CD44-SNA1 integrated cytopathology for delineation of high grade dysplastic and neoplastic oral lesions.

The high prevalence of oral potentially-malignant disorders exhibits diverse severity and risk of malignant transformation, which mandates a Point-of-Care diagnostic tool. Low patient compliance for biopsies underscores the need for minimally-invasive diagnosis. Oral cytology, an apt method, is not clinically applicable due to a lack of definitive diagnostic criteria and subjective interpretation. The primary objective of this study was to identify and evaluate the efficacy of biomarkers for cytology-based delineation of high-risk oral lesions. A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of biomarkers recognized a panel of markers (n: 10) delineating dysplastic oral lesions. In this observational cross sectional study, immunohistochemical validation (n: 131) identified a four-marker panel, CD44, Cyclin D1, SNA-1, and MAA, with the best sensitivity (>75%; AUC>0.75) in delineating benign, hyperplasia, and mild-dysplasia (Low Risk Lesions; LRL) from moderate-severe dysplasia (High Grade Dysplasia: HGD) along with cancer. Independent validation by cytology (n: 133) showed that expression of SNA-1 and CD44 significantly delineate HGD and cancer with high sensitivity (>83%). Multiplex validation in another cohort (n: 138), integrated with a machine learning model incorporating clinical parameters, further improved the sensitivity and specificity (>88%). Additionally, image automation with SNA-1 profiled data set also provided a high sensitivity (sensitivity: 86%). In the present study, cytology with a two-marker panel, detecting aberrant glycosylation and a glycoprotein, provided efficient risk stratification of oral lesions. Our study indicated that use of a two-biomarker panel (CD44/SNA-1) integrated with clinical parameters or SNA-1 with automated image analysis (Sensitivity >85%) or multiplexed two-marker panel analysis (Sensitivity: >90%) provided efficient risk stratification of oral lesions, indicating the significance of biomarker-integrated cytopathology in the development of a Point-of-care assay.

Oral epithelial cell segmentation from fluorescent multichannel cytology images using deep learning.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cytology is a proven, minimally-invasive cancer screening and surveillance strategy. Given the high incidence of oral cancer globally, there is a need to develop a point-of-care, automated, cytology-based screening tool. Oral cytology image analysis has multiple challenges such as, presence of debris, blood cells, artefacts, and clustered cells, which necessitate a skilled expertise for single-cell detection of atypical cells for diagnosis. The main objective of this study is to develop a semantic segmentation model for Single Epithelial Cell (SEC) separation from fluorescent, multichannel, microscopic oral cytology images and classify the segmented images. METHODS: We have used multi-channel, fluorescent, microscopic images (number of images; n = 2730), which were stained differentially for cytoplasm and nucleus. The cytoplasmic and cell membrane markers used in the study were Mackia Amurensis Agglutinin (MAA; n: 2364) and Sambucus Nigra Agglutinin-1 (SNA-1; n: 366) with a nuclear stain DAPI. The cytology images were labelled for SECs, cluster of cells, artefacts, and blood cells. In this study, we used encoder-decoder models based on the well-established U-Net architecture, modified U-Net and ResNet-34 for multi-class segmentation. The experiments were performed with different class combinations of data to reduce imbalance. The derived MAA dataset (n: 14,706) of SEC, cluster, and artefacts/blood cells were used for developing a classification model. InceptionV3 model and a new custom Convolutional-Neural-Network (CNN) model (Artefact-Net) were trained to classify SNA-1 marker stained segmented images (n:6101). For segmentation models, Intersection Over Union (IoU) and F1 score were used as the evaluation matrices, while the classification models were evaluated using the conventional classification metrics like precision, recall and F1-Score. RESULTS: The U-Net and the modified U-Net models gave the best IoU overall (0.73-0.76) as well as for SEC segmentation (079). The images segmented using the modified U-Net model were classified by Artefact-Net and Inception V3 model with F1 scores of 0.96 and 0.95 respectively. The Artefact-Net, when compared to InceptionV3, provided a better precision and F1 score in classifying clusters (Precision: 0.91 vs 0.80; F1: 0.91 vs 0.86). CONCLUSION: This study establishes a pipeline for SEC segmentation with the segmented component containing only single cells. The pipline will enable automated, cytology-based early detection with reduced bias.