Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Food Prot ; 69(8): 1986-90, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16924929

ABSTRACT

A 1-year study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of Arcobacter spp. in raw milk and retail raw meats on sale in Northern Ireland. Retail raw poultry samples (n = 94), pork samples (n = 101), and beef samples (n = 108) were obtained from supermarkets in Northern Ireland, and raw milk samples (n = 101) were kindly provided by the Milk Research Laboratory, Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Belfast, Northern Ireland. Presumptive arcobacters were identified by previously described genus-specific and species-specific PCR assays. Arcobacter spp. were found to be common contaminants of retail raw meats and raw milk in Northern Ireland. Poultry meat (62%) had the highest prevalence, but frequent isolations were made from pork (35%), beef (34%), and raw milk (46%). Arcobacter butzleri was the predominant species isolated from retail raw meats and was the only species isolated from raw milk samples. Arcobacter cryaerophilus was detected less frequently, and Arcobacter skirrowii was detected only as a cocontaminant. To our knowledge, this is the first report of Arcobacter spp. prevalence in a diverse range of products of animal origin in Northern Ireland.


Subject(s)
Arcobacter/isolation & purification , Food Contamination/analysis , Food Microbiology , Meat/microbiology , Milk/microbiology , Animals , Cattle , Chickens , Colony Count, Microbial , Consumer Product Safety , Humans , Northern Ireland , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Prevalence , Species Specificity , Swine
2.
J Food Prot ; 67(4): 799-804, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15083734

ABSTRACT

Recent evidence suggests that arcobacters, especially Arcobacter butzleri, are potential foodborne pathogens, but standardized detection methods have yet to be established. A study was undertaken to determine which of three isolation methods was the most effective for the isolation of Arcobacter spp. from fresh raw poultry. Methods 1 was microaerobic and involved a membrane filtration step followed by plating onto blood agar. Method 2 was also microaerobic and involved enrichment and plating media containing a five-antibiotic cocktail. Method 3 was aerobic and was based on enrichment in a charcoal-based broth containing two antibiotics. Retail poultry samples (n = 50) were obtained from supermarkets in Northern Ireland; the European Community license number was recorded to ensure sample diversity. Presumptive arcobacters were identified using genus-specific and species-specific primers. Methods 1 resulted in the lowest recovery of arcobacters (28% of samples positive). The detection rate for method 2 (68%) was higher than that for method 3 (50%), but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). Modification of method 3 by plating the enrichment broth at 24 h, as well as at 48 h, increased recovery to 68%. Use of methods 2 and 3 together increased the number of positive samples detected by approximately 25% compared with use of either method alone. A. butzleri was the most commonly isolated species using all methods. Method 3 detected Arcobacter cryaerophilus in more samples (n = 3) than did method 1 and 2 (n = 1). Arcobacter skirrowii was detected by only method 3 (n = 1). In terms of sensitivity, ease of use, and diversity of species recovered, modified method 3 was the overall method of choice.


Subject(s)
Arcobacter/isolation & purification , Chickens/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial/methods , Food Microbiology , Animals , Consumer Product Safety , Food Contamination , Humans , Northern Ireland , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 69(12): 7523-6, 2003 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14660407

ABSTRACT

A polyphasic identification approach was used to investigate the taxonomic position of Campylobacter-like isolates recovered from barnacle geese (Branta leucopsis) and Canada geese (Branta candensis). Seven strains were selected from a collection of 21 isolates and analyzed by extensive phenotypic testing; four strains were characterized by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. The results clearly identified the bird isolates as Helicobacter canadensis, recently described as an emerging human pathogen. This is the first report of an animal reservoir for this organism and of its presence in Europe and confirms the zoonotic potential of H. canadensis.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases, Emerging/microbiology , Disease Reservoirs , Geese/microbiology , Helicobacter/classification , Zoonoses/microbiology , Animals , DNA, Ribosomal/analysis , Helicobacter/genetics , Helicobacter/isolation & purification , Helicobacter Infections/microbiology , Humans , Phenotype , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...