Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 71(8): 2530-2538, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37026588

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The financial status of nursing homes (NHs) is a policy concern, especially during a pandemic, because of the higher costs associated with infection prevention and resident care. METHODS: This exploratory study was designed to assess the impact of the federal and state COVID-19 funding support on California NHs profitability during 2020, the first year of the pandemic, compared with 2019, the last pre-pandemic year. The study examined the association of Medicare and Medicaid days, related-party transactions, as well as other facility characteristics on net income profit margins, using cross-sectional regression analysis of data from state NH cost reports and federal NH provider data for 2019 and 2020. RESULTS: California skilled NHs had average reported net income profit margins of 2.26% in 2019 and 7.0% in 2020 with wide variations (from a loss of about 48% to a gain of 74% in 2020). Regression analysis found that the number of beds, occupancy rates, high-quality rating scores, and medium and high proportions of Medicare resident days were positively associated with net income margins in 2019 and 2020. Chains in 2020 (but not 2019), related-party expenditures in 2019 and 2020, median Medicaid days (in 2019), high Medicaid resident days (71%-73% or higher) in 2019 and 2020, and medium and high managed care resident days were negatively associated with net income margins in both years. CONCLUSIONS: Although NH admissions and occupancy rates declined substantially between 2019 and 2020, some (but not all) California NHs had a substantial increase in profit margins in 2020 over 2019. More studies of nursing home financial patterns and profitability are needed to examine trends over time and variations across states.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Medicare , Aged , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Pandemics , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Nursing Homes , Medicaid , California/epidemiology
2.
Policy Polit Nurs Pract ; 23(1): 15-25, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34939511

ABSTRACT

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spread rapidly worldwide. Nursing home (NH) residents are the most vulnerable high-risk population to infection. Professional registered nurses' (RNs') infection control is irreplaceable. We used a secondary data analysis method using the government's senior citizen welfare department large data set about all NHs (N = 3,389) across Korea between January 20 and October 20, 2020. Bed size positively associated with the mortality rate (No. of COVID-19 resident deaths / No. of total residents) (p = .048). When the proportion of RNs to total nursing staff was higher, the infection rate was 0.626% lower (p = .049), the mortality rate was 0.088% lower (p = .076), the proportion of confirmed COVID-19 cases per resident out of the total number of NHs was 44.472% lower (p = .041), and the proportion of confirmed COVID-19 deaths per resident out of the total number of NHs was 6.456% lower (p = .055). This study highlighted nurse staffing criteria and suggests that increasing RNs in NHs will reduce infection and mortality rates during the COVID-19 pandemic. We strongly suggest NHs hire at least one RN per day to properly function, and a minimum of four RNs to provide a fully competent RN workforce in long-term care settings in Korean NHs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Nursing Homes , Pandemics , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , SARS-CoV-2 , Workforce
3.
J Public Health Policy ; 23(1): 44-65, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12013715

ABSTRACT

The implementation of public long term care (LTC) insurance in 1995 in Germany is an important public policy development that offers lessons for the U.S. The German LTC model is comprehensive and mandatory, covering 88 percent of its population, by equal premium contributions on wages from employees and employers. The new German system has uniform eligibility and benefit criteria, covers both institutional and home care, pays for family caregivers, is financially solvent, and is considered a success by the public. In contrast, the U.S. financing of LTC is largely private, with the government serving as the safety net for the majority of the LTC costs after individuals spend down their resources. This paper considers whether a German-type LTC system is feasible and affordable and discusses the issues and complexities of public LTC insurance, including cost containment, home care services, quality control, and administrative structure.


Subject(s)
Insurance, Long-Term Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Models, Organizational , National Health Programs/economics , Universal Health Insurance/legislation & jurisprudence , Aged , Cost Control , Eligibility Determination , Feasibility Studies , Germany , Humans , Insurance, Long-Term Care/economics , National Health Programs/legislation & jurisprudence , Private Sector , Public Sector , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...