ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Both yellow-blue (YB) discrimination thresholds and macular pigment optical density (MPOD) measurements in the eye exhibit large variability in the normal population. Although it is well established that selective absorption of blue light by the macular pigment (MP) can significantly affect trichromatic colour matches, the extent to which the MP affects colour discrimination (CD) sensitivity remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we assess whether the variability in YB thresholds is attributable to differences in MPOD, both at the fovea and in the paracentral visual field. We also investigated whether higher levels of MP offer any advantage in other visual functions such as red-green (RG) CD sensitivity. DESIGN: CD thresholds and spatial MPOD profiles were measured in 24 normal trichromats supplemented with zeaxanthin (OPTISHARP) and/or lutein. Novel stimulus conditions that isolate YB and RG chromatic mechanisms were employed and MPOD profiles were measured up to an eccentricity of 8 degrees. RESULTS: The data reveal an increase in MPOD in the supplemented subjects that was almost uniform within a centre region around the fovea subtending +/-4 degrees. RG sensitivity was high in all subjects with thresholds well within the normal range. Unexpectedly, YB thresholds were also normal and showed no correlation with MPOD. A model for threshold CD based on appropriate combinations of cone contrast signals was developed to explain the experimental findings. CONCLUSIONS: YB thresholds remain unaffected by supplementation with lutein and/or zeaxanthin rather, at increased MPOD levels, RG vision tends to be improved. The model accounts for the absence of correlation between MPOD and YB thresholds and predicts a marginal improvement in RG discrimination when MPOD is high.
Subject(s)
Color Perception/drug effects , Lutein/pharmacology , Retinal Pigments/metabolism , Xanthophylls/pharmacology , Adult , Color Perception/physiology , Color Perception Tests/methods , Fovea Centralis/physiology , Humans , Lutein/blood , Macula Lutea/drug effects , Macula Lutea/metabolism , Male , Sensory Thresholds/drug effects , Xanthophylls/blood , ZeaxanthinsABSTRACT
Little is known about how color signals and cone- and rod-based luminance signals contribute to perceived contrast in the mesopic range. In this study the perceived contrast of colored, mesopic stimuli was matched with that of spatially equivalent achromatic stimuli. The objective was to develop a metric for perceived contrast in the mesopic range in terms of an equivalent achromatic luminance contrast, referred to here as effective contrast. Stimulus photopic luminance contrast, scotopic luminance contrast, and chromatic difference from the background all contributed to effective contrast over the mid-mesopic range, but their contributions were not independent and varied markedly with background luminance. Surprisingly, color made a significant contribution to effective contrast from 10 to approximately 0.003 cd m(-2). A model describing this relationship is introduced (R2 = 0.89) and compared with predictions of mesopic luminance contrast obtained from a number of models proposed as systems of mesopic photometry.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Color Perception/physiology , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Information Storage and Retrieval/methods , Models, Biological , Pattern Recognition, Automated/methods , Adult , Artificial Intelligence , Cluster Analysis , Colorimetry/methods , Colorimetry/standards , Computer Simulation , Female , Humans , Image Enhancement/methods , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/standards , Male , Models, Statistical , Pattern Recognition, Automated/standards , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Task Performance and AnalysisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: All forms of corneal refractive surgery can sometimes cause an increase in optical aberrations and scattered light, which can affect visual performance. The purpose of this study was to develop a suitable test that was sensitive to retinal image degradation in subjects who have undergone excimer laser refractive surgery and that was also relevant to visual demands in commercial aviation. METHODS: Assessment of the visual environment and the tasks involved in piloting a commercial aircraft formed the basis for the selection of the test parameters. The new contrast acuity assessment (CAA) test covers a functional visual field of +/-5 degrees and is based on minimum spatial vision requirements for commercial pilots. RESULTS: Data measured in 100 normal subjects were used to define the 'standard normal observer' and the range of variation for the parameters of the test. This approach makes it possible to quickly establish whether a given subject's performance falls within the range of the standard normal observer. The test is also administered under low ambient illumination since flying at night involves mesopic levels of light adaptation when the pupil size is large and the effects of aberrations and scattered light are therefore more pronounced. CONCLUSION: The results of the test are simple to interpret and reveal visual performance that falls outside the normal range as a result of either significant degradation of retinal image quality (caused by increased aberrations and scattered light) or abnormal processing of visual information in the retina and/or the visual pathway.
