Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 2(5): 508-13, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20031884

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend a door-to-balloon time (DTB) <90 minutes for nontransferred patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Systems of care to achieve and sustain this DTB performance over several years have not been previously reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Mayo Clinic STEMI protocol was implemented in April 2004 and included activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory by the emergency medicine physician; a single call system to activate the catheterization laboratory; catheterization laboratory staff arrival within 20 to 30 minutes of activation; and real-time performance feedback within 24 to 48 hours. Data were collected on nontransferred STEMI patients. The preimplementation group (June 2002 to March 2004) comprised 96 patients with a median DTB of 97 (interquartile range, 82, 130) minutes, and 40% had a DTB <90 minutes. The postimplementation group (May 2004 to March 2008) comprised 322 patients with a median DTB of 67 (interquartile range, 55, 82) minutes, and 81% had a DTB <90 minutes. Postimplementation DTB was significantly shorter than preimplementation DTB (P<0.001). In the 4-year follow-up after protocol implementation, the DTB performance remained stable over time (P=0.41). CONCLUSIONS: The Mayo Clinic STEMI protocol implemented strategies to reduce DTB for nontransferred patients with STEMI. DTB was significantly reduced, and the results were sustained over the 4-year follow-up period. Our experience demonstrates the effectiveness and durability of process changes targeting timeliness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Emergency Medical Services/standards , Emergency Service, Hospital/standards , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Aged , Electrocardiography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Program Evaluation , Quality of Health Care , Time Factors , Transportation of Patients/standards
2.
Am Heart J ; 157(4): 636-41, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19332189

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponins are the markers of choice for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of "aborted myocardial infarction" (no detectable myocardial injury) determined by measurement of troponin versus that determined by creatine kinase (CK) and creatine kinase-muscle brain (CK-MB) measurement criteria among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who received reperfusion therapy. METHODS: Since 2004, the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) has had a standard reperfusion protocol for the treatment of patients with STEMI. During the study period, 767 patients presented with new or presumed new ST elevation or left bundle block. RESULTS: The diagnosis of STEMI was confirmed in 765 (99.7%) patients. Using the 99th percentile cutoff value, troponin T elevations occurred in 765 (100%) of 765 patients when serial samples were available. Creatine kinase-MB levels of twice or more the upper limit of normal occurred in 681 (90.1%) of 749 patients with serial samples for CK-MB, and CK equal or greater than twice the gender-specific upper limits of normal occurred in 521 (78.8%) of 661 patients with serial samples for CK available. CONCLUSION: The frequency of aborted myocardial infarction is 0% when using troponin at the 99th percentile cutoff as recommended by contemporary guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology (Nice, France) and American College of Cardiology (Washington, DC).


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Troponin/blood , Biomarkers/blood , Diagnosis, Differential , Diagnostic Errors , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/blood
3.
Ann Emerg Med ; 52(4): 322-8, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18339449

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: An emergency department (ED) observation unit protocol for the management of acute onset atrial fibrillation is compared with routine hospital admission and management. METHODS: Adult patients presenting to the ED with atrial fibrillation of less than 48 hours' duration without hemodynamic instability or other comorbid conditions requiring hospitalization were enrolled. Participants were randomized to either ED observation unit care or routine inpatient care. The ED observation unit protocol included pulse rate control, cardiac monitoring, reassessment, and electrical cardioversion if atrial fibrillation persisted. Patients who reverted to sinus rhythm were discharged with a cardiology follow-up within 3 days, whereas those still in atrial fibrillation were admitted. All cases were followed up for 6 months and adverse events recorded. RESULTS: Of the 153 patients, 75 were randomized to the ED observation unit and 78 to routine inhospital care. Eighty-five percent of ED observation unit patients converted to sinus rhythm versus 73% in the routine care group (difference 12%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1% to 25%]; P=.06). The median length of stay was 10.1 versus 25.2 hours (difference 15.1 hours; 95% CI 11.2 to 19.6; P<.001) for ED observation unit and inhospital care respectively. Nine ED observation unit patients required inpatient admission. Eleven percent of the ED observation unit group had recurrence of atrial fibrillation during follow-up versus 10% of the routine inpatient care group (difference 1%; 95% CI -9% to 11%; P=.93). There was no significant difference between the groups in the frequency of hospitalization or the number of tests, and the number of adverse events during follow-up was similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: An ED observation unit protocol that includes electrical cardioversion is a feasible alternative to routine hospital admission for acute onset of atrial fibrillation and results in a shorter initial length of stay.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Algorithms , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Blood Pressure , Electric Countershock , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 1(1): 88-96, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19393151

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We implemented the Mayo Clinic ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) protocol and evaluated the timeliness of reperfusion therapy during off hours versus regular hours. BACKGROUND: Patients with STEMI who present during off hours have longer door-to-balloon times and door-to-needle times. METHODS: The Mayo STEMI protocol was implemented in May 2004 to optimize timeliness of reperfusion therapy for STEMI patients presenting to Saint Mary's Hospital, a tertiary facility with on-site percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and for those presenting to 28 regional hospitals located up to 150 miles away from Saint Mary's Hospital. We compared door-to-balloon times and door-to-needle times for 597 consecutive patients who presented during off hours (weekdays from 5 pm to 7 am and any time on weekends or holidays) versus regular hours (weekdays from 7 am to 5 pm). In 2003, prior to implementing the protocol, median door-to-balloon time at Saint Mary's Hospital was 85 min during regular hours and 98 min during off hours. RESULTS: Among 258 patients who presented to Saint Mary's Hospital, median door-to-balloon time was 65 min during regular hours versus 74 min during off hours (p = 0.085). Among 105 patients transferred from regional hospitals for primary PCI, median door-to-balloon time was 118 min during regular hours versus 114 min during off hours (p = 0.15). Among 131 patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy at regional hospitals, median door-to-needle time was 21 min during regular hours versus 26 min during off hours (p = 0.067). CONCLUSIONS: The Mayo Clinic STEMI protocol demonstrates the rapid times that can be achieved through coordinated systems of care for STEMI patients presenting during off hours and regular hours.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods , Electrocardiography , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Inpatients , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Myocardial Reperfusion/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
Circulation ; 116(7): 729-36, 2007 Aug 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17673456

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement efforts have focused on strategies to improve the timeliness of reperfusion therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients who present to hospitals with and without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) capability. We implemented and evaluated a protocol to optimize the timeliness of reperfusion therapy and to coordinate systems of care for a PCI center and 28 regional hospitals located up to 150 miles away across 3 states. METHODS AND RESULTS: The present study focused on a prospective, observational cohort of 597 patients who presented with ST-segment elevation and within 12 hours of symptom onset to Saint Marys Hospital and 28 regional hospitals up to 150 miles away between May 2004 and December 2006. The Mayo Clinic ST-elevation myocardial infarction protocol implemented strategies to improve timeliness of reperfusion therapy and to coordinate systems of care for transfer between hospitals. The study sample consisted of 258 patients who presented to Saint Marys Hospital and were treated with primary PCI (group A), 105 patients who presented to a regional hospital with symptom onset >3 hours and then were transferred for primary PCI (group B), and 131 patients who presented to a regional hospital with symptom onset <3 hours and were treated with full-dose fibrinolytic therapy (group C). For groups A and B, median door-to-balloon times were 71 and 116 minutes, respectively. Door-to-balloon time <90 minutes was achieved in 75% of group A and 12% of group B. Median door-to-needle time was 25 minutes for group C, and 70% had door-to-needle time <30 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The Mayo Clinic ST-elevation myocardial infarction protocol demonstrates the feasibility of implementing strategies to optimize the timeliness of reperfusion therapy and the times that can be achieved through coordinated systems of care for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting to a PCI center (Saint Marys Hospital) and 28 regional hospitals without PCI capability located up to 150 miles away across 3 states.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/standards , Clinical Protocols , Community Health Planning , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Regional Medical Programs/organization & administration , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/mortality , Electrocardiography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Iowa , Male , Middle Aged , Minnesota , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Time Factors , Wisconsin
6.
Med Clin North Am ; 90(3): 417-38, vii, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16473098

ABSTRACT

The incidence of patients who present to the office with arrhythmia and hemodynamic instability is unknown. Emergency medical systems data, based on ambulance runs, are available only for patients who have had a cardiac arrest. When faced with an unstable or potentially unstable patient, however, we must be prepared to act quickly, safely, and accurately. This article addresses the general approach to such a patient; provides necessary information on office emergency preparation, including training, rapid response team protocol, and the use of automated external defibrillators; and addresses the identification and initial office management of the various rhythms that are capable of threatening a patient's life.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Ambulatory Care , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Flutter/diagnosis , Bradycardia/diagnosis , Bradycardia/etiology , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Defibrillators , Emergencies , Emergency Treatment , Humans , Office Visits , Tachycardia/therapy , Tachycardia, Paroxysmal/diagnosis , Tachycardia, Paroxysmal/therapy
7.
Cardiol Clin ; 24(1): 1-17, v, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16326253

ABSTRACT

The last decade has seen extraordinary advances in the cardiovascular arena, particularly in the evaluation and management of the patient who has acute coronary syndromes. From bedside markers of myocardial damage to drug-eluting stents, technical advances are proliferating. Efforts in developing an international registry for acute aortic dissection have helped elucidate the acute presentation, management, and prognosis of this uncommon but lethal disease. Finally, the multiple research efforts in coordinating clinical decision-making with serologic markers and advanced imaging for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism is changing the approach to the patient at risk for thromboembolic disease.


Subject(s)
Chest Pain/diagnosis , Chest Pain/therapy , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Intensive Care Units , Thrombolytic Therapy/methods , Adult , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods , Chest Pain/mortality , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Early Diagnosis , Echocardiography, Doppler , Electrocardiography , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Rate , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Triage
8.
Emerg Med Clin North Am ; 23(4): 1159-77, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16199343

ABSTRACT

Emergency physicians (EPs) are commonly faced with life-threatening entities. Particularly challenging are the aortic catastrophes, such as penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs), intramural hematomas (IMHs), and atypical presentations of acute aortic dissections and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Several factors account for this: (1) the rapidly evolving knowledge (particularly in the pathogenesis and precursors of aortic dissection [AD]), (2) the lack of comfort caused by infrequent exposure, (3) the misconceptions about the work up and treatment, (4) the lack of emergent vascular surgery back up in the community, and finally (5) the high short-term mortality and missed rates. Finally, the media has publicized cases of celebrities and other patients who experienced fatal outcomes when their aortic catastrophes went undiagnosed. Practitioners of emergency care should, therefore, understand the challenges, be aware of the recent advances, and help limit the controversies in the evaluation and management of these patients.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Aortic Rupture , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnosis , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/etiology , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Rupture/diagnosis , Aortic Rupture/etiology , Aortic Rupture/surgery , Diagnosis, Differential , Diagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...