Accuracy of computed tomography in small bowel obstruction.

Small bowel obstruction is a common clinical occurrence, primarily caused by adhesions. The diagnosis is usually made on the clinical findings and the presence of dilated bowel loops on plain abdominal radiograph. Computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used to diagnose the cause and location of the obstruction to aid in the timing of surgical intervention. We used a retrospective chart review to identify patients with a diagnosis of small bowel obstruction between 2009 and 2012. We compared the findings on CT with the findings at operative intervention. Sixty patients had abdominal CT and subsequent surgical intervention. Eighty-three per cent of CTs were correct for small intestine involvement and 80 per cent for colon involvement. The presence of adhesions or perforation was correctly identified in 21 and 50 per cent, respectively. Sixty-four per cent correctly identified a transition point. The presence of a mass was correctly identified in 69 per cent. Twenty per cent of the patients who had ischemic small bowel at surgery were identified on CT. CT has a role in the clinical assessment of patients with small bowel obstruction, identifying with reasonable accuracy the extent of bowel involvement and the presence of masses and transition points. It is less reliable at identifying adhesions, perforations, or ischemic bowel.

Impact of hollow viscus injuries on outcome of abdominal gunshot wounds.

Abdominal gunshot wounds (GSW) are a source of morbidity and mortality. Limited data are available on the effect of hollow viscus injuries (HVI) secondary to gunshot wounds. GSW sustained in the Louisville area from 2004 to 2007 were reviewed. Attention was given to the impact of HVI from abdominal GSW. Statistical significance was determined. One-hundred ten patients sustained GSW with peritoneal violation. Eighty-six had HVI. Eighteen died after laparotomy with 15 having an HVI. Patients undergoing damage control (DC) have a significant increase in mortality compared with those not requiring DC. Exsanguination was the major cause of mortality (67%). Mortality directly related to HVI was found in 11 per cent. Twenty patients underwent DC with 11 deaths. Isolated HVI did not show a significantly increased mortality compared with other injury patterns involving solid organ or major vascular structures. Various methods of repair showed no significant survival advantage. Recognition and repair of HVI in abdominal GSW is crucial to patient salvage. Definitive repair of HVI at the initial operation should be considered. Primary repair of HVI is preferred although no survival disadvantage is seen in other forms of repair in marginally stable patients. Definitive repair at the initial operation decreases complications.

Enteral glutamine supplementation impairs intestinal blood flow in rats.

BACKGROUND: Clinical studies have shown that enteral immune-enhancing diets (IEDs) containing l-glutamine decrease septic complications and length of stay in some patient populations. Animal studies suggest IED benefits might include augmented gut blood flow. We hypothesized that enteral glutamine supplementation modulates gastrointestinal blood flow. METHODS: Blood flow was measured in male Sprague-Dawley rats via the colorimetric microsphere technique at baseline, 60, and 120 minutes. Four groups were studied: (1) control diet (CD) + enteral glutamine; (2) CD + enteral glycine; (3) CD + enteral saline; and (4) CD + intravenous glutamine. RESULTS: There were no differences in blood pressure or heart rate in any group. Group 1 blood flow was decreased at 120 minutes compared with controls (groups 2 and 3) in small intestine, colon, spleen, and pancreas, whereas the intravenous glutamine group (group 4) had no effect on blood flow. CONCLUSIONS: Enteral glutamine supplementation (as in IEDs) appears to impair gastrointestinal blood flow. Because glutamine provides energy directly to active enterocytes, enteral glutamine availability might diminish metabolic stimuli of absorptive hyperemia. This finding might partially explain the benefits observed with parenteral versus enteral glutamine supplementation in clinical studies (such as bone-marrow-transplant patients).