Can expelled cells/debris from a developing embryo be used for PGT?

BACKGROUND: Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is offered to a wide range of structural and numerical chromosomal imbalances, with PGT- polymerase chain reaction (PCR), as the method of choice for amplifying the small DNA content achieved from the blastomere biopsy or trophectoderm (TE) biopsy, that might have a detrimental impact on embryonic implantation potential. Since human embryos cultured until Day-5-6 were noticed to expel cell debris/ fragments within the zona pellucida, we aimed to examine whether these cell debris/ fragments might be used for PGT, as an alternative to embryo biopsy. METHODS: Blastocysts, which their Day-3 blastomere biopsy revealed an affected embryo with single-gene defect, and following hatching leaved cell debris/fragments within the zona pellucida were analyzed. Each blastocyst and its corresponding cell debris/fragments were separated and underwent the same molecular analysis, based on multiplex PCR programs designed for haplotyping using informative microsatellites markers. The main outcome measure was the intra-embryo congruity of Day-3 blastomere biopsy and its corresponding blastocyst and cell debris/fragments. RESULTS: Fourteen affected embryos from 9 women were included. Only 8/14 (57.2%) of embryos demonstrated congruent molecular genetic results between Day-3 embryo and its corresponding blastocyst and cell debris/fragments. In additional 6/14 (42.8%) embryos, molecular results of the Day-3 embryos and their corresponding blastocysts were congruent, while the cell debris/fragments yielded no molecular diagnoses (incomplete diagnoses). CONCLUSIONS: It might be therefore concluded, that in PGT cycles, examining the cell debris/fragments on Day-4, instead of Day-3 blastomere or Day-5 TE biopsies, is feasible and might avoid embryo biopsy with its consequent detrimental effect on embryos' implantation potential. Whenever the latter results in incomplete diagnosis, TE biopsy should be carried out on Day-5 for final genetic results. Further large well-designed studies are required to validate the aforementioned PGT platform.

Timing day-3 vitrification for PGT-M embryos: pre- or post-blastomere biopsy?

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and clinical outcomes of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M), following blastomere biopsy prior or following vitrification. METHODS: A cohort-historical study of all consecutive patients admitted to IVF in a large tertiary center for PGT-M and PCR cycle from September 2016 to March 2020. Patients were divided into 4 groups: Group A1 consisted of patients undergoing day-3 embryos biopsy followed by a fresh transfer of unaffected embryos. Group A2 consisted of Group A1 patients that their surplus unaffected embryos were vitrified, thawed, and transferred in a subsequent FET cycle. Group B1 consisted of patients that their day-3 embryos were vitrified intact (without biopsy) for a subsequent FET cycle. Later embryos were thawed and underwent blastomere biopsies, and the unaffected embryos were transferred, while the surplus unaffected embryos were re-vitrified for a subsequent FET cycle. Group B2 consisted of Group B1 patients that their surplus unaffected embryos were re-vitrified, thawed, and transferred in a subsequent FET cycle. The laboratory data and clinical results were collected and compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 368 patients underwent 529 PGT-M cycles in our center: 347 with day-3 embryos biopsied before undergoing vitrification (Group A1) and 182 following vitrification and thawing (Group B1). There were no between group differences in embryo survival rate post-thawing, nor the ongoing implantation and pregnancy rates. CONCLUSION: In PGT-M cycles, the timing of embryos vitrification, whether prior or following blastomere biopsy, has no detrimental effect on post-thawing embryo survival rate, nor their potential ongoing implantation and pregnancy rates.

Selection of antibodies from synthetic antibody libraries.

More than 2 dozen years had passed since the field of antibody engineering was established, with the first reports of bacterial [1-3] and mammalian cells [4] expression of recombinant antibody fragments, and in that time a lot of effort was dedicated to the development of efficient technological means, intended to assist in the creation of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Research focus was given to two intertwined technological aspects: the selection platform and the recombinant antibody repertoires. In accordance with these areas of interest, it is the goal of this chapter to describe the various selection tools and antibody libraries existing, with emphasis on the later, and their applications. This chapter gives a far from exhaustive, subjective "historic account" of the field, describing the selection platforms, the different formats of antibody repertoires and the applications of both for selecting recombinant antibodies. Several excellent books provide detailed protocols for constructing antibody libraries and selecting antibodies from those libraries [5-13]. Such books may guide a newcomer to the field in the fine details of antibody engineering. We would like to offer advice to the novice: although seemingly simple, effective library construction and antibody isolation provide best benefits in the hands of professionals. It is an art as much as it is science.