Older women's view on frailty and an Emergency Department evidence-based Frailty Intervention Team (FIT) program: An evaluation using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance RE-AIM framework.

BACKGROUND: Older women have higher levels of frailty resulting in disability and reduced quality of life. Presentation to an Emergency Department (ED) is an opportunity to address frailty and provide tailored interventions to promote function. An ED allied health team integrated frailty assessment and interventions into care through a 'Frailty Intervention Team' (FIT) program. METHODS: A prospective study informed by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to evaluate the FIT program tailored to female older adults. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the FIT program over a three-month period and use the findings to further develop the intervention. RESULTS: Over three-months, 192 older females (>70 years) were identified with mild frailty and discharged directly home. Ninety percent were offered the FIT program with 83.3 % accepting all recommended frailty management strategies. Ninety percent of patients were satisfied with the FIT program, however staff and patient barriers to provision of frailty services were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The FIT program was largely adopted by staff and accepted by older female patients with mild frailty in the ED. However, program effectiveness was limited by gaps in communication about frailty in the ED and implementation of frailty management strategies after discharge.

Improving care for older patients visiting emergency departments. Are they receiving falls prevention guideline care?

BACKGROUND: The primary objective was to examine whether the Emergency Department (ED) treatment of older adults who fall in Australia is concordant with falls prevention and management clinical guideline care recommendations. METHODS: A retrospective medical records audit was completed for patients 65years and older, who attended the ED with a fall and were discharged home. An audit tool was developed from local, national, and international falls clinical guidelines. RESULTS: One thousand and twenty-seven patients presented following a fall throughout 2020. One hundred and seven patient medical records were audited. Assessment of cognition (94%), medication review (76%) and use of a falls risk screen (76%) were commonly completed. Under half of the patients had a documented gait evaluation (40%) and review of vision (18%). Concordance with guideline care was more likely for older patients (p = 0.042), with higher levels of comorbidity (p = 0.013), who required care assistance (p = 0.008) and received treatment from a multidisciplinary team (p < 0.001) in an observation ward (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with increased comorbidities and higher care needs had more falls guideline care recommendations documented. This was likely to occur when patients were moved to the observation ward where more comprehensive care by a multidisciplinary team could occur.

Barriers and facilitating factors influencing implementation of occupational therapy home assessment recommendations: A mixed methods systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Low implementation rates of occupational therapy home assessment recommendations have previously been reported. The objective was to identify and describe the barriers and facilitating factors that influence implementation of home assessment recommendations. METHODS: A mixed methods systematic review consisting of studies involving adults living in the community who received an occupational therapy home assessment was conducted. Seven databases were last searched in August 2021. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools (SUMARI) dependent on study design. Data synthesis followed the convergent integrated approach. Findings were mapped to the theoretical Capability Opportunity Motivation Behaviour (COM-B) model of health behaviour change. RESULTS: From 5,540 citations, 22 articles met the criteria for the systematic review. Implementation of occupational therapy home assessment recommendations ranged between 55% and 90%. Six synthesised findings were identified. Capability barriers included a patient's cognitive and physical ability. Motivation barriers included a perceived lack of need and stigma; patient reported decreased involvement and lack of choice. Opportunity barriers included limited family or carer involvement, carer stress, level of service provision available, including funding, therapy dosage and timing and environmental restrictions. Overall facilitators included patient-centred care, including choice and understanding need, individualised tailored recommendations, involvement of families and carers, provision of written record and strategies to support implementation. Results were limited by methodological weaknesses in identified studies and heterogeneity in the definition and measurement of implementation impacting on comparison. Specific intervention components were often poorly described. CONCLUSION: The theoretical model elucidates priority factors to address for promoting implementation of home assessment recommendations. Future high-quality research clearly defining intervention components is required to support short- and long-term implementation of recommendations in the home environment. Behaviour change techniques could be utilised to support home assessment practices in future research.

Does the Integration of Telehealth into Occupational Therapy Practice Impact Clinical Outcomes for Hand and Upper Limb Rehabilitation? A Matched Case Control Study.

Health services are capitalizing on the rise of telehealth and seeking to develop sustainable models incorporating telehealth into standard care. Further research is required to explore the service and clinical outcomes of telehealth in occupational therapy hand and upper limb practice. This research utilized a case-control study to explore the feasibility and clinical outcomes of case matched patients who received a telehealth hybrid model versus traditional in-person care. One hundred and two patients were recruited (n=51 in the controls and cases) with a mean age of 45 years. Telehealth was not inferior to standard care with no significant increase in therapy time (p=0.441) or length of referral (p=0.047). There was no difference in clinical adverse events (p=0.741). Patients who received telehealth had significantly less withdrawals from the service (p = 0.031). Patient and therapist satisfaction were high, supporting the ongoing use and continued implementation of telehealth in occupational therapy.

An observational cohort study to determine the impact of research capacity building strategies implemented in an Australian metropolitan hospital occupational therapy department.

INTRODUCTION: Research capacity building enhances the abilities of individuals and is critical within health systems for quality patient care and promotes a culture of excellence within the occupational therapy profession. A research capacity building toolkit was proposed identifying strategies to support allied health professionals to undertake research. This study evaluated participant-reported outcomes of research capacity building toolkit implementation in an occupational therapy department. METHODS: An observational pre-post-cohort study at a tertiary hospital with volunteer occupational therapists using the standardised Research Capacity in Context Tool (RCCT) and an author-designed quality improvement (QI) survey was employed. The RCCT measures research capacity and culture at organisation, team and individual levels. Semi-structured interviews were used to elicit reflections regarding participant experience. RESULTS: All levels of the toolkit were implemented successfully. The response rate was 59% (n = 36) at baseline and 49.1% (n = 26) at follow-up. Eighty-five percent of participants held direct clinical roles. Nine clinicians participated in the interviews. There were significant improvements in the estimate mean for the organisation (6.51 [2019] compared with 8.13 [2020], p = <0.001) and the team (5.52 [2019] compared with 7.15 [2020], p = 0.001). The individual level did not significantly change with an estimate mean of 4.20 in 2019 increasing slightly to 4.84 in 2020 (p = 0.128). This was supported by the QI survey where improvements were noted in the department but not at an individual level. The qualitative findings verified the components of the toolkit including 'supporting clinicians in research', 'working together', 'valuing research for excellence' and reflected the importance of 'individual attributes'. CONCLUSION: The toolkit supported the implementation of specific strategies to enhance research capacity and culture. Improvements within the organisation and team were evident; however, these were not seen at an individual level. Further research about the contribution of individual-related factors and processes to the building of research capacity is required.

Providing fall prevention services in the emergency department: Is it effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of fall prevention services initiated in the emergency department (ED) to support patients after discharge. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Analysis of pooled data used random-effects modelling with results presented as a risk ratio (RR). RESULTS: Eleven studies were identified (n = 4,018). The proportion of older adults who fell did not differ between the intervention and control groups (RR 0.93; 95% CI, 0.82-1.06, I2 68%, P = 0.28). There was a significant (P = 0.01) reduction in the monthly rate of falling (RR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.91, I2 93%), fall-related injuries (RR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88, I2 0%, P = 0.001), and hospital admissions (RR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.90, I2 0%, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: ED fall prevention services did not significantly reduce the proportion of older adults who had future falls. However, multifactorial intervention significantly reduced fall-related injuries and hospital admissions with low heterogeneity.

Barriers and facilitators influencing adherence to occupational therapy home assessment recommendations: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe the barriers and facilitators that influence adherence to recommendations provided as part of an occupational therapy home assessment. INTRODUCTION: Home assessments, including environmental interventions, are commonly used by occupational therapists. Home assessment recommendations aim to support a patient's independence in their occupational roles and improve safety in the home. Research evaluating home assessments and adherence to recommended strategies is limited. However, low adherence has been associated with poorer outcomes including falls, deconditioning, and decreased function. This research aims to synthesize factors that influence adherence to home assessment recommendations. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will consider all qualitative and quantitative studies that report on adherence to recommendations provided during occupational therapy home assessments. Studies will include adults (>18) and/or their caregivers, who live in the community and receive an occupational therapy home assessment. METHODS: A mixed methods systematic review will be undertaken. Eight databases will be searched for studies published in English reporting on adherence following home assessments completed by occupational therapists published after January 2000. Study quality will be assessed using standardized JBI critical appraisal tools dependent on study design. Data extraction will be performed using a standardized tool, followed by data transformation. Data synthesis will follow the convergent integrated approach. All findings will be tabulated to explore factors that influence adherence. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42020159233.

Occupational therapist use of the 'Timed Up and Go' test in a Memory Clinic to compare performance between cognitive diagnoses and screen for falls risk.

INTRODUCTION: Occupational therapists assess older patients attending Memory Clinics to address multiple facets, including memory, activities of daily living function, mobility and falls risk. Identifying deficits in motor and functional abilities represents a crucial and necessary component of cognitive diagnosis. The aim of this research was to compare performance on the TUG between patients with normal (NC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. METHODS: A prospective single-blind single-centre cohort study was conducted in a Memory Clinic. Patients underwent comprehensive medical assessment, including the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) to determine a cognitive diagnosis. The occupational therapist, blinded to any diagnosis, completed the TUG. RESULTS: A total of 158 patients aged 60 years and older were recruited. The average TUG was 15.4 s, which was similar between men and women (p = .87). A TUG greater than ≥14 s was significantly associated with the use of a walking aid (p ≤ .001). The TUG increased with age and a slower TUG was associated with a greater number of previous falls (p = .023). The TUG did not significantly differ between patients with dementia, MCI and NC (p = .095). However, there was a significant difference comparing patients with NC and MCI (14.3 s) to those with dementia (16.4 s) (p = .048). There was a significant weak negative correlation between the MMSE and the TUG of -0.253 (p = .003). Univariate models showed that a patient's ability to ambulate independently contributed to 33% of the variance in the TUG, whereas previous falls contributed to 4%, highlighting the importance of physical function and intervention to target this. CONCLUSION: A simple TUG test should be considered for use by occupational therapists in a Memory Clinic to screen patients at risk of falling. Patients diagnosed with dementia have a significantly slower TUG. However, this tool cannot assist with the early detection of patients with MCI.

Australian modified Lawton's Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale contributes to diagnosing older adults with cognitive impairment.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of the Australian Modified Lawton's Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Scale (Modified Lawton's Scale) to screen for cognitive impairment in patients without physical or sensory deficits. METHODS: Prospective single-blind study of diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Data were available for 249 patients. At ≤25 points on the Modified Lawton's Scale, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for patients with dementia was 0.90 (95% CI 0.83, 0.96), with sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 84%. The scale had decreased ability to identify patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) with the AUC highest at 0.76 (95% CI 0.67, 0.84), with a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 74% at ≤26 points. The Modified Lawton's Scale had a significant strong correlation with the Mini-Mental State Examination (0.73) (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: A score of ≤25 on the Modified Lawton's Scale may indicate cognitive impairment impacting on IADL.

Kettle test efficacy in predicting cognitive and functional outcomes in geriatric rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Limited research has been available to support the use of the Kettle Test in a subacute rehabilitation setting with patients diagnosed with a variety of medical conditions. The Kettle Test is an occupation based performance measure designed to detect cognitive processes and function. The aim of this research was to measure the correlation between three cognitive tests, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Cognitive Functional Independence Measure (Cognitive FIM) and the Kettle Test. Secondly, to assess the efficacy of these tests in predicting functional outcomes via the motor subscale of the Functional Independence Measure (mFIM). METHODS: A prospective single-centre cohort study in a subacute rehabilitation setting of 97 patients. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients between the tests were statistically significant and moderately strong, with values ranging from 0.593 to -0.589. Significant positive correlations were seen between admission MMSE, Cognitive FIM and the mFIM and significant negative correlations between Kettle Test scores and the mFIM. The Kettle Test score had a stronger relationship with mFIM (r = -0.40; P < 0.01) compared to the Cognitive FIM (r = 0.33; P < 0.01) and MMSE (r = 0.26; P < 0.05). The Kettle Test variance is significantly associated with the MMSE and Cognitive FIM at admission and discharge measures. Modelling identified that age and gender significantly contribute to this relationship. When adjusted for age and gender the MMSE and Cognitive FIM both explained the 47% of the variance at discharge. CONCLUSION: There were statistically significant inter-test correlations between the MMSE, Cognitive FIM and Kettle Test. The Kettle Test had the strongest relationship to patient functional outcomes.

Cost analysis of a brief intervention for the prevention of falls after discharge from an emergency department.

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: There is considerable uncertainty around the cost-effectiveness of interventions for preventing secondary falls in older people presenting to emergency departments (ED). The objective was to complete an economic evaluation of a brief educational ED intervention aimed at preventing falls in older people post discharge. METHODS: A net cost analysis was completed from the health system perspective, using data from a controlled clinical trial, where an education intervention was compared to standard care. Patients aged 65 and older presenting to the ED with any diagnosis were enrolled. The costs, using Australian dollars (A$) at 2015 values, included resources required for the intervention and any health care cost incurred in the 6-month follow-up period (time horizon). Cost data were sourced through institutional billing records and liaison with the patient and their general practitioner. Mean costs and differences were analysed through nonparametric bootstrapping. RESULTS: The total costs in the control group (n = 201) were A$1 576 496 compared to A$1 292 130 in the intervention group (n = 211). The mean net cost per patient was A$7749 and A$6187 (P = 0.68) respectively resulting in a mean difference of A$1580 per patient in the intervention group (95% CI: A$-2806 to A$6150). Patients who presented to the ED with a fall diagnosis were reviewed through subgroup analysis. Total costs for patients who presented with a fall in the control group (n = 69) were A$708 995 compared to A$512 874 in the intervention group (n = 97). The mean net cost per patient was A$10 326 and A$5343 respectively (P = 0.33) with an overall saving of A$4624 per patient in the intervention group (95% CI: A$-2868 to A$15 426). CONCLUSIONS: A brief intervention had no net cost benefit across the whole study population, but is more cost effective in older people presenting to the ED with a fall.

Failure of falls risk screening tools to predict outcome: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the Falls Risk for Older Persons-Community Setting Screening Tool (FROP Com Screen) with the Two-Item Screening Tool in older adults presenting to the ED. METHODS: A prospective cohort study, comparing the efficacy of the two falls risk assessment tools by applying them simultaneously in a sample of hospital ED presentations. RESULTS: Two hundred and one patients over 65 years old were recruited. Thirty-six per cent reported falls in the 6-month follow-up period. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.57 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.66) for the FROP Com Screen and 0.54 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.63) for the Two-Item Screening Tool. FROP Com Screen had a sensitivity of 39% (95% CI 0.27 to 0.51) and a specificity of 70% (95% CI 0.61 to 0.78), while the Two-Item Screening Tool had a sensitivity of 48% (95% CI 0.36 to 0.60) and a specificity of 57% (95% CI 0.47 to 0.66). CONCLUSION: Both tools have limited predictive ability in the ED setting.

Controlled clinical trial exploring the impact of a brief intervention for prevention of falls in an emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the effectiveness of a brief intervention to prevent falls in older patients presenting to the ED post-discharge. METHODS: The present study is a prospective single-centre, quasi-randomised controlled clinical trial of a brief targeted educational intervention to prevent falls. The intervention group received brief scripted education and were advised of their percentage probability of falling in the next 6 months. The key message was to reinforce the importance of falls prevention strategies and the seriousness of falls. RESULTS: A total of 412 over 65 years old were recruited; 63 (32.1%) patients in the intervention group and 67 (36.8%) in the control group reported falls in the 6 month follow up period (OR 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-1.25, P = 0.34). No significant differences were noted for mortalities (P = 0.54), ED representations (P = 0.15) and medication changes (P = 0.17). Patients receiving intervention had less hospital admissions (P = 0.002) after adjustment for confounding variables. Intervention patients who presented with a fall had significant (P = 0.007) improvement in function at 6 months, whereas those not presenting with a fall experienced functional decline. CONCLUSION: A brief intervention was associated with maintenance of function in fallers and reduced hospital admissions, without preventing falls post-discharge.

Effects of emergency department Care Coordination Team referrals in older people presenting with a fall.

OBJECTIVES: The study aims to describe the characteristics of patients presenting to an ED with a fall and evaluate multidisciplinary Care Coordination Team (CCT) referrals on patient outcomes. METHODS: A single-centred retrospective analysis of electronic data at an adult tertiary hospital was performed using data from 2004 to 2009 of presentations for patients aged 65 years or over with a fall. The primary outcome measure was representation to hospital within 30 days, comparing patients referred to CCT and those not referred. Secondary outcomes were differences in demographic characteristics, mode of arrival, triage score and readmission. RESULTS: The proportion of ED patients presenting with a fall and their mean age is stable over time. From 2006 to 2009, 5162 fallers were referred to CCT in a decreasing trend, but with increased urgency. Statistically significant predictors for being referred to CCT were increasing age, being female, arriving by ambulance, being transferred from a nursing home and higher socioeconomic category. Arrival by ambulance and a history of previous falls were associated with representation and readmission. A decreasing trend from 2006 to 2009 was seen in rate ratios and odds ratios via regression modelling for both representation and readmission in patients referred to CCT. CONCLUSION: Maturing of the CCT is associated with a decrease in representation and readmission rate. Over time, the CCT attended higher urgency patients associated with stable admission rates. These associations were not significant and the clinical effectiveness of ED CCTs requires further examination.