Predicting regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women under 25 years.

BACKGROUND: A number of retrospective and prospective studies have documented substantial rates of regression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 lesions in young women. Initial observational management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 is increasingly accepted as appropriate for women under 25 years of age with screen-detected abnormalities and is included in a number of clinical guidelines. However, there has been a paucity of large prospective studies on observational management with strict inclusion criteria. A number of important questions remain, specifically regarding the clinical variables that are associated with the risk of progression or persistence of disease. To investigate these factors and to ensure that young women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 undergoing observational management were being managed in a well-monitored and an appropriately informed fashion, we conducted a large, multicenter prospective study on observational management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women under 25 years. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the regression rates and clinical, cytologic, and pathologic predictors of regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women under 25 years undergoing observational management over 24 months. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a multicenter prospective study on observational management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (ie, repeat colposcopy, cytology, and cervical biopsy every 6 months) for up to 24 months. A total of 615 consenting women under 25 years with newly-diagnosed, biopsy-proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 were recruited (from 2010 to 2016) through 16 hospital-based colposcopy units in New Zealand and Australia. RESULTS: At completion, 326 women had confirmed regression, 156 had persistent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 or adenocarcinoma in situ, and 24 had unconfirmed regression (ie, first regression at the 24-month follow-up). A total of 109 women did not complete the protocol (41 because of delayed follow-up, 41 lost to follow-up, 22 elected treatment, 4 refused a biopsy, and 1 died of an unrelated cause). Confirmed regression was observed in 53% (326 of 615) of all women enrolled in the study and, when missing data were imputed, it was estimated that 64% of women (95% confidence interval, 60%-68%) would have experienced regression. Similarly, lesions regressed in 64% (326 of 506) of women who completed the observational protocol. Based on a multivariable analysis, detection of human papillomavirus 16 in a liquid-based cytology sample at the time of initial colposcopy decreased the chance of regression by 31% (risk ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.86; P<.001). In addition, at initial colposcopy, low-grade or normal colposcopic impression, later year of diagnosis, low-grade or normal cytology, and being a nonsmoker were all independently associated with an increased chance of regression. CONCLUSION: More than half of women under 25 years with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 will regress to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or normal within 24 months without destructive treatment. The absence of human papillomavirus 16 is the most important predictor of regression.

Excisional treatment comparison for in situ endocervical adenocarcinoma (EXCISE): A phase 2 pilot randomized controlled trial to compare histopathological margin status, specimen size and fragmentation after loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife cone biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the cervix is a precursor to cervical adenocarcinoma. When AIS is detected by cervical screening an excision biopsy is mandatory to exclude invasion. We aimed to compare margins status, specimen size and fragmentation after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and 'cold knife cone biopsy' (CKC). METHODS: The EXCISE Trial was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, phase 2, randomized study. Patients were enrolled at seven hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. We randomly assigned women aged ≥18 to ≤45 years with screen detected AIS to LEEP or CKC. Co-primary endpoints were margin status, specimen size and fragmentation. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. RESULTS: Between August 2, 2017 and September 6, 2019, 40 patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to LEEP or CKC. Margin status was evaluable in 36 cases. The proportion of patients with involved margins did not differ between groups. 25 of 26 LEEP and all 14 CKC biopsies were excised as single specimens (p = 1·00). There were no differences in specimen dimensions. Patients in the CKC group had more post-operative complications (64.3% compared to 15.4% for LEEP p = ·00). There were no differences in grade three complications (p = ·65). CONCLUSIONS: LEEP was not associated with a greater likelihood of positive margins, specimen fragmentation or smaller excision compared to CKC when performed according to a standardized protocol. However, the study was not powered to establish non-inferiority of LEEP and a definitive phase 3 trial to compare margin status and rates of treatment failure after LEEP and CKC is warranted.

Trends in the diagnosis of high-grade cervical abnormalities in young women in the post-vaccination era.

BACKGROUND: Most cervical cancers are associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18. In 2008, New Zealand commenced a quadrivalent HPV (virus-like particles of types 6, 11, 16 and 18) vaccination programme. AIM: Document trends in number of colposcopy referrals and number and grade of cervical abnormalities diagnosed in women (20-24 years) referred to three large colposcopy clinics over time. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of colposcopy clinic data. RESULTS: The dataset included 5,012 episodes from 4,682 women. In Auckland (2013-2017), there was a 38% decrease in colposcopy referrals and 55% decrease in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) or worse diagnoses. In Waikato (2011-2017), there was an 8% decrease in referrals and 22% reduction in CIN2 or worse diagnoses. In Canterbury (2011-2017), there was a 24% decrease in referrals and 49% reduction in CIN2 or worse diagnoses. Across all centres, the decrease in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) or worse diagnoses was marked and more consistent than in CIN2 diagnoses. However, while the proportion of biopsies reported as CIN3 or worse decreased in non-Maori (24% in 2013 vs 16% in 2017, nptrend z=-4.24, p>|z| <.001), there was no change in Maori women (31% in 2013 vs 29% in 2017, nptrend z=-0.12, p>|z| =.90). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a decreased number of CIN diagnoses in young women over time, with a particularly large drop in the number of CIN3/AIS/CGIN diagnoses. However, compared to non-Maori, Maori women having biopsies are more likely to have CIN3 or worse and there was a smaller reduction in the total number of Maori women diagnosed with CIN2 or worse.

Evaluation of guidelines for observational management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in young women.

BACKGROUND: A high rate of regression in young women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 has been recorded. However, there are few prospective data by which to evaluate management guidelines. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology recommendations for follow-up of young women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 using data created by a large prospective multicenter study of observational management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were 616 women under 25 years with biopsy-diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 following a referral to colposcopy for an abnormal smear with no previous high-grade abnormality. The protocol included colposcopy, cytology, and colposcopically directed biopsy at the initial visit and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups visits, and these data were analyzed. Histology from the corresponding cervical biopsy was treated as the reference diagnostic test. For young women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2, we aimed to determine the following: (1) the ability of colposcopy to identify women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 or worse at 6 months; and (2) the ability of colposcopy, cytology, and a combination of cytology and colposcopy to identify residual high-grade abnormalities at 12 months. In addition, although not specified in the guidelines, we investigated the ability of high-risk human papillomavirus positivity alone or with cytology as a co-test to identify residual high-grade abnormalities at 12 months. RESULTS: At 6 months, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3+ colposcopic appearance identified only 28% (95% confidence interval, 18-40%) of women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3. At 12 months, a high-grade colposcopic appearance identified only 58% (95% confidence interval, 48-68%) of women with residual histological cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or 3. At 12 months, high-grade cytology identified only 58% (95% confidence interval, 48-68%) of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or 3. However, the combination of either high-grade cytology or colposcopic appearance proved substantially more sensitive (81%; 95% confidence interval, 72-88%). High-risk human papillomavirus positivity at 12 months was a sensitive (96%; 95% confidence interval, 89-99%) indicator of persisting high-grade histology. However, this sensitivity came at the expense of specificity (52%; 95% confidence interval, 45-58%). A co-test of high-risk human papillomavirus positivity or high-grade cytology at 12 months provided a high sensitivity (97%; 95% confidence interval, 90-99%) but low specificity (51%; 95% confidence interval, 45%-58%). CONCLUSION: Colposcopy and cytology are limited in their ability to exclude persistent high-grade abnormality for young women undergoing observational management for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2. We recommend biopsy for all women at 12 months. High-risk human papillomavirus positivity is a sensitive indicator of persistent abnormality and should be considered in those not having a biopsy.

Trends in the overall survival rates in women with advanced ovarian cancer in a single tertiary centre in New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: Survival rates for women diagnosed with ovarian cancer are much poorer than other gynaecological cancers and greatly depend on stage at diagnosis. A recent publication showed that unlike some other developed countries, there has been no improvement in the five-year survival rate for those diagnosed with ovarian cancer in New Zealand. AIM: To compare the five-year survival rate of women diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer in a single tertiary hospital during two 36-month time periods 10 years apart. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational retrospective review of patient clinical notes, including all women diagnosed with stage three or four ovarian cancer between 2000 and 2002 (Cohort 1) and 2010-2012 (Cohort 2). Eligible patients were identified through the Regional Gynaecology Oncology database. Clinical notes were reviewed to compare the five-year survival rate between these two time periods and look at changes in patterns of care over time. RESULTS: Eighty-three women were diagnosed in 2000-2002 and 125 women in 2010-2012. There was no difference in five-year survival between cohorts (21.7% vs 23.2%, P = 0.80). Mean age at diagnosis did not differ between cohorts (62.1 years vs 63.5 years, P = 0.43); however, there were more women with stage four cancer in Cohort 2 (14% vs 30%, P = 0.01). In Cohort 2, more women were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (20% vs 34%, P = 0.04) or chemotherapy only (6% vs 18%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Five-year overall survival in women diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer in our centre has not changed over the last 10 years.

Pathological process has a crucial role in sentinel node biopsy for vulvar cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To report the interim findings of an audit of the outcomes of sentinel node (SN) biopsy performed as a replacement for groin node dissection in women with early stage vulvar cancer in routine clinical practice in Australia and New Zealand. METHODS: A prospective multi-center study in 8 participating centers. Eligible patients had squamous cell carcinomas clinically restricted to the vulva <4 cm in diameter. SN procedures and pathological assessment were to be performed in accordance with the methods published by the GROINSS-V collaboration [1]. RESULTS: 130 women with apparent early stage vulvar cancer were enrolled. Seventeen women subsequently did not meet the eligibility criteria and were excluded. SNs were identified in 111/113 of the remaining women. Twenty-two women had positive nodes. Sixteen of these women had at least 12 months follow up and 7 (44%) had recurrent disease. Eighty-nine women had only negative nodes. Seventy-four of these women had at least 12 months follow up and 6 (8%) had recurrent disease (including 2 [2.7%] with recurrence in the groin). On subsequent review of the two women with negative SNs who had groin recurrences, it was found that the recommended pathology protocol had not been followed. In both cases, SN metastases were identified following serial sectioning of the nodes. CONCLUSIONS: SN biopsy is feasible in routine clinical practice. However, undetected metastases in a removed SN may be associated with groin recurrence. To ensure patient safety, strict adherence to the pathology protocol is an essential component in the utilization of the sentinel lymph node technique in vulvar cancer.

Changes in human papillomavirus genotypes associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 lesions in a cohort of young women (2013-2016).

In 2008, a quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine (genotypes 6, 11, 16, 18) became available in New Zealand. This study investigated whether the proportion of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) lesions associated with HPV genotypes 16 and 18 changed over time in young women recruited to a prospective CIN2 observational management trial (PRINCess) between 2013 and 2016. Partial HPV genotyping (16, 18, or other high risk HPV) was undertaken on n = 392 women under 25 years (mean age 21.8, range 17-24) with biopsy-diagnosed CIN2. High risk HPV genotypes were detected in 96% of women with CIN2 lesions. Between 2013 and 2016, the proportion of women whose liquid-based cytology samples were HPV 16 or 18 positive decreased from 43% to 13%. HPV vaccination status was known for 78% of women. Between 2013 and 2016, the proportion of HPV 16/18 positivity did not significantly change in HPV-vaccinated women, but decreased from 66% to 17% in unvaccinated women. The reducing proportion of HPV 16/18-related CIN2 in our cohort of young New Zealand women may be attributable to the introduction of a national HPV vaccination program. The substantial decrease in HPV 16/18 positivity observed in unvaccinated women is likely to be due to a herd effect.

Observational Management of CIN 2 in Young Women: A Prospective Multicenter Trial.

OBJECTIVES: We present the rationale and methods for PRINCess-a multicenter prospective trial-which aims to determine outcome and predictors of regression in a large cohort of women younger than 25 years with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN 2) undergoing observational management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred women younger than 25 years with newly diagnosed biopsy-proven CIN 2 are being recruited to observational management (i.e., repeat colposcopy, cytology, and cervical biopsy every 6 months for 2 years). Five hundred fifty-two women from throughout New Zealand and 1 site in Australia have been recruited so far. Measures include histology, cytology, human papillomavirus genotyping, and immunohistochemical staining. Women who develop CIN 3 will be treated with large loop excision of the transformation zone. The primary outcomes are rates of clinical regression of CIN 2 (i.e., 2 consecutive colposcopy follow-ups showing CIN 1 or normal), loss to follow-up, and progression to invasion. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal treatment for young women with a diagnosis of CIN 2 is controversial. Although many undergo surgical treatment, observational management is increasingly recommended. However, there is little evidence from large clinical trials of the safety and practicality of observational management of young women with CIN 2. When completed, we will have adequate evidence by which to counsel women regarding their likely outcomes and to offer advice on clinical follow-up protocols.

Human papilloma virus is detectable by the Hybrid Capture 2 test in cervical smear samples from women over 40 years of age with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

To establish that in Canterbury, New Zealand, women over the age of 40 with biopsy confirmed high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) have human papilloma virus (HPV) detectable by the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) test. Fifty-two women with abnormal cytology under going colposcopy had HC2 performed. HPV status, cytology and histology were compared. HC2 was positive in 30/31 with grade 2 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2) or worse, 5/6 with HPV changes or CIN1, and 10/15 with no demonstrated abnormality.

Findings and outcome of teenage women referred for colposcopy at Christchurch Women's Hospital, New Zealand.

AIM: To determine the colposcopic findings, treatment, and follow up of 15-19 year old women referred to a large public colposcopy clinic. METHOD: A retrospective review of the colposcopy database and clinical records between 1995 and 2001. RESULTS: 243 women or 4.7% of new referrals were aged 15-19 years. Referral smears were high-grade squamous lesions (HGSL) in 15%, and low-grade squamous lesions (LGSL) or atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance (ASCUS) in 82%. Following colposcopy, 21% had biopsy proven high-grade abnormalities but only 4% had grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN3). Of those with LGSL or ASCUS smears, 2% had biopsy-proven CIN3; and of those with HGSL smears, 14% had biopsy proven CIN3. Women underwent a mean of 4.1 colposcopy sessions; 67% underwent treatment and 26% were discharged without treatment. Sixteen percent of the women were lost to follow-up. Treatment failure occurred in 8% of those treated. For women undergoing observation, 25% were discharged after the first follow-up and less than 3% progressed to CIN3. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of CIN3 in women under the age of 20 referred to colposcopy at Christchurch Women's Hospital is low. Screening teenage women results in invasive investigation and treatment without proven benefit and is not recommended. A conservative approach to the management of young women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial abnormalities is also advocated.