Reliability and role of plain film radiography and CT in the diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: We compare the reliability and define the role of plain film radiography and CT in the assessment of various severities of small-bowel obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A blinded retrospective analysis was done on 78 patients who underwent plain abdominal radiography, CT, and enteroclysis to assess for suspected small-bowel obstruction. The findings at enteroclysis and the clinical outcomes were used as standards of reference. RESULTS: The sensitivity of plain film radiography for revealing small-bowel obstruction was 69% (44/64), and its specificity was 57% (8/14). Overall accuracy of plain film radiography was 67% (52/78). The sensitivity and specificity of CT were 64% (41/64) and 79% (11/ 14), respectively. Overall accuracy of CT was 67% (52/78). When obstructions were classified as low- and high-grade partial obstruction, plain film radiography and CT had sensitivities of 86% (24/28) and 82% (23/28), respectively, for high-grade obstruction and 56% (20/36) and 50% (18/36), respectively, for low-grade obstruction. CT revealed the cause of the small-bowel obstruction in 95% (39/41) of those patients in who CT correctly showed the obstruction. CONCLUSION: Plain film radiography and CT had similar overall accuracies in showing small-bowel obstruction of various severities. Plain film radiography should remain the initial method of imaging patients with suspected small-bowel obstruction. The ability of CT to show the cause of small-bowel obstruction makes CT an important additional diagnostic tool when specific management issues must be addressed.

Obstruction of the small intestine: accuracy and role of CT in diagnosis.

The reliability of abdominal computed tomography (CT) in the assessment of varying degrees of small bowel obstruction (SBO) was evaluated by using results at enteroclysis and clinical outcome as standards of reference. A blinded retrospective analysis was performed of the studies of 55 patients who underwent both CT and enteroclysis in the course of assessment for suspected SBO. Nine patients had no obstruction, 40 patients had obstruction due to adhesions, and six patients had tumor-related obstruction. CT results were used to identify correctly 63% (29 of 46) of those who had SBO and 78% (seven of nine) of the patients who did not. The overall accuracy of the CT interpretations to help establish diagnosis was 65% (36 of 55). When obstructions were classified into low- and high-grade partial obstruction, CT results could be used to identify correctly 81% (17 of 21) of high-grade SBOs and 48% (12 of 25) of low-grade SBOs. The procedure yielded two false-positive and 13 false-negative results for patients with low-grade obstruction, revealed masses in all six cases with tumor-related obstruction, and helped predict the correct cause in all true-positive cases.

Effect of varying rates of low-osmolarity contrast media injection for hepatic CT: correlation with indocyanine green transit time.

Contrast enhancement in hepatic computed tomography (CT) is related to multiple factors, including the amount of iodine injected, the rate of injection, and body weight. Fifty patients were randomized into two groups: 19 patients (group 1) received a 160-mL dose of Optiray 320 (ioversol) at 3.0 mL/sec, and 31 (group 2) received the same dose at 4.5 mL/sec. Indocyanine green dye transit time, peak enhancement, delayed enhancement, time to peak enhancement, age, and weight were statistically analyzed. Time to peak enhancement was significantly shorter in group 2 than in group 1 (62 seconds vs 73 seconds, respectively; P less than .01). Peak contrast enhancement averaged 88 HU +/- 19 in group 1 and 99 HU +/- 17 in group 2 (P = .06). Circulation time did not correlate with peak enhancement and thus does not assist in tailoring contrast medium injection for hepatic CT. Injection of contrast material at 3.0 and 4.5 mL/sec provides greater hepatic CT contrast enhancement than previously reported, with no significant risk of subcutaneous extravasation when injection is monitored carefully. These higher levels of contrast enhancement may assist in detecting and characterizing hepatic lesions.

Perioperative asymptomatic venous thrombosis: role of duplex scanning versus venography.

We compared combined B-mode/Doppler (duplex ultrasonic scanning and venography in routine preoperative and postoperative screening for major proximal deep vein thrombosis in 78 patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty. Of 309 extremity examinations, duplex scanning had an overall sensitivity of 85.7% (12/14) and a specificity of 97.3% (287/295). The preoperative prevalence and postoperative incidence of major deep vein thrombosis were 2.5% and 14.1% of patients, respectively, despite intensive mechanical and pharmacologic prophylaxis. In addition, venography documented a preoperative prevalence and postoperative incidence of isolated calf deep vein thrombosis in 2.5% and 16.7% of patients, respectively. Whereas such disease extended proximally even in the absence of anticoagulation in only 18% of patients studied by serial duplex scans, calf deep vein thrombosis accounted for the only two instances of pulmonary embolism in this study. There were no deaths related to pulmonary embolism. This study suggests that duplex scanning is useful in screening for perioperative deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty, which carries a significant risk of venous thromboembolism despite routine prophylaxis.