A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase PH20 Administered Intravenously in Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20) is used in subcutaneous formulations (eg, RITUXAN HYCELA [rituximab and hyaluronidase human], HERCEPTIN HYLECTA [trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk], PHESGO [pertuzumab/trastuzumab/hyaluronidase-zzxf], and Darzalex FASPRO [daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj]) to increase the dispersion and absorption of coadministered therapeutics. Although unlikely, subcutaneous products that include rHuPH20 could be mistaken for the intravenous formulation of the corresponding drugs (eg, RITUXAN [rituximab], HERCEPTIN [trastuzumab], and DARZALEX [daratumumab]). To understand the potential effects of inadvertent intravenous injection of rHuPH20, we investigated the safety profile, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of rHuPH20 administered intravenously. OBJECTIVES: This Phase I, open-label, single-center study in healthy volunteers was designed to assess the safety profile, tolerability, PK, and PD of rHuPH20 administered intravenously. METHODS: Healthy volunteers received 5 mL intravenous infusion of either 10,000 U (n = 12) or 30,000 U (n = 12) rHuPH20 over 5 minutes. Blood samples for PK and PD analysis were obtained at baseline and at various times after initiation of infusion. Adverse events and laboratory parameters were measured to assess the safety profile and tolerability of the intravenous infusion. The PK of rHuPH20 was assessed using both an enzymatic assay and a mass-based immunoassay, and plasma hyaluronan concentrations were measured as a PD marker using an HPLC-MS/MS disaccharide assay. RESULTS: All 24 volunteers (mean age = 36.5 years) completed the study, and no serious adverse events were reported in either treatment group. Overall, 2 adverse events (both Grade 1) were reported; catheter site pain in the 10,000 U group and hypotension in the 30,000 U group. Plasma concentrations of rHuPH20 increased during the 5-minute intravenous infusion (median tmax = 6 minutes from intravenous initiation) followed by a rapid plasma clearance (t1/2 ∼10 minutes from intravenous initiation). Plasma hyaluronan concentrations increased with dose and time (tmax range = 45‒120 minutes from intravenous initiation) and returned to baseline within 1 week of administration. Changes in both PK and PD measurements appeared proportional to dose. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that intravenous administration of up to 30,000 U rHuPH20 was well tolerated, rapidly cleared from the plasma, and did not appear to be associated with any serious adverse effects at doses used in subcutaneous therapeutic products. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2020; 81).

Tolerability and pharmacokinetic properties of ondansetron administered subcutaneously with recombinant human hyaluronidase in minipigs and healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous ondansetron facilitated by recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20) is an alternative for treating nausea/vomiting in patients who cannot receive ondansetron by other routes of administration. OBJECTIVE: Based on preclinical results in minipigs, a Phase I study was designed to assess the tolerability and pharmacokinetic properties of subcutaneous ondansetron + rHuPH20 compared with intramuscular, intravenous, or oral ondansetron monotherapy in healthy volunteers. METHODS: In a crossover design, 3 minipigs were dosed with subcutaneous ondansetron 0.08 mg/kg + rHuPH20, or as intramuscular or intravenous monotherapy, for the evaluation of plasma ondansetron concentrations and local tolerability. In a randomized, open-label, 4-way crossover study, subjects received a randomized sequence of SC ondansetron 4 mg + rHuPH20, or ondansetron monotherapy IM (4 mg), IV (4 mg), or PO (8 mg), over 4 daily visits. Study participants included healthy volunteers aged 19 to 65 years with adequate venous access in both upper extremities and no history of QT-interval prolongation. Primary tolerability end points (administration-site observations, systemic adverse events [AEs], and subject-assessed pain) were assessed, and pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC, Cmax, Tmax, t½) were computed to compare relative rate and extent of systemic exposure. Results were described using summary statistics, and bioequivalence was determined with a linear mixed-effects model. RESULTS: In the preclinical study, no adverse events or significant local reactions were observed. The Cmax (45.8 ng/mL at 0.08 hour) with subcutaneous administration + rHuPH20 was 83% greater and was achieved 68% faster than with intramuscular administration (Cmax = 25 ng/mL at 0.25 hour). In the clinical study, a total of 12 subjects (7 women, 5 men; white majority; mean age, 44.8) were randomized. The majority of AEs were at the injection site, mild in severity, and transient. After subcutaneous administration of ondansetron + rHuPH20, geometric mean Cmax was 35% higher than with intramuscular ondansetron, 43% lower than with intravenous ondansetron, and 126% higher than with oral ondansetron (corrected for dose). Bioequivalence tests demonstrated that systemic exposure after subcutaneous administration was similar to that after intramuscular or intravenous administration and significantly greater than that after oral administration. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous ondansetron + rHuPH20 was generally well-tolerated. Subcutaneous dosing resulted in an extent of systemic exposure similar to that with intramuscular or intravenous dosing and greater than that with oral administration, and may be an option for clinical administration of ondansetron. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01572012.

Safety and tolerability of concurrent natalizumab treatment for patients with Crohn's disease not in remission while receiving infliximab.

BACKGROUND: Natalizumab, a humanized monoclonal IgG(4) antibody to alpha4 integrin, was investigated as a treatment of active Crohn's disease (CD). The safety of natalizumab given in combination with infliximab has not previously been studied. METHODS: Seventy-nine adult patients with active CD (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] score > or = 150) despite ongoing infliximab treatment were randomized 2:1 to receive 3 intravenous infusions of natalizumab (300 mg; n = 52) or placebo (n = 27) every 4 weeks. Patients received infliximab (5 mg/kg) every 8 weeks for at least 10 weeks before randomization and throughout the study. The primary objective was to assess the short-term safety and tolerability of natalizumab in patients concurrently receiving infliximab. Secondary and tertiary objectives included measures of efficacy, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and effects on inflammatory markers. A subset of patients also participated in a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis of the effects of concurrent treatment. RESULTS: Incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar in the treatment groups. AEs frequently reported in both groups were headache, CD exacerbation, nausea, and nasopharyngitis. No patient had a hypersensitivity-like reaction to natalizumab, whereas 4 patients (5%) experienced reactions to infliximab. Two patients (4%) developed anti-natalizumab antibodies; 10 patients (14%) developed anti-infliximab antibodies. The mean CDAI score decreased with natalizumab plus infliximab but was unchanged with infliximab alone (-37.7 versus +3.5; P = 0.084). Patients in both groups showed small increases in HRQoL (P = 0.811). No drug-drug interactions were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of natalizumab plus infliximab was well tolerated. Several positive trends suggested that treating patients not in remission with infliximab plus natalizumab had greater efficacy than treatment with infliximab alone.