Predictor factors of 1-rooted mandibular second molars on complicated root and canal anatomies of other mandibular teeth.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the effects of 1-rooted mandibular second molar (MnSM) teeth on root canal anatomy complexities of the mandibular central incisor (MnCI), mandibular lateral incisor (MnLI), mandibular canine (MnCn), mandibular first premolar (MnFP), mandibular second premolar (MnSP), and mandibular first molar (MnFM) teeth. Materials and Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography images of 600 patients with full lower dentition were examined. Individuals with 1-rooted MnSMs were determined, and the complexity of root canal anatomy of other teeth was compared with individuals without 1-rooted MnSMs (Group-1; subjects with at least one 1-rooted MnSM, Group-2; subjects with more than a single root in both MnSMs). A second canal in MnCIs, MnLIs, MnCns, MnFPs, and MnSPs indicated a complicated root canal. The presence of a third root in MnFMs was recorded as complicated. Results: The prevalence of 1-rooted MnSMs was 12.2%, with the C-shaped root type being the most prevalent (9%). There were fewer complicated root canals in MnCIs (p = 0.02), MnLIs (p < 0.001), and MnFPs (p < 0.001) in Group 1. The other teeth showed no difference between the groups (p > 0.05). According to logistic regression analysis, 1-rooted right MnSMs had a negative effect on having complex canal systems of MnLIs and MnFPs. Left MnSMs were explanatory variables on left MnLIs and both MnFPs. Conclusions: In individuals with single-rooted MnSMs, a less complicated root canal system was observed in all teeth except the MnFMs.

In Vitro Comparison of the Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scanning and Electronic Apex Locators in Detection of Simulated Root Perforations in Different Localizations.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) scanning and 2 different electronic apex locators (EALs) in the detection of simulated root canal perforations in different localizations. METHODS: Eighty human mandibular premolars were prepared and divided into 2 groups according to the localization of the perforation area, having a 1-mm diameter. The distance between the occlusal edge and the beginning of the perforation was measured under a stereomicroscope (actual working length) using 2 EALs (Propex II [Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland] and Dentaport ZX [J. Morita, Tokyo, Japan]) (electronic working length) and CBCT images (CBCT working length). The calculations were made by subtracting the actual working length from the electronic working length and the CBCT working length to determine the differences. RESULTS: In the apical third perforation group, there was a significant difference between Dentaport ZX and CBCT imaging. There was no significant difference between Dentaport ZX and Propex II and Propex II and CBCT measurements. In the middle third perforation group, Propex II was significantly more successful than CBCT imaging. In addition, there was no significance between the accuracy of Propex II in detecting the perforation area between the apical third perforation group and the middle third perforation group. CBCT imaging was more accurate in detecting the perforation area in the apical third perforation group than in the middle third perforation group. CONCLUSIONS: In cases in which the root canal perforation was in the apical third of the root, both the EAL and CBCT imaging were successful in determining the perforation area, whereas the success rate of all devices used in this study decreased when the perforation area was in the middle third of the root.

Efficacy of Laser-Activated Irrigants in Calcium Hydroxide Removal from the Artificial Grooves in Root Canals: An Ex Vivo Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an erbium chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser with different irrigation solutions [sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), QMix 2in1, and peracetic acid] in removing calcium hydroxide (CH) from artificial grooves created in root canals. BACKGROUND DATA: CH has to be removed totally before the root canal filling. Any CH residue on the dentin walls may affect the dentinal bond strength and the penetration of sealers into the dentin tubules, and may increase apical leakage. In addition, such a remnant could react chemically with sealers and, possibly, influence physical properties. Therefore, complete removal of CH placed inside the root canals is recommended, using various products and techniques. METHODS: The root canals of 160 extracted single-rooted mandibular premolars were prepared with ProTaper Universal rotary instruments up to size F4. The roots were split longitudinally along the length of the instrumented canals, and a standardized groove was prepared in the apical part of one segment. CH powder mixed with distilled water was placed into the grooves, and the root halves were then reassembled. The roots were randomly divided into two main groups according to the selected irrigation techniques (needle and laser activation) and then each main group was divided into four subgroups according to the final irrigation (NaOCl, EDTA, QMix 2in1, and peracetic acid) protocols used. After irrigation, the roots were disassembled and digital images were taken using a stereomicroscope. Measurements of residual CH were performed as percentages of the overall groove surface area with image analysis software. The data obtained were analyzed using one way analysis of variance and Tukey's honest significant difference tests. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Significantly less residual CH was obtained in the laser-activated groups than in the needle-irrigated groups (p < 0.05). According to both main groups' data, NaOCl left significantly more CH than the other groups (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference among the EDTA, QMix 2in1, and peracetic acid groups. CONCLUSIONS: None of the techniques removed the CH dressing completely. Laser-activated irrigation was significantly more effective than needle irrigation.