Developing a Biorelevant Dissolution Method for an Extrudable Core System (ECS) Osmotic Tablet.

The objective of this work is to develop a biorelevant dissolution method to support the clinical study for In Vitro In Vivo Correlation (IVIVC) of the first commercially approved single-layer extrudable core system (ECS) osmotic tablet - the 11 mg tofacitinib modified-release tablet. The dissolution conditions were selected through analysis of experimental work including several designed experiments (DoE). The Apparatus 2 (paddles) was selected over the Apparatus 1 (baskets) to minimize the dissolution test variability. The paddle speed was kept at 50 rpm to be conservative and because higher paddle speed did not offer statistically significant improvement in dissolution test variability. The buffer of 50 mM potassium phosphate at pH 6.8 was selected over other buffers at lower or acid pH as the in vivo drug release is expected to occur in the small intestinal region, where the pH is approximately neutral. Finally, the statistically designed experiments proved that use of the Japanese basket sinkers was effective in reducing dissolution variability and eliminating the artificial shift in dissolution profile caused by final pink color-coated tablets sticking to the dissolution vessel. Discriminatory power of the method was verified and the method was validated per ICH and FDA guidelines. Since a Level A IVIVC is established from the analysis of the results of both in vivo clinical study and in vitro dissolution testing, the method is proven to be biorelevant. It also serves a suitable quality control dissolution method.

Sample preparation composite and replicate strategy case studies for assay of solid oral drug products.

Drug product assay is one of several tests required for new drug products to ensure the quality of the product at release and throughout the life cycle of the product. Drug product assay testing is typically performed by preparing a composite sample of multiple dosage units to obtain an assay value representative of the batch. In some cases replicate composite samples may be prepared and the reportable assay value is the average value of all the replicates. In previously published work by Harrington et al. (2014) [5], a sample preparation composite and replicate strategy for assay was developed to provide a systematic approach which accounts for variability due to the analytical method and dosage form with a standard error of the potency assay criteria based on compendia and regulatory requirements. In this work, this sample preparation composite and replicate strategy for assay is applied to several case studies to demonstrate the utility of this approach and its application at various stages of pharmaceutical drug product development.

Sample preparation composite and replicate strategy for assay of solid oral drug products.

In pharmaceutical analysis, the results of drug product assay testing are used to make decisions regarding the quality, efficacy, and stability of the drug product. In order to make sound risk-based decisions concerning drug product potency, an understanding of the uncertainty of the reportable assay value is required. Utilizing the most restrictive criteria in current regulatory documentation, a maximum variability attributed to method repeatability is defined for a drug product potency assay. A sampling strategy that reduces the repeatability component of the assay variability below this predefined maximum is demonstrated. The sampling strategy consists of determining the number of dosage units (k) to be prepared in a composite sample of which there may be a number of equivalent replicate (r) sample preparations. The variability, as measured by the standard error (SE), of a potency assay consists of several sources such as sample preparation and dosage unit variability. A sampling scheme that increases the number of sample preparations (r) and/or number of dosage units (k) per sample preparation will reduce the assay variability and thus decrease the uncertainty around decisions made concerning the potency of the drug product. A maximum allowable repeatability component of the standard error (SE) for the potency assay is derived using material in current regulatory documents. A table of solutions for the number of dosage units per sample preparation (r) and number of replicate sample preparations (k) is presented for any ratio of sample preparation and dosage unit variability.