Male Youth Ice Hockey Concussion Incidence in a USA Hockey Membership-Adjusted Population: A Peak in 2011 and the Impact of Major Rule Changes.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of youth ice hockey-related concussions preceding and following the implementation of new body-checking and head contact rules by USA hockey in 2011. We hypothesized a decrease in concussions after the rule change. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: United States emergency department (ED) data queried in the National Electronic InjurySurveillance System (NEISS). PATIENTS: National Electronic Injury Surveillance System reported male youth (≤18 years) ice hockey concussion cases from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2016. In total, 848 players were diagnosed with concussion, representing a national estimate of 17 374 cases. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Time, specifically years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidences and incidence rates (measured per 10 000 person-years) of male youth ice hockey concussions. Annual trends were analyzed using descriptive and linear or polynomial regression analysis. RESULTS: The national estimate of youth ice hockey-related concussions seen in US emergency departments (EDs) increased significantly from 656 in 2007 to 2042 in 2011 (P < 0.01). During the same period, their respective incidence increased significantly from 21.8 to 66.8 per 10 000, before dropping through 2016 (P < 0.05). After 2011, concussions decreased from 1965 in 2012 to 1292 in 2016 (P = 0.055). The gap in concussion incidence between the 11 to 12 and 13 to 14 divisions widened after 2011 (before 2011: 41 vs 49 per 10 000 person-years [P = 0.80]; after 2011: 45 and 89, respectively [P < 0.01]). CONCLUSIONS: US EDs experienced a significant increase in youth ice hockey concussion visits from 2007 to 2011. After the 2011 rule changes, concussion visits decreased significantly from 2012 to 2016.

Trends and epidemiology of radial head subluxation in the United States from 2004 to 2018.

BACKGROUND: Increased body mass may predispose children to a greater risk for radial head subluxation (RHS). Recent studies in the literature have reported a plateau in obesity prevalence among infants and toddlers. This study sought to examine recent epidemiological trends in RHS incidence from 2004 to 2018 using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database to determine how obesity patterns may affect RHS incidence. METHODS: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database was queried for patients 6 years of age or younger presenting with radial head subluxation between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2018. Patient demographics, mechanisms of injury, and location of injury were recorded. RESULTS: An estimated total 253,578 children 6 years or younger were treated for RHS with 14,204 (95% CI = 8124-20,284) in 2004 to 21,408 (95% CI = 12,882-29,934) in 2018. The overall annual rate of RHS per 10,000 children ≤ 6 years was 6.03 (95% CI = 4.85-7.58). The annual rate of RHS per 10,000 children ≤ 6 years increased (m = 0.200, ß = 0.802, p < 0.001) from 5.18 (95% CI 2.96-7.39) in 2004 to 7.69 (95% CI = 4.63-10.75) in 2018. The most common mechanism associated with RHS was falls (39.4%) with 103,466 (95% CI 74,806-132,125) cases. Pulls accounted for the second most common mechanism of injury, accounting for 90,146 (95% CI 68,274-112,018) cases or 36.2%. Yearly RHS incidence was compared to obesity prevalence for ages 2-5 children provided by the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES) surveys. Changes in obesity prevalence may visually reflect RHS incidence trends, but no causality between obesity prevalence and RHS incidence could be confirmed. CONCLUSION: This study corroborated previous findings that falls and arm pulling contribute to the vast majority of RHS cases. The nonsignificant rise in RHS cases may reflect a possible plateau in obesity prevalence of children aged 2-5 years in recent years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Comparing Relative Value Units among Shoulder Arthroplasty, Hemiarthroplasty, and ORIF for Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly: Which is Most Worth Your Time?

BACKGROUND: Relative value units (RVUs) are assigned to Current Procedural Technology (CPT) codes and give relative economic values to the services physicians provide. This study compared the RVU reimbursements for the surgical options of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly, which include arthroplasty (reverse [RSA] and total [TSA]), hemiarthroplasty (HA), and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, a total of 1,437 patients of at least 65 years of age with proximal humerus fractures between 2008 and 2016 were identified. Of those, 259 underwent RSA/TSA (CPT code 23472), 418 underwent HA (CPT codes 23470 and 23616), and 760 underwent ORIF (CPT code 23615). Univariate analysis compared RVU per minute, reimbursement rate, and the average annual revenue across cohorts based on respective operative times. RESULTS: RSA/TSA generated a mean RVU per minute of 0.197 (SD 0.078; 95%CI [0.188, 0.207]), which was significantly greater than the mean RVU per minute for 23470 HA (0.156; SD 0.057; 95%CI [0.148, 0.163]), 23616 HA (0.166; SD 0.065; 95%CI [0.005, 0.156]), and ORIF (0.135; SD 0.048; 95%CI [0.132, 0.138]; P<0.001). This converted to respective reimbursement rates of $6.97/min (SD 2.78; 95%CI [6.63, 7.31]), $5.48/min (SD 2.05; 95%CI [5.22, 5.74]), $5.83/min (SD 2.28; 95%CI [5.49, 6.16]) and $4.74/min (SD 1.69; 95%CI [4.62, 4.87]). After extrapolation, respective average annual revenues were $580,386, $456,633, $475,077, and $395,608. CONCLUSION: RSA/TSA provides significantly greater reimbursement rates compared to HA and ORIF. Orthopaedic surgeons can use this information to optimize daily procedural cost-effectiveness in their practices.

Evaluating success rate and comparing complications of operative techniques used to treat chronic syndesmosis injuries.

PURPOSE: To assess the success rate and complications of the surgical interventions used to manage chronic syndesmosis injuries. METHODS: Multiple online databases were queried to identify studies reporting operative intervention for chronic syndesmosis injuries. RESULTS: Modalities of operative fixation include suture-button fixation, arthroscopy and debridement, as well as arthrodesis. The use of operative treatment is effective; however, more direct comparison studies are necessary to evaluate the efficacy of each treatment. CONCLUSION: Various operative procedures have been used for the management of chronic syndesmotic injuries but further prospective studies are necessary to determine the type of treatment that should be indicated.