% in liver. These results suggest that both forms of monoamine oxidase would contribute to the metabolism of tryptamine in human tissues and are difficult to reconcile with suggestions that tryptamine excretion may provide a simple index of monoamine oxidase-A inhibition.


Subject(s)
Monoamine Oxidase/metabolism , Tryptamines/metabolism , Brain/enzymology , Clorgyline/pharmacology , Humans , Kidney/enzymology , Kinetics , Liver/enzymology , Oxidation-Reduction , Selegiline/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...