Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in Australia, 2002-2015.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the number of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) procedures in Australia by year, patient age and sex, and to estimate age group-specific population rates and the associated costs. Design, setting: Retrospective observational study; analysis of Australian National Hospital Morbidity Database hospital procedures data. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with an ICD insertion, replacement, adjustment, or removal procedure code, July 2002 - June 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of ICD procedures by procedure year, patient age (0-34, 35-69, 70 years or more) and sex; age group-specific population procedure rates; number of procedures associated with complications. RESULTS: The number of ICD procedures increased from 1844 in 2002-03 to 6504 in 2014-15; more than 75% of procedures were in men. In 2014-15, the ICD insertion rate for people aged 70 years or more was 78.1 per 100 000 population, 22 per 100 000 for those aged 35-69 years, and 1.40 per 100 000 people under 35. The reported complication rate decreased from 45% in 2002-03 to 19% in 2014-15, partly because of a change in the coding of complications. The number of removals corresponded to at least 4% of the number of insertions each year. The aggregate cost of hospitalisations with an ICD procedure during 2011-14 was $445 644 566. CONCLUSION: ICD procedures are becoming more frequent in Australia, particularly in people aged 70 or more. Patterns of care associated with ICD therapy, particularly patient- and hospital-related factors associated with adverse events, should be investigated to better understand and improve patient outcomes.

Cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation after an acute coronary event: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incremental effects on cost and quality of life of cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome. DESIGN: Open randomised controlled trial with 1 year's follow-up. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. SETTING: Two tertiary hospitals in Sydney. INTERVENTION: 18 sessions of comprehensive exercise-based outpatient cardiac rehabilitation or conventional care as provided by the treating doctor. PARTICIPANTS: 113 patients aged 41-75 years who were self-caring and literate in English. Patients with uncompensated heart failure, uncontrolled arrhythmias, severe and symptomatic aortic stenosis or physical impairment were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs (hospitalisations, medication use, outpatient visits, investigations, and personal expenses); and measures of quality of life. Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) saved at 1 year (this estimate combines within-study utility effects with reported 1-year risk of survival and treatment effects of rehabilitation on mortality). Sensitivity analyses around a base case estimate included alternative assumptions of no treatment effect on survival, 3 years of treatment effect on survival and variations in utility. RESULTS: The estimated incremental cost per QALY saved for rehabilitation relative to standard care was 42,535 US dollars when modelling included the reported treatment effect on survival. This increased to 70,580 US dollars per QALY saved if treatment effect on survival was not included. The results were sensitive to variations in utility and ranged from 19,685 US dollars per QALY saved to rehabilitation not being cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: The effects on quality of life tend to reinforce treatment advantages on survival for patients having postdischarge rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome. The estimated base case incremental cost per QALY saved is consistent with those historically accepted by decision making authorities such as the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee.

Effect of pravastatin compared with placebo initiated within 24 hours of onset of acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina: the Pravastatin in Acute Coronary Treatment (PACT) trial.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of statin drugs after an acute coronary event is now well established, but the evidence for statin use in the early treatment of acute coronary events remains unclear. METHODS: We tested the effects of administering pravastatin within 24 hours of the onset of symptoms in patients with unstable angina, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Patient recruitment of 10,000 with 1200 end points was planned, but the trial was stopped early. A total of 3408 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with pravastatin (1710 patients) or matching placebo (1698 patients). Treatment was continued for 4 weeks. The primary end point of the study was a composite of death, recurrence of myocardial infarction, or readmission to hospital for unstable angina within 30 days of random assignment. RESULTS: The primary end point occurred in 199 of patients allocated to pravastatin (11.6%) and in 211 patients allocated to placebo (12.4%). A relative risk reduction of 6.4% favored allocation to pravastatin but was not statistically significant (95% CI, -13.2% to 27.6%). No adverse effects were seen. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that 20 to 40 mg of pravastatin can be safely administered within 24 hours of the onset of symptoms of an acute coronary event, with a favorable but not significant trend in outcome at 30 days compared with placebo.