ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To develop an effective selection procedure for lower limb functional neurostimulation (LLFNS) for standing in paraplegia. DESIGN: The selection procedure and exclusion criteria were based on the previous experience for two clinical centres with experience of LLFNS. SETTING: Two Regional Spinal Injuries units in southern England. SUBJECTS: 254 fully rehabilitated paraplegics living in the community. INTERVENTION: Patients were invited to participate in the programme, and if suitable to subject themselves to a rigorous staged selection procedure from which they could withdraw at any time. OUTCOME MEASURE: Functionally successful home standing using closed-loop surface electrical stimulation. RESULTS: 57/254 patients were suitable on paper and were accessible. 19 of these (CI = 10-28) were interested in the project and attended one of the spinal centres for details. Twelve (CI = 5-19) of these fulfilled the selection criteria and started on the training programme; and 10 of them completed the muscle training programme successfully. Seven patients (CI = 2-12) achieved closed-loop standing in the laboratory and four patients (CI = 1-8) did so at home.
Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation , Leg/surgery , Paraplegia/therapy , Patient-Centered Care , Personnel Selection , Prostheses and Implants , Adult , Anxiety/etiology , Bone Density , Depression/etiology , Female , Humans , Leg/blood supply , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle Spasticity/physiopathology , Muscles/pathology , Muscles/physiopathology , Paraplegia/physiopathology , Paraplegia/psychology , Physical Endurance/physiology , Regional Blood Flow/physiology , TorqueABSTRACT
We have implanted an intradural array of 12 tripolar electrodes on the anterior roots L2-S2, left and right, at cauda equina level, in a 33-year-old woman with a complete T9 cord lesion of 3 years' duration. They are driven by an implanted multiplexed stimulator system using radio frequency (RF) power and control signals. All channels generate movements, in patterns that might be predicted from the known anatomy of the cauda equina. In particular, stimulation of L2 and L3 gives hip adduction; L3, L4, and L5 gives quadriceps femoris movements; L5, S1, and S2 gives hamstrings movement; and S1 and S2 give plantar flexion. Stimulation of L5 gives mixed movements at the ankle. Surprisingly, stimulation of the L2 roots has not given strong hip flexion. Responses have been stable. Some thresholds have varied, probably as a result of tissue encapsulation. The moment generated within each degree of freedom of the legs has been measured for each root, using a specially designed multimoment measurement apparatus. For several roots, a movement of lower threshold may be accompanied by a second movement of higher electrical threshold, suggesting that different muscles may have fiber populations that differ in their diameter or their location in the root. The use of stimulus forms that enable selective anodal block may, in the future, enable separation of two distinct movements from a single motor root.
