Surface guided radiotherapy practice in paediatric oncology: a survey on behalf of the SIOPE Radiation Oncology Working Group.

INTRODUCTION: Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) is increasingly being implemented to track patient's surface movement and position during radiation therapy. However, limited information is available on the SGRT use in paediatrics. The aim of this double survey was to map SIOPE (European Society for Paediatric Oncology)-affiliated centres using SGRT and to gain information on potential indications, observed, or expected benefits. METHODS: A double online survey was distributed to 246 SIOPE-affiliated radiotherapy (RT) centres. Multiple choices, yes/no, and open answers were included. The first survey (41 questions) was active from February to March 2021. A shortened version (13 questions) was repeated in March 2023 to detect trends in SGRT use within the same community. RESULTS: Respectively, 76/142 (54%) and 28/142 (20%) responding centres used and planned to use SGRT clinically, including 4/34 (12%) new centres since 2021. Among the SGRT users, 33/76 (43%) already applied this technology to paediatric treatments. The main benefits of improved patient comfort, better monitoring of intrafraction motion, and more accurate initial patient set-up expected by future users did not differ from current SGRT-users (P = .893). Among non-SGRT users, the main hurdles to implement SGRT were costs and time for installation. In paediatrics, SGRT is applied to all anatomical sites. CONCLUSION: This work provides information on the practice of SGRT in paediatrics across SIOPE-affiliated RT centres which can serve as a basis for departments when considering the purchase of SGRT systems. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Since little information is available in the literature on the use of SGRT in paediatrics, the results of this double survey can serve as a basis for departments treating children when considering the purchase of an SGRT system.

Combined Photon and Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy for Sinonasal Malignancies: Results of the HIT-SNT Prospective Phase 2 Trial.

PURPOSE: Radiation treatment of sinonasal malignancies is a challenging task due to proximity to critical structures of the head and neck and skull base. Local tumor control is highly dose-dependent, but dose application is limited due to accompanying toxicity and dose constraints. To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of combined radiation treatment with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and carbon ion boost, we conducted a prospective phase 2 IMRT-Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Sinonasal Tumors (HIT-SNT) trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2011 and 2019, we treated 35 patients with histologically proven, incompletely resected or inoperable adeno- (51%) or squamous cell carcinoma (49%) of the paranasal sinuses with combined IMRT (50 Gy) and carbon ion boost (24 Gy relative biologic effectiveness) to a total dose of 74 Gy. RESULTS: Acute mucositis Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3 occurred in 12% of patients (n = 4) and was accompanied by odynophagia CTCAE grade 3. Except for 1 case of grade 3 weight loss, no other acute high-grade toxicity (grade 3-4) was observed. In a small patient cohort of 15 patients eligible for long-term follow-up we have seen no high-grade (grade ≥3) long-term side effects 2 years after radiation therapy. None of these patients suffered from therapy-associated vision or hearing loss. Secondary endpoints were 2-year overall survival, 2-year local progression-free survival, 2-year progression-free survival, and 2-year metastases-free survival with 79.4%, 61.8%, 61.8%, and 64.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective data on toxicity and outcome of bimodal radiation therapy for the rare entity of sinonasal malignancies. Our study shows a low rate of CTCAE-reported acute toxicity with reasonable tumor control and survival rates after bimodal radiation therapy, which therefore remains a therapy approach to be further evaluated.

Outcome after proton beam therapy versus photon-based radiation therapy in childhood-onset craniopharyngioma patients-results of KRANIOPHARYNGEOM 2007.

Background: Proton beam therapy (PBT) is being increas16ingly used to treat residual craniopharyngioma (CP) after hypothalamus-sparing surgery. Compared to photon-based radiation therapy (XRT) with PBT, less irradiation in the penumbra reduces the scattered dose to critical organs neighboring but outside the area of treatment, minimizing the risk of sequelae. Patients and methods: Between 2007 and 2019, 99 of 290 (34%) childhood-onset CP patients recruited in KRANIOPHARYNGEOM 2007 received external radiation therapy (RT) (65% PBT, 35% XRT). Outcome was analyzed in terms of survival, endocrinological and anthropometric parameters (BMI and height SDS), quality of life (QoL using PEDQOL), and functional capacity (FMH) with special regard to irradiation technique. Results: PBT became predominant (used in 43% and 72% of all irradiated patients registered within the first and second halves of the recruitment period, between 2008 and 2013 and 2013 and 2018, respectively). Five-year event-free survival rates after PBT or XRT were comparable (92% ± 4% vs. 91% ± 4%, p = 0.42) and higher than for the whole cohort since diagnosis, including non-RT patients (37% ± 4%). Radiation doses to the hypothalamus and pituitary did not differ between PBT and XRT. Endocrine deficits due to disturbances of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis (HPA) were already common before irradiation. During the first 5 years after CP diagnosis/RT, no differences between PBT, XRT, and non-RT CP patients concerning functional capacity and anthropometric parameters have been obtained. Only for the PEDQOL domain "physical function", parental-assessed QoL was lower 12 months after PBT versus XRT or non-RT patients. Conclusion: QoL, functional capacity, degree of obesity, and endocrinopathy varied over time from diagnosis, but by 5 years, there was no significant difference between PBT and XRT upfront or delayed, nor was there any compromise in historic survival rates, which remained high >90%. RT of any type is extremely effective at stabilizing disease after hypothalamic-sparing surgery. The purported specific benefits of PBT-reducing sequelae are not proven in this study where the organ of critical interest is itself diseased, increasing an urgent need to better address and treat the tumor-induced endocrine harm from diagnosis in dedicated pituitary services. Other hypothesized benefits of PBT versus XRT on vascular events and secondary cancers await longer comparison. Clinical trial registration number: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/, identifier NCT01272622.

Radiotherapy with Helium Ions Has the Potential to Improve Both Endocrine and Neurocognitive Outcome in Pediatric Patients with Ependymoma.

Ependymomas are the third most-frequent pediatric brain tumors. To prevent local recurrence, the resection site should be irradiated. Compared to photon radiation treatment, proton therapy often achieves even better results regarding target coverage and organ-sparing. Due to their physical properties, helium ions could further reduce side effects, providing better protection of healthy tissue despite similar target coverage. In our in silico study, 15 pediatric ependymoma patients were considered. All patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapeutic treatment with active-scanned protons at Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT). Both helium ion and highly conformal IMRT plans were calculated to evaluate the potential dosimetric advantage of ion beam therapy compared to the current state-of-the-art photon-based treatments. To estimate the potential clinical benefit of helium ions, normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) were calculated. Target coverage was comparable in all three modalities. As expected, the integral dose absorbed by healthy brain tissue could be significantly reduced with protons by up to -48% vs. IMRT. Even compared to actively scanned protons, relative dose reductions for critical neuronal structures of up to another -39% were achieved when using helium ions. The dose distribution of helium ions is significantly superior when compared to proton therapy and IMRT due to the improved sparing of OAR. In fact, previous studies could clearly demonstrate that the dosimetric advantage of protons translates into a measurable clinical benefit for pediatric patients with brain tumors. Given the dose-response relationship of critical organs at risk combined with NTCP calculation, the results of our study provide a strong rationale that the use of helium ions has the potential to even further reduce the risk for treatment related sequelae.

Intensity modulated proton therapy for early-stage glottic cancer: high-precision approach to laryngeal function preservation with exceptional treatment tolerability.

BACKGROUND: Due to the increasing expertise in transoral laser surgery and image-guided radiation therapy, treatment outcomes have recently improved in patients with early-stage glottic cancer. The objective of the current study was to evaluate intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) as novel treatment option. METHODS: A total of 15 patients with T1-2N0 glottic squamous cell carcinoma, treated between 2017 and 2020, were evaluated. Toxicity was recorded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03. RESULTS: The majority were T1a/b tumors (66.7%) and no patient had lymph node or distant metastases. The median total dose was 70 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) (range 66-70 Gy RBE). The one- and two-year OS and metastases-free survival were 100%. One patient developed local failure and received salvage laryngectomy. No higher-grade acute or late toxicity was reported. The mean number of CTCAE grade I and II overall toxicity events per patient was 4.1 (95%-[confidence interval] CI 3.1-5.3) and 1.0 (95%-CI 0.5-1.5). CONCLUSION: High-precision proton therapy of T1-2N0 glottic cancer resulted in exceptional treatment tolerability with high rates of laryngeal function preservation and promising oncological outcome. IMPT has the potential to become a standard treatment option for patients with early-stage laryngeal cancer.

Inoperable or incompletely resected craniofacial osteosarcoma treated by particle radiotherapy.

Background: To report survival of craniofacial osteosarcoma patients treated by particle radiotherapy. Methods: Between January 2010 and December 2021, 51 patients with primary (N = 35) or recurrent (N = 16) inoperable or incompletely resected craniofacial osteosarcoma were treated. In most cases, intracranial infiltration (59%) and macroscopic tumor on MRI/CT (75%) were present. Thirteen had a secondary osteosarcoma (25%). Treatment concepts included combined ion beam radiotherapy (CIBRT, N = 18), protons only (N = 3), carbon ions only (N = 12), IMRT with a carbon ion boost (N = 5), and carbon ion re-irradiation (N = 13). Eighty percent (N = 41) received additionally chemotherapy, most frequently EURAMOS-1 (47%) or EURO-B.O.S.S. (18%). Results: The median age was 38, and all patients finished treatment predominantly as outpatients (N = 44). Information on overall survival was available for N = 49 patients. The median follow-up of the survivors was 55 months. For the whole cohort 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 82.8%, 60.4%, 55.2%, and 51.7%, respectively. Those treated by CIBRT (N = 17) demonstrated a superior OS with 92.9% after 1 and 2 years and 83.6% after 3 and 5 years. The median clinical target volume (CTV) was 192.7 and 95.2 cc for the primary and boost plan, respectively. CIBRT, primary diagnosis, age ≤40a, and no macroscopic residual tumor were associated with improved survival in univariate analysis (p = 0.006, p = 0.004, p = 0.002, p = 0.026, respectively), while any foregoing resection compared to biopsy was not identified as a prognostic factor. CIBRT and no macroscopic residual tumor were confirmed as independent predictors of OS on multivariate analysis (HR = 0.107, 95% CI = [0.014, 0.797], p = 0.029 and HR = 0.130, 95% CI = [0.023, 0.724], p = 0.020, respectively). No acute toxicity > grade III was observed. Conclusion: CIBRT shows promising results for patients with inoperable or incompletely resected craniofacial osteosarcoma.

Radiation induced contrast enhancement after proton beam therapy in patients with low grade glioma - How safe are protons?

PURPOSE: The optimal treatment strategy for low-grade glioma (LGG) is still a matter of controversy. Considering that the prognosis is typically favorable, the prevention of late sequelae is of particular importance. Proton beam therapy (PRT) has the potential to further reduce the burden of treatment related side effects. We set out to evaluate the clinical outcome of proton irradiation with a particular focus on morphologic features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: We assessed prospectively 110 patients who received radiotherapy with protons for histologically proven LGG. Clinical and radiological information were analyzed resulting in more than 1200 available MRI examinations with a median follow-up of 39 months. Newly diagnosed contrast-enhancing lesions on MRI were delineated and correlated with parameters of the corresponding treatment plan. A voxel-based dose-matched paired analysis of the linear energy transfer (LET) inside vs outside lesions was performed. RESULTS: Proton beam irradiation of patients with low-grade glioma results in overall survival (OS) of 90% after seven years. Median progression free survival had not yet been reached with surviving fraction of 54% after seven years. The incidence of temporary or clinically silent radiation induced contrast enhancement was significantly higher than previously assumed, however, symptomatic radiation necrosis was only detected in one patient. These radiation-induced contrast-enhancing lesions were almost exclusively seen at the distal beam end of the proton beam. In 22 out of 23 patients, the average LET of voxels inside contrast-enhancing lesions was significantly increased, compared to dose-matched voxels outside the lesions. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic radiation necrosis following PRT was as rare as conventional photon-based treatment series suggest. However, the increased incidence of asymptomatic radiation-induced brain injuries with an increased average LET observed in this cohort provides strong clinical evidence to support the hypothesis that the relative biological effectiveness of protons is variable and different to the fixed factor of 1.1 currently used worldwide.

Dual-layer spectral CT for proton, helium, and carbon ion beam therapy planning of brain tumors.

Pretreatment computed tomography (CT) imaging is an essential component of the particle therapy treatment planning chain. Treatment planning and optimization with charged particles require accurate and precise estimations of ion beam range in tissues, characterized by the stopping power ratio (SPR). Reduction of range uncertainties arising from conventional CT-number-to-SPR conversion based on single-energy CT (SECT) imaging is of importance for improving clinical practice. Here, the application of a novel imaging and computational methodology using dual-layer spectral CT (DLCT) was performed toward refining patient-specific SPR estimates. A workflow for DLCT-based treatment planning was devised to evaluate SPR prediction for proton, helium, and carbon ion beam therapy planning in the brain. DLCT- and SECT-based SPR predictions were compared in homogeneous and heterogeneous anatomical regions. This study included eight patients scanned for diagnostic purposes with a DLCT scanner. For each patient, four different treatment plans were created, simulating tumors in different parts of the brain. For homogeneous anatomical regions, mean SPR differences of about 1% between the DLCT- and SECT-based approaches were found. In plans of heterogeneous anatomies, relative (absolute) proton range shifts of 0.6% (0.4 mm) in the mean and up to 4.4% (2.1 mm) at the distal fall-off were observed. In the investigated cohort, 12% of the evaluated organs-at-risk (OARs) presented differences in mean or maximum dose of more than 0.5 Gy (RBE) and up to 6.8 Gy (RBE) over the entire treatment. Range shifts and dose differences in OARs between DLCT and SECT in helium and carbon ion treatment plans were similar to protons. In the majority of investigated cases (75th percentile), SECT- and DLCT-based range estimations were within 0.6 mm. Nonetheless, the magnitude of patient-specific range deviations between SECT and DLCT was clinically relevant in heterogeneous anatomical sites, suggesting further study in larger, more diverse cohorts. Results indicate that patients with brain tumors may benefit from DLCT-based treatment planning.

The role of combined ion-beam radiotherapy (CIBRT) with protons and carbon ions in a multimodal treatment strategy of inoperable osteosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the role of combined ion-beam radiotherapy (CIBRT) with protons and carbon ions in a multimodal treatment strategy of inoperable osteosarcoma; final analysis of a one-armed, single center phase I/II trial. METHODS: Between August 2011 until September 2018, 20 patients with primary (N = 18), metastatic (N = 3), or recurrent (N = 2) inoperable pelvic (70%) or craniofacial (30%) osteosarcoma were treated with protons up to 54 Gy (RBE) and a carbon ion boost of 18 Gy (RBE) and followed until May 2019. A Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was performed before CIBRT in search for a prognostic factor. The primary endpoint was toxicity. Secondary endpoints included treatment response, global, local and distant progression free survival (PFS, LPFS and DPFS) and overall (OS), among others. RESULTS: The median age was 20; all patients finished treatment per protocol. LPFS, DPFS, PFS and OS were 73%, 74%, 60% and 75% after one year and 55%, 65% 65.3%, 45% and 68% after two years, respectively. The median clinical target volume (CTV) was 1042 cc and 415 cc for the primary and boost plan, respectively. Craniofacial localization, lower uptake of FDG in PET/CT and boost plan CTV ≤ median were associated with improved overall survival (p = 0.039, p = 0.016 and p = 0.0043, respectively). No acute toxicities > grade III were observed. We observed one case of secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) seven months after CIBRT for recurrent disease and one case of hearing loss. CONCLUSION: CIBRT shows a favorable toxicity profile and promising results particularly for patients with inoperable craniofacial osteosarcoma.

Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy with Carbon Ion Radiotherapy Boost for Acinic Cell Carcinoma of the Salivary Glands.

Aim: to report clinical outcome in patients with acinic cell carcinoma of the salivary glands treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) boost. Materials and Methods: all patients with acinic cell carcinoma of the salivary glands treated at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center were considered for this retrospective analysis. All patients received a CIRT boost with 18-24 Gy radiobiologic effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose in 3 Gy RBE-weighted dose per fraction followed by IMRT, with 50-54 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction. Disease outcome was evaluated for local (LR), nodal (NR), distant recurrence (DR), and disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Morbidity was scored based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5. Descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier method were used for analysis. Results: fifteen patients were available for analysis. Median follow-up after radiotherapy was 43 months. Six patients were treated for primary disease and nine for recurrent disease. Eight patients were treated with radiotherapy for macroscopic disease. Disease recurrence was observed in four patients: 1 LR, 2 NR, and 2 DR; 5-year local control, DFS, and OS were 80%, 52%, and 80%, respectively. No radiotherapy-related G3-5 morbidity was observed. Conclusion: In acinic cell carcinoma, IMRT with carbon ion radiotherapy boost leads to excellent results after R1-resection and is a promising treatment modality for definitive treatment in inoperable patients.

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) With Simultaneously Integrated Boost Shortens Treatment Time and Is Noninferior to Conventional Radiation Therapy Followed by Sequential Boost in Adjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment: Results of a Large Randomized Phase III Trial (IMRT-MC2 Trial).

PURPOSE: In the modern era, improvements in radiation therapy techniques have paved the way for simultaneous integrated boost irradiation in adjuvant breast radiation therapy after breast conservation surgery. Nevertheless, randomized trials supporting the noninferiority of this treatment to historical standards of care approach are lacking. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial (NCT01322854) was performed to analyze noninferiority of conventional fractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost (IMRT-SIB) to 3-D conformal radiation therapy with sequential boost (3-D-CRT-seqB) for breast cancer patients. Primary outcomes were local control (LC) rates at 2 and 5 years (noninferiority margin at hazard ratio [HR] of 3.5) as well as cosmetic results 6 weeks and 2 years after radiation therapy (evaluated via photo documentation calculating the relative breast retraction assessment [pBRA] score [noninferiority margin of 1.25]). RESULTS: A total of 502 patients were randomly assigned from 2011 to 2015. After a median follow-up of 5.1 years, the 2-year LC for the IMRT-SIB arm was noninferior to the 3-D-CRT-seqB arm (99.6% vs 99.6%, respectively; HR, 0.602; 95% CI, 0.123-2.452; P = .487). In addition, noninferiority was also shown for cosmesis after IMRT-SIB and 3-D-CRT-seqB at both 6 weeks (median pBRA, 9.1% vs 9.1%) and 2 years (median pBRA, 10.4% vs 9.8%) after radiation therapy (95% CI, -0.317 to 0.107 %; P = .332). Cosmetic assessment according to the Harvard scale by both the patient and the treating physician as well as late-toxicity evaluation with the late effects normal tissues- subjective, objective, management, analytic criteria, a score for the evaluation of long-term adverse effects in normal tissue, revealed no significant differences between treatment arms. In addition, there was no difference in overall survival rates (99.6% vs 99.6%; HR, 3.281; 95% CI: -0.748 to 22.585; P = .148) for IMRT-SIB and 3-D-CRT-seqB, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective trial reporting the noninferiority of IMRT-SIB versus 3-D-CRT-seqB with respect to cosmesis and LC at 2 years of follow-up. This treatment regimen considerably shortens adjuvant radiation therapy times without compromising clinical outcomes.

Acute toxicity of normofractionated intensity modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with sequential boost in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) improves dose homogeneity and late toxicity compared to simple tangential techniques in adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy for patients with breast cancer. Simultaneous-integrated boost (SIB) radiotherapy shortens the overall treatment time and improves dose homogeneity. However, prospective randomized trials regarding IMRT with SIB for adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer are lacking. METHODS: The IMRT-MC2 (MINT) trial is a phase III prospective randomized controlled trial comparing IMRT with SIB (Arm A: whole breast 28 × 1.8 Gy, Boost 28 × 2.3 Gy) to 3D-conformal radiotherapy with a sequential boost (Arm B: whole breast 28 × 1.8 Gy, boost 8 × 2 Gy) in patients with breast cancer after BCS. Indication for boost radiotherapy was defined as age < 70 years or age > 70 years with presence of additional risk factors. This is a retrospective analysis of acute toxicity at one of two trial sites. RESULTS: Five hundred two patients were randomized, of which 446 patients were eligible for this analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of any grade radiation dermatitis between the two treatment arms at the end of treatment (p = 0.26). However, radiation dermatitis grade 2/3 (29.1% vs. 20.1 and 3.5% vs. 2.3%) occurred significantly more often in Arm A (p = 0.02). Breast/chest wall pain at the first follow-up visit was significantly more common in patients treated on Arm B (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment on both arms was well tolerated, however there were some differences regarding radiodermatitis and breast pain. Further analyses are ongoing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov , NCT01322854 , registered 24th March 2011.

Carbon ion reirradiation compared to intensity-modulated re-radiotherapy for recurrent head and neck cancer (CARE): a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Intensity-modulated re-radiotherapy (reIMRT) has been established as a standard local treatment option in patients with non-resectable, recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC). However, the clinical outcome is unfavorable and severe toxicities (≥grade III) occurred in 30-40% of patients. The primary aim of the current trial is to investigate carbon ion reirradiation (reCIRT) compared to reIMRT in patients with rHNC regarding safety/toxicity as well as local control, overall survival (OS), and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: The present trial will be performed as a single center, two-armed, prospective phase II study. A maximum of 72 patients will be treated with either reIMRT or reCIRT to evaluate severe (≥grade III) treatment-related toxicities (randomization ratio 1:1). The primary target value is to generate less than 35% acute/subacute severe toxicity (≥grade III), according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0, within 6 months after study treatment. The total dose of reirradiation will range between 51 and 60 Gy or Gy (RBE), depending primarily on the radiotherapy interval and the cumulative dose to organs at risk. Individual dose prescription will be at the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist. The local and distant progression-free survival 12 months after reirradiation, the OS, and the QoL are the secondary endpoints of the trial. Explorative trial objectives are the longitudinal investigation of clinical patient-related parameters, tumor parameters on radiological imaging, and blood-based tumor analytics. DISCUSSION: Recent retrospective studies suggested that reCIRT could represent a feasible and effective treatment modality for rHNC. This current randomized prospective trial is the first to investigate the toxicity and clinical outcome of reCIRT compared to reIMRT in patients with rHNC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ; NCT04185974 ; December 4th 2019.

Dose-Limiting Organs at Risk in Carbon Ion Re-Irradiation of Head and Neck Malignancies: An Individual Risk-Benefit Tradeoff.

Background: Carbon ion re-irradiation (CIR) was evaluated to investigate treatment planning and the consequences of individual risk-benefit evaluations concerning dose-limiting organs at risk (OAR). Methods: A total of 115 consecutive patients with recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) were analyzed after initial radiotherapy and CIR at the same anatomical site. Toxicities were evaluated in line with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.03. Results: The median maximum cumulative equivalent doses applied in fractions of 2 Gy (EQD2) to the brainstem, optic chiasm, ipsilateral optic nerve, and spinal cord were 56.8 Gy (range 0.94-103.9), 51.4 Gy (range 0-120.3 Gy), 63.6 Gy (range 0-146.1 Gy), and 28.8 Gy (range 0.2-87.7 Gy). The median follow up after CIR was 24.0 months (range 2.5-72.0 months). The cumulative rates of acute and late severe (≥grade III) side effects after CIR were 1.8% and 14.3%. Conclusion: In recurrent HNC, an individual risk-benefit tradeoff is frequently inevitable due to unfavorable location of tumors in close proximity to vital OAR. There are uncertainties about the dose tolerance of OAR after CIR, which warrant increased awareness about the potential treatment toxicity and further studies on heavy ion re-irradiation.

Dosimetric Comparison of Proton Radiation Therapy, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy Based on Intracranial Tumor Location.

(1) Background: Selecting patients that will benefit the most from proton radiotherapy (PRT) is of major importance. This study sought to assess dose reductions to numerous organs-at-risk (OARs) with PRT, as compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), as a function of tumor location. (2) Materials/Methods: Patients with intracranial neoplasms (all treated with PRT) were stratified into five location-based groups (frontal, suprasellar, temporal, parietal, posterior cranial fossa; n = 10 per group). Each patient was re-planned for 3DCRT and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using similar methodology, including the originally planned target and organ-at-risk (OAR) dose constraints. (3) Results: In parietal tumors, PRT showed the most pronounced dose reductions. PRT lowered doses to nearly every OAR, most notably the optical system and several contralateral structures (subventricular zone, thalamus, hippocampus). For frontal lobe cases, the greatest relative dose reductions in mean dose (Dmean) with PRT were to the infratentorial normal brain, contralateral hippocampus, brainstem, pituitary gland and contralateral optic nerve. For suprasellar lesions, PRT afforded the greatest relative Dmean reductions to the infratentorial brain, supratentorial brain, and the whole brain. Similar results could be observed in temporal and posterior cranial fossa disease. (4) Conclusions: The effectiveness and degree of PRT dose-sparing to various OARs depends on intracranial tumor location. These data will help to refine selection of patients receiving PRT, cost-effectiveness, and future clinical toxicity assessment.

Treatment of meningioma and glioma with protons and carbon ions.

The rapid rise of particle therapy across the world necessitates evidence to justify its ever-increasing utilization. This narrative review summarizes the current status of these technologies on treatment of both meningiomas and gliomas, the most common benign and malignant primary brain tumors, respectively. Proton beam therapy (PBT) for meningiomas displays high rates of long-term local control, low rates of symptomatic deterioration, along with the potential for safe dose-escalation in select (but not necessarily routine) cases. PBT is also associated with low adverse events and maintenance of functional outcomes, which have implications for quality of life and cost-effectiveness measures going forward. Data on carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) are limited; existing series describe virtually no high-grade toxicities and high local control. Regarding the few available data on low-grade gliomas, PBT provides opportunities to dose-escalate while affording no increase of severe toxicities, along with maintaining appropriate quality of life. Although dose-escalation for low-grade disease has been less frequently performed than for glioblastoma, PBT and CIRT continue to be utilized for the latter, and also have potential for safer re-irradiation of high-grade gliomas. For both neoplasms, the impact of superior dosimetric profiles with endpoints such as neurocognitive decline and neurologic funcionality, are also discussed to the extent of requiring more data to support the utility of particle therapy. Caveats to these data are also described, such as the largely retrospective nature of the available studies, patient selection, and heterogeneity in patient population as well as treatment (including mixed photon/particle treatment). Nevertheless, multiple prospective trials (which may partially attenuate those concerns) are also discussed. In light of the low quantity and quality of available data, major questions remain regarding economic concerns as well.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma - Pleural cavity irradiation after decortication with helical tomotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive disease that poses a treatment challenge in spite of recent technical developments. The aim of this retrospective analysis is to assess the feasibility of administering intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to the pleural cavity using helical tomotherapy in patients who had undergone pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) and also the resulting toxicity levels. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients who had MPM and had undergone P/D were treated with pleural cavity irradiation that included a median dose of 52.2 Gy using helical tomotherapy. The median age of the patients was 53 years (31-74). In addition to clinical and diagnostic findings from regular follow-up examinations, we evaluated the dose distribution for other organs at risk to assess treatment in relation to toxicity, with special regard for the underlying intact lung. RESULTS: The mean lung dose on the treatment site was 32.8 Gy (±6.8). The V20 Gy was 71.7% (±17.2). No treatment-related toxicity that exceeded grade III according to common toxicity criteria (CTC) was observed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13 months with a median overall survival (OAS) of 19 months. CONCLUSION: The findings of this analysis provide data indicating that sparing the underlying lung in patients with MPM after P/D is not only feasible with helical tomotherapy, but that this treatment also causes reasonably few side effects.

Metformin Enhanced in Vitro Radiosensitivity Associates with G2/M Cell Cycle Arrest and Elevated Adenosine-5'-monophosphate-activated Protein Kinase Levels in Glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: It is hypothesized that metabolism plays a strong role in cancer cell regulation. We have recently demonstrated improved progression-free survival in patients with glioblastoma who received metformin as an antidiabetic substance during chemoradiation. Although metformin is well-established in clinical use the influence of metformin in glioblastoma is far from being understood especially in combination with other treatment modalities such as radiation and temozolomide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we examined the influence of metformin in combinations with radiation and temozolomide on cell survival (clonogenic survival), cell cycle (routine flow cytometric analysis, FACScan), and phosphorylated Adenosine-5'-monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) (Phopho-AMPKalpha1 - ELISA) levels in glioblastoma cell lines LN18 and LN229. RESULTS: Metformin and temozolomide enhanced the effectiveness of photon irradiation in glioblastoma cells. Cell toxicity was more pronounced in O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter non-methylated LN18 cells. Induction of a G2/M phase cell cycle block through metformin and combined treatments was observed up to 72 h. These findings were associated with elevated levels of activated AMPK levels in LN229 cells but not in LN18 cells after irradiation, metformin, and temozolomide treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Radiosensitizing effects of metformin on glioblastoma cells treated with irradiation and temozolomide in vitro coincided with G2/M arrest and changes in pAMPK levels.