ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess the maternal and neonatal outcomes of repeated trials of labor after one previous cesarean section. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified and reviewed the records of all women who had had a trial of labor after cesarean section at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia between January 1, 2011, and December 30, 2018. The inclusion criteria were women with singleton vertex pregnancies between 24 and 42 weeks of gestation and a trial of labor after one cesarean section. The exclusion criteria were two or more previous cesarean sections, intrauterine fetal demise, breech presentation, labor induction, estimated fetal weight >4 kg, and classical or low vertical uterine incision. The pregnancy outcomes of these women were compared according to the number of trials of labor after cesarean section. RESULTS: During the study period, 1139 women met the inclusion criteria. The number of women with previous zero, one, two, or three or more trials of labor after cesarean section were 669 (58.7%), 237 (20.8%), 132 (11.6%), and 101 (8.9%), respectively. There were statistically significant trends between the four groups in age, nationality, gravidity, and parity but not in the booking status, BMI, or the hemoglobin level before a trial of labor after cesarean section. The rate of vaginal birth after cesarean section increased significantly (p<0.001) from 72.9% with zero to 93.3% with one, 93.9% with two, and 94.1% with three or more trials of labor after cesarean section. CONCLUSION: Previously successful vaginal births after cesarean delivery are associated with improved maternal and neonatal outcomes in the subsequent trials of labor after cesarean delivery.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: There is a scarcity of studies on labour outcomes with defibulation. This study assessed the outcomes of labour with defibulation at delivery in women with type III female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) compared to labour without defibulation. METHODS: We identified and reviewed the records of all Somali and Sudanese women who delivered at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between January 2012 and December 2016. Labour outcomes of women with type III FGM/C who delivered vaginally with defibulation at delivery were compared to the outcomes of women without type III FGM/C who delivered vaginally without defibulation. Data extracted from the records included demographics, registration status, and labour outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, 1086 Somali and Sudanese women delivered at our institution, with 42% delivering by caesarean section. Among the 631 women with vaginal delivery, 27% had type III FGM/C and delivered with defibulation while 73% did not have type III FGM/C and delivered without defibulation. Demographic and clinical factors were similar between the two groups who delivered vaginally. The outcomes of labour with defibulation at delivery in women with type III FGM/C were not different from women without defibulation, except in regards to instrumental delivery and maternal blood loss. There were also no statistically significant differences between the two groups in neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Defibulation at delivery is an effective minor surgical procedure that should be in the armamentarium of the healthcare providers managing women with type III FGM/C. .
