Percutaneous Image Guided Cryoablation of Adrenal Metastases From Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Single Institution Review.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety, technical success, disease progression, and survival associated with percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma metastasis (mRCC) in the adrenal gland. METHODS: Retrospective, single-institution review of adult patients undergoing percutaneous cryoablation for adrenal mRCC between the years of 2007-2021. Technical parameters, technical success, safety, and survival were analyzed according to standard criteria. RESULTS: Forty-six patients (39 male; mean age 66 ± 8.8 years) with 57 tumors ablated over 51 sessions with a median hospital length of stay of 1 day (range 0-3 days). Forty-four (96%) had primary of clear cell histology. Aim of ablation was curative intent in 39 of 57 tumors (72%) with local tumor control in the remainder. There were 2 (4%) technical failures and technique efficacy was achieved in 52 out of the remaining 55 (95%). There were no Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events' immediate complications and 4 of 51 (8%) delayed complications. Twenty-five of 57 (44%) had disease progression anywhere, away from ablation site. One-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence free survival rates were 100%, 89%, and 89% and overall survival was 98%, 85%, and 71%. Fifty-one of 57 (89%) underwent preprocedural alpha blockade with hypertensive crisis in 27 of 56 (54%) available records, of which there were no adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous cryoablation of mRCC to the adrenal glands is safe with robust local control, leading to advocacy for its ongoing use in this patient population. Multi-disciplinary management is recommended for successful treatment.

The impact of measuring split kidney function on post-donation kidney function: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported agreement between computed tomography (CT) and renography for the determination of split kidney function. However, their correlation with post-donation kidney function remains unclear. We compared CT measurements with renography in assessment of split kidney function (SKF) and their correlations with post-donation kidney function. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective cohort study of 248 donors from January 1, 2009-July 31, 2019 were assessed. Pearson correlations were used to assess post-donation kidney function with renography and CT-based measurements. Furthermore, we examined high risk groups with SKF difference greater than 10% on renography and donors with post-donation eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73m2. RESULTS: 62% of donors were women with a mean (standard deviation) pre-donation eGFR 99 (20) and post-donation eGFR 67 (22) mL/min/1.73m2 at 31 months of follow-up. Post-donation kidney function was poorly correlated with both CT-based measurements and renography, including the subgroup of donors with post-donation eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73m2 (r less than 0.4 for all). There was agreement between CT-based measurements and renography for SKF determination (Bland-Altman agreement [bias, 95% limits of agreement] for renography vs: CT volume, 0.76%, -7.60-9.15%; modified ellipsoid,1.01%, -8.38-10.42%; CC dimension, 0.44%, -7.06-7.94); however, CT missed SKF greater than 10% found by renography in 20 out 26 (77%) of donors. CONCLUSIONS: In a single centre study of 248 living donors, we found no correlation between CT or renography and post-donation eGFR. Further research is needed to determine optimal ways to predict remaining kidney function after donation.