Frequency of discontinuation of injectable osteoporosis therapies in US patients over 2 years.

Little is known about treatment patterns with injectable osteoporosis therapies. At 12 months, the probability of discontinuation was 69.1% among patients using ibandronate, followed by teriparatide (67.1%), zoledronic acid (59.2%), and denosumab (48.8%). By 24 months, discontinuation was higher for each treatment. The majority of US patients discontinue injectable osteoporosis treatment by the end of the first year following initiation. INTRODUCTION: This study was designed to assess the frequency of treatment discontinuation over time among patients who initiate injectable osteoporosis therapies. METHODS: This retrospective observational study utilized an administrative claims database to measure discontinuation of injectable osteoporosis therapy, reported at 6-month intervals over 2 years. Eligible patients were aged ≥55 years, had newly initiated injectable osteoporosis therapy between January 2008 and June 2012, and were continuously enrolled in the health plan for ≥1 year prior to and ≥1.5 years after the date the first injectable medication was received (the index date). Follow-up time ranged from 18 to 24 months. Injectable osteoporosis treatments included in the analysis were denosumab, ibandronate, teriparatide, and zoledronic acid. Discontinuation was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and was defined at each time point as the percentage of patients who did not receive the dose scheduled for that time point. A 90-day grace period was allowed to accommodate flexibility in the scheduling of post-index re-administrations. Sensitivity analyses assessed discontinuation using grace periods of 60 and 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 4756 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study, with 617 utilizing denosumab, 233 ibandronate, 778 teriparatide, and 3128 zoledronic acid. At 12 months, discontinuation was highest among patients using ibandronate (69.1%), followed by teriparatide (67.1%), zoledronic acid (59.2%), and denosumab (48.8%). By 24 months, discontinuation was higher for each treatment: 87.5% for ibandronate, 87.9% for teriparatide, 79.8% for zoledronic acid, and 64.3% for denosumab. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of US patients discontinue injectable osteoporosis treatment by the end of the first year following initiation.

Vertebral Fractures: Clinical Importance and Management.

Vertebral fractures are common and can result in acute and chronic pain, decreases in quality of life, and diminished lifespan. The identification of vertebral fractures is important because they are robust predictors of future fractures. The majority of vertebral fractures do not come to clinical attention. Numerous modalities exist for visualizing suspected vertebral fracture. Although differing definitions of vertebral fracture may present challenges in comparing data between different investigations, at least 1 in 5 men and women aged >50 years have one or more vertebral fractures. There is clinical guidance to target spine imaging to individuals with a high probability of vertebral fracture. Radiology reports of vertebral fracture need to clearly state that the patient has a "fracture," with further pertinent details such as the number, recency, and severity of vertebral fracture, each of which is associated with risk of future fractures. Patients with vertebral fracture should be considered for antifracture therapy. Physical and pharmacologic modalities of pain control and exercises or physiotherapy to maintain spinal movement and strength are important components in the care of vertebral fracture patients.

The clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis: a position statement from the National Bone Health Alliance Working Group.

UNLABELLED: Osteoporosis causes an elevated fracture risk. We propose the continued use of T-scores as one means for diagnosis but recommend that, alternatively, hip fracture; osteopenia-associated vertebral, proximal humerus, pelvis, or some wrist fractures; or FRAX scores with ≥3% (hip) or 20% (major) 10-year fracture risk also confer an osteoporosis diagnosis. INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis is a common disorder of reduced bone strength that predisposes to an increased risk for fractures in older individuals. In the USA, the standard criterion for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and older men is a T-score of ≤ -2.5 at the lumbar spine, femur neck, or total hip by bone mineral density testing. METHODS: Under the direction of the National Bone Health Alliance, 17 clinicians and clinical scientists were appointed to a working group charged to determine the appropriate expansion of the criteria by which osteoporosis can be diagnosed. RESULTS: The group recommends that postmenopausal women and men aged 50 years should be diagnosed with osteoporosis if they have a demonstrable elevated risk for future fractures. This includes having a T-score of less than or equal to -2.5 at the spine or hip as one method for diagnosis but also permits a diagnosis for individuals in this population who have experienced a hip fracture with or without bone mineral density (BMD) testing and for those who have osteopenia by BMD who sustain a vertebral, proximal humeral, pelvic, or, in some cases, distal forearm fracture. Finally, the term osteoporosis should be used to diagnose individuals with an elevated fracture risk based on the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Algorithm, FRAX. CONCLUSIONS: As new ICD-10 codes become available, it is our hope that this new understanding of what osteoporosis represents will allow for an appropriate diagnosis when older individuals are recognized as being at an elevated risk for fracture.

Risk of fracture in women treated with monthly oral ibandronate or weekly bisphosphonates: the eValuation of IBandronate Efficacy (VIBE) database fracture study.

The eValuation of IBandronate Efficacy (VIBE) head-to-head database fracture study compared fracture rates between patients treated with monthly ibandronate and weekly oral bisphosphonates (BPs). This large study included women >/=45 years old, newly prescribed monthly oral ibandronate or weekly oral alendronate or risedronate, and without malignancy or Paget's disease of bone. The primary analysis included patients who were adherent to treatment during the first 90 days after the index date. The risks of hip, nonvertebral, vertebral and any clinical fracture were compared using Cox proportional hazards models and adjusted for potential confounding factors. A secondary, "intent-to-treat" analysis included all patients who received at least one BP prescription. Sensitivity analyses based on the primary analysis compared patients receiving ibandronate with patients receiving weekly alendronate or risedronate separately, and explored the effect of excluding patients with potential confounding factors from the analysis. Further sensitivity analyses varied the requirement for adherence during the first 90 days after the index date. The primary analysis population included 7345 monthly ibandronate and 56,837 weekly BP patients. Fracture rates after the 12-month observational period were <2% and fracture risk was not significantly different between patients receiving monthly ibandronate or weekly BPs for hip, nonvertebral or any clinical fracture (adjusted relative risk: hip=1.06, p=0.84; nonvertebral=0.88, p=0.255; any clinical fracture=0.82, p=0.052). Ibandronate patients had a significantly lower risk of vertebral fracture than weekly BP patients (adjusted relative risk 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.18-0.75, p=0.006). In the secondary, "intent-to-treat" analysis, relative risks of fracture were not significantly different between treatment groups for any fracture type. The results of the sensitivity analyses were generally consistent with the primary analysis. This retrospective cohort study found that patients treated with oral monthly ibandronate or weekly BPs (alendronate and risedronate) had similar, low risks of hip fracture, nonvertebral fracture and any clinical fracture. Ibandronate patients had a significantly lower relative risk of vertebral fracture than weekly BP patients; the clinical implications of these findings require further exploration and validation.

Two-year efficacy and tolerability of risedronate once a week for the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and tolerability of risedronate once-a-week dosing (35 and 50mg) were compared with risedronate daily dosing (5mg) in a 2-year study in women with osteoporosis. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, active-control study with lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) as the primary efficacy endpoint at 1 year. Subjects were women aged 50 years or older, postmenopausal for at least 5 years, and had either a BMD T-score of -2.5 or lower (lumbar spine or total proximal femur) or a T-score lower than -2 and at least one prevalent vertebral fracture. In addition to risedronate treatment, the subjects received 1000 mg daily of elemental calcium supplementation and received vitamin D if the baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) level was low. RESULTS: The results after 1 year of treatment were previously published. Of the 1456 women who were randomized and received study medication, 1127 (77%) completed the 2-year study. Over the 2 years of treatment, the incidence of both new vertebral fractures (2.9, 1.5, and 1.7% for the 5, 35, and 50 mg groups, respectively; for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis who p = 0.298) and osteoporosis-related non-vertebral fractures reported as adverse events (5.0, 4.9, and 4.5% for the 5, 35, and 50 mg groups, respectively; p = 0.918) was similar for all 3 treatment groups. The reduction from baseline at Month 24 in bone turnover markers was similar based on an analysis of variance for the 5 mg daily and the 35 mg once-a-week groups. The mean percentage change in lumbar spine BMD after 24 months was 5.17, 4.74, and 5.47% for the 5, 35, and 50 mg groups, respectively. Both the 35 and 50 mg once-a-week treatment groups met the pre-specified criterion of non-inferiority to the 5 mg daily treatment group. No apparent difference in the pattern or distribution of serious and upper gastrointestinal adverse events was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year data agree with the 1-year results demonstrating that the risedronate once-a-week doses are comparable in efficacy and safety to the 5 mg daily dose. Risedronate 35 mg once a week is considered the optimal dose want a once-a-week dosing regimen.

In vivo assessment of architecture and micro-finite element analysis derived indices of mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the radius.

Measurement of microstructural parameters of trabecular bone noninvasively in vivo is possible with high-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. These measurements may prove useful in the determination of bone strength and fracture risk, but must be related to other measures of bone properties. In this study in vivo MR imaging was used to derive trabecular bone structure measures and combined with micro-finite element analysis (microFE) to determine the effects of trabecular bone microarchitecture on bone mechanical properties in the distal radius. The subjects were studied in two groups: (I) postmenopausal women with normal bone mineral density (BMD) (n = 22, mean age 58 +/- 7 years) and (II) postmenopausal women with spine or femur BMD -1 SD to -2.5 SD below young normal (n = 37, mean age 62 +/- 11 years). MR images of the distal radius were obtained at 1.5 T, and measures such as apparent trabecular bone volume fraction (App BV/TV), spacing, number and thickness (App TbSp, TbN, TbTh) were derived in regions of interest extending from the joint line to the radial shaft. The high-resolution images were also used in a micro-finite element model to derive the directional Young's moduli (E1, E2 and E3), shear moduli (G12, G23 and G13) and anisotropy ratios such as E1/E3. BMD at the distal radius, lumbar spine and hip were assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Bone formation was assessed by serum osteocalcin and bone resorption by serum type I collagen C-terminal telopeptide breakdown products (serum CTX) and urinary CTX biochemical markers. The trabecular architecture displayed considerable anisotropy. Measures of BMD such as the ultradistal radial BMD were lower in the osteopenic group (p<0.01). Biochemical markers between the two groups were comparable in value and showed no significant difference between the two groups. App BV/TV, TbTh and TbN were higher, and App TbSp lower, in the normal group than the osteopenic group. All three directional measures of elastic and shear moduli were lower in the osteopenic group compared with the normal group. Anisotropy of trabecular bone microarchitecture, as measured by the ratios of the mean intercept length (MIL) values (MIL1/MIL3, etc.), and the anisotropy in elastic modulus (E1/E3, etc.), were greater in the osteopenic group compared with the normal group. The correlations between the measures of architecture and moduli are higher than those between elastic moduli and BMD. Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that while App BV/TV is highly correlated with the mechanical properties, additional structural measures do contribute to the improved prediction of the mechanical measures. This study demonstrates the feasibility and potential of using MR imaging with microFE modeling in vivo in the study of osteoporosis.

Treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.

Vertebral fracture is the most common complication of osteoporosis. It results in significant mortality and morbidity, including prolonged and intractable pain in a minority of patients. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, procedures that involve percutaneous injection of bone cement into a collapsed vertebra, have recently been introduced for treatment of osteoporotic patients who have prolonged pain (several weeks or longer) following vertebral fracture. To determine the details of the procedures and to gather information on their safety and efficacy, we performed a MEDLINE search using the terms 'vertebroplasty' and 'kyphoplasty.' We reviewed reports of these procedures in patients with osteoporosis. We supplemented the articles found with other papers known to the authors and with presentations at national meetings. Randomized trials of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty have not been reported. Case reports suggest that these procedures are associated with pain relief in 67% to 100% of cases. Short-term complications, mainly the result of extravasation of cement, include increased pain and damage from heat or pressure to the spinal cord or nerve roots. Proper patient selection and good technique should minimize complications, but rarely, decompressive surgery is needed. Long-term benefits have not yet been shown, but potentially include prevention of recurrent pain at the treated level(s) with both procedures, and, with kyphoplasty, reversal of height loss and spinal deformity, an improved level of function, and avoidance of chronic pain and restriction of internal organs. Possible long-term complications, again not fully evaluated, include local acceleration of bone resorption caused by the treatment itself or by foreign-body reaction at the cement-bone interface, and increased risk of fracture in treated or adjacent vertebrae through changes in mechanical forces. Controlled trials are needed to determine both short-term and long-term safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Both procedures may be useful for osteoporotic patients who have prolonged pain following acute vertebral fracture. Until there is conclusive evidence for efficacy and long-term safety, these procedures should be done only in carefully selected patients, only by experienced operators with appropriate high-quality imaging equipment, and ideally at centers that are participating in controlled trials.

Effect of combined risedronate and hormone replacement therapies on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.

Both hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and bisphosphonates are efficacious in the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Combined therapy with bisphosphonate and HRT is likely to be used in clinical practice, and limited data are available regarding its efficacy and safety. This was a 1-yr, double blind, placebo-controlled study in which 524 postmenopausal women received daily treatment with conjugated equine estrogens (0.625 mg) alone or in combination with risedronate (5 mg). Women who had not undergone hysterectomy received medroxyprogesterone acetate (up to 5 mg, daily or cyclically) at the discretion of the investigator. The primary efficacy end point was the percent change from baseline in mean lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) at 1 yr. Changes in BMD at the proximal femur and forearm, bone turnover markers, and histology and histomorphometry were also assessed. At 12 months, significant (P < 0.05) increases from baseline in lumbar spine BMD were observed in both treatment groups (HRT-only, 4.6%; combined risedronate-HRT, 5.2%); the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Both therapies led to significant increases in BMD at 12 months at the femoral neck (1.8% and 2.7%, respectively), femoral trochanter (3.2% and 3.7%), distal radius (1.7% and 1.6%), and midshaft radius (0.4% and 0.7%). The differences between groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05) at the femoral neck and midshaft radius. Both combined risedronate-HRT and HRT-only produced significant decreases in the biochemical markers of bone turnover, with somewhat greater decreases in the combined treatment group. Bone biopsy data showed normal bone structure and normal mineralization with either treatment. Expected decreases in bone turnover were observed and were greater in the combined treatment group (68-79% reduction relative to baseline values, P < 0.005). Overall, combined treatment had a safety profile similar to that of HRT-only, including bone and gastrointestinal safety profiles. In conclusion, the combined treatment with risedronate and HRT had a favorable effect on BMD similar to that of HRT alone at the lumbar spine and slightly, but significantly, greater than that of HRT alone at the femoral neck and midshaft radius. The combined treatment was well tolerated, and there were no adverse effects on the skeleton.

Bisphosphonates for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: clinical studies of etidronate and alendronate.

Several large, prospective, controlled trials have demonstrated that bisphosphonates such as etidronate and alendronate are effective and generally safe for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The results of these trials show a remarkable degree of consistency and indicate that long-term bisphosphonate therapy significantly increases BMD of the spine and of other skeletal sites, reduces the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures, and generally is safe and well tolerated by patients. Data supporting the use of risedronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis are presented in an accompanying article.

Bisphosphonates: safety and efficacy in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis.

Osteoporosis affects more than 28 million Americans. With the advent of accessible and affordable diagnostic studies, awareness and recognition of this disease by patients and clinicians are growing. Osteoporotic fractures of the spine and hip are costly and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Over the past decade, a surge of new antiosteoporotic drugs have been labeled or are awaiting labeling by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. One class of agents used to treat osteoporosis is the bisphosphonates, which inhibit bone resorption, cause an increase in bone mineral density and reduce the risk of future fractures caused by aging, estrogen deficiency and corticosteroid use. Overall, bisphosphonates have been shown to have a strong safety and tolerability profile.

Effects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Vertebral Efficacy With Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Study Group.

CONTEXT: Risedronate, a potent bisphosphonate, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of Paget disease of bone and other metabolic bone diseases but, to our knowledge, it has not been evaluated in the treatment of established postmenopausal osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy and safety of daily treatment with risedronate to reduce the risk of vertebral and other fractures in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 2458 ambulatory postmenopausal women younger than 85 years with at least 1 vertebral fracture at baseline who were enrolled at 1 of 110 centers in North America conducted between December 1993 and January 1998. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomly assigned to receive oral treatment for 3 years with risedronate (2.5 or 5 mg/d) or placebo. All subjects received calcium, 1000 mg/d. Vitamin D (cholecalciferol, up to 500 IU/d) was provided if baseline levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D were low. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of new vertebral fractures as detected by quantitative and semiquantitative assessments of radiographs; incidence of radiographically confirmed nonvertebral fractures and change from baseline in bone mineral density as determined by dual x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: The 2.5 mg/d of risedronate arm was discontinued after 1 year; in the placebo and 5 mg/d of risedronate arms, 450 and 489 subjects, respectively, completed all 3 years of the trial. Treatment with 5 mg/d of risedronate, compared with placebo, decreased the cumulative incidence of new vertebral fractures by 41 % (95% confidence interval [CI], 18%-58%) over 3 years (11.3 % vs 16.3%; P= .003). A fracture reduction of 65% (95% CI, 38%-81 %) was observed after the first year (2.4% vs 6.4%; P<.001). The cumulative incidence of nonvertebral fractures over 3 years was reduced by 39% (95% CI, 6%-61 %) (5.2 % vs 8.4%; P = .02). Bone mineral density increased significantly compared with placebo at the lumbar spine (5.4% vs 1.1 %), femoral neck (1.6% vs -1.2%), femoral trochanter (3.3% vs -0.7%), and midshaft of the radius (0.2% vs -1.4%). Bone formed during risedronate treatment was histologically normal. The overall safety profile of risedronate, including gastrointestinal safety, was similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that risedronate therapy is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Addition of alendronate to ongoing hormone replacement therapy in the treatment of osteoporosis: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Alendronate and estrogen are effective therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis, but their efficacy and safety as combined therapy are unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the addition of alendronate to ongoing hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. A total of 428 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, who had been receiving HRT for at least 1 yr, were randomized to receive either alendronate (10 mg/day) or placebo. HRT was continued in both groups. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover were assessed. Compared with HRT alone, at 12 months, alendronate plus HRT produced significantly greater increases in BMD of the lumbar spine (3.6% vs. 1.0%, P < 0.001) and hip trochanter (2.7% vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001); however, the between-group difference in BMD at the femoral neck was not significant (1.7% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.072). Biochemical markers of bone turnover (serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and urine N-telopeptide) decreased significantly at 6 and 12 months with alendronate plus HRT, and they remained within premenopausal levels. Addition of alendronate to ongoing HRT was generally well tolerated, with no significant between-group differences in upper gastrointestinal adverse events or fractures. This study demonstrated that, in postmenopausal women with low bone density despite ongoing treatment with estrogen, alendronate added to HRT significantly increased bone mass at both spine and hip trochanter and was generally well tolerated.

Assessment of vertebral bone mineral density using volumetric quantitative CT.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to determine the precision and diagnostic efficacy of bone mineral density (BMD) measures based on volumetric quantitative CT (QCT) of the spine. METHOD: Volumetric CT scans of L1 and L2 (GE-9800Q; 80 kVp, 140 mAs, 3 mm slices) were acquired in a cohort of 62 osteoporotic women (mean age 70.4 years, T(DXA hip or spine) < -2.5), of whom 20 had vertebral fractures and 42 were nonfractured control subjects. An image analysis technique delineated trabecular, cortical, and integral regions in reference to a vertebra-fixed coordinate system. We computed precision values and fracture control differences for these new regions and for single-slice QCT and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures synthesized from the volumetric data. RESULTS: Volumetric trabecular BMD showed higher precision (1.3%) than the synthesized single-slice measures (2.1-2.8%). Volumetric and single-slice trabecular BMD showed equivalent decrements between fractured and nonfractured subjects (17-19%), with integral BMD showing smaller and less significant differences (7-8%). CONCLUSION: Volumetric and single-slice QCT techniques are equivalent for vertebral fracture risk estimation, but volumetric techniques should be superior for monitoring therapy efficacy.

Hot-Pack and 1-MHz Ultrasound Treatments Have an Additive Effect on Muscle Temperature Increase.

OBJECTIVE: Therapeutic ultrasound is an effective deep heating modality commonly applied alone or after cooling or heating of the treatment area. The purpose of this study was to examine the tissue temperature rise in the human triceps surae muscle group after ultrasound with prior heating via a silicate gel hot pack. DESIGN AND SETTING: This study was designed as a 2 x 2 x 3 factorial with repeated measures on two factors (depth and time). Independent variables were temperature of pack (hot and room temperature), depth of measurement (1 cm and 3 cm), and time (beginning, after pack application, and after ultrasound). The dependent variable was tissue temperature. Subjects were assigned to one of two treatment groups: ultrasound preceded by a 15-minute hot pack treatment or ultrasound preceded by a 15-minute application with a silicate gel pack at room temperature. Measurements were taken while subjects were treated in a university training room. SUBJECTS: Twenty-one uninjured male and female college student volunteers were randomly assigned to one of the two pack groups. MEASUREMENTS: The hot packs were stored in 75 degrees C water. A 1-MHz ultrasound treatment was administered for 10 minutes at an intensity of 1.5 W/cm(2). Tissue temperature was measured every 30 seconds using 23-gauge hypodermic microprobes interfaced with a telethermometer and inserted 1 and 3 cm below the surface of anesthetized triceps surae muscle. RESULTS: At both tissue depths, there was a 0.8 degrees C greater increase in tissue temperature with hot packs and ultrasound. At 1 cm, ultrasound increased temperature 3.5 degrees C after a 0.5 degrees C rise during the room temperature-pack application, but only 0.6 degrees C after a 3.8 degrees C increase during hot-pack application. At 3 cm, ultrasound increased temperature 3.85 degrees C following a slight (-0.26 degrees C) decrease during the room temperature-pack application and 3.68 degrees C after a 0.74 degrees C increase during hot-pack application. CONCLUSIONS: Vigorous increases in deep muscle temperature (>/=4 degrees C) can be reached with 2 to 3 minutes less total sonation time when preheated with a hot pack. Thus, ultrasound and hot packs have an additive effect on intramuscular temperature, but the characteristics of the additive effect are different, primarily because there appears to be a tissue temperature plateau.

Increments in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and hip and suppression of bone turnover are maintained after discontinuation of alendronate in postmenopausal women.

PURPOSE: Previously we have reported a significant increase in bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and the hip and reductions in biochemical indices of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with alendronate at various doses over 1 to 2 years. We have followed BMD and biochemical parameters in these patients for 1 or 2 years after discontinuation of alendronate to determine resolution of alendronate effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants received daily oral doses of placebo, 5 or 10 mg of alendronate for 2 years, or 20 or 40 mg of alendronate for 1 year followed by 1 year of placebo. No treatment was given in the third year of study. RESULTS: Lumbar spine BMD changes in the 5- and 10-mg groups (-1.4 and -0.4%) were similar to those in the placebo group (-1.2%) 1 year after discontinuation of drug and lumbar spine BMD changes in the 20- and 40-mg groups (-1.2% and 0.8%) were similar to those in the placebo group (-0.9%) 2 years after discontinuation of drug. BMD of the total hip followed the same pattern of resolution. The difference in BMD between alendronate and placebo groups at the end of alendronate treatment was maintained up to 2 years. Residual reductions in the bone resorption markers urinary deoxypyridinoline (D-Pyr) and collagen type 1 cross-linked N telopeptides and the bone formation markers serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin remained for 1 year after discontinuation of 5 and 10 mg of alendronate and for 2 years after discontinuation of 20 and 40 mg of alendronate, other than return of D-Pyr to baseline 1 year after cessation of treatment with the 5- and 10-mg doses. CONCLUSIONS: A residual decrease in bone turnover may be found up to 2 years after discontinuation of alendronate. Accelerated bone loss is not observed when treatment is discontinued. However, continuous therapy with alendronate is required to achieve a continuous gain in BMD.

Prevention of nonvertebral fractures by alendronate. A meta-analysis. Alendronate Osteoporosis Treatment Study Groups.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of treatment with alendronate sodium, a potent aminobisphosphonate, on the incidence of nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. DATA SOURCES: Published data and data on file at Merck Research Laboratories. STUDY SELECTION: All completed prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled alendronate trials of at least 2 years' duration (5 studies). DATA EXTRACTION: All subjects were women with osteoporosis between the ages of 42 and 85 years, postmenopausal at least 4 years, with lumbar spine bone mineral density (measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) at least 2.0 SD below the mean for young adult women. All women randomized to treatment with placebo or alendronate at a dose higher than 1 mg per day for at least 2 years were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: In the placebo group (n=590), 60 women reported nonvertebral fractures during 1347 patient-years at risk (overall rate, 4.45 women with fractures per 100 patient-years at risk). In the alendronate group (n = 1012), 73 women reported nonvertebral fractures during 2240 patient-years-at risk (overall rate, 3.26 women with fractures per 100 patient-years at risk). The estimated cumulative incidence of nonvertebral fractures after 3 years was 12.6% in the placebo group and 9.0% in alendronate group. The relative risk for nonvertebral fracture estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model was 0.71 (95% confidence interval,0.502-0.997) (P=.048). A reduction in risk was consistent across each of the studies and at each major site of osteoporotic fracture, including the hip and wrist. CONCLUSION: In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, treatment with alendronate reduces the risk of nonvertebral fractures over at least 3 years.

Dose-response relationships for alendronate treatment in osteoporotic elderly women. Alendronate Elderly Osteoporosis Study Centers.

Alendronate (ALN) is an aminobisphosphonate employed as an antiresorptive agent in the treatment of osteoporosis. The present study was carried out to determine dose-response relationships, particularly the effects of relatively low doses of ALN, on bone mineral density (BMD), biochemical indexes of bone and mineral metabolism, and bone histology, with particular attention to effects in elderly women. This prospective, randomized, double blind, 2-yr multicenter study compared the effects of placebo with those of 1.0, 2.5, or 5.0 mg ALN daily. All subjects received supplemental calcium (500 mg daily) as the carbonate. We studied 359 women with lumbar spine BMD at least 2.0 SD below the peak young adult mean. Subjects were stratified by age, with 135 aged 60-69 yr and 224 aged 70-85 yr. Histomorphometry was performed on transiliac bone biopsies obtained from 104 subjects after 1 yr and from 83 subjects after 2 yr. This study elucidated the previously uninvestigated lower region of the dose-response curve for ALN in osteoporosis. Over 2 yr, treatment with 1.0, 2.5, or 5.0 mg/day increased lumbar spine BMD, on the average, by 0.65%, 3.54%, and 5.67%, respectively, compared with that in the placebo group (P < 0.001 vs. placebo for the 2.5 and 5 mg groups). Significant dose-related increases were also seen in BMD at appendicular sites and in total body BMD. Dose-dependent reductions in bone turnover to new steady states were indicated by serum and urine biochemical markers as well as by histomorphometry. There was also a dose-related reduction in the proportion of subjects suffering nonvertebral fractures (P < 0.05). Safety profiles were similar for the ALN and placebo groups and for both age strata. Efficacy was similar for both age strata. There was no evidence of impaired mineralization or other histological abnormalities due to ALN treatment. We conclude that treatment with ALN over a period of 2 yr was well tolerated and produced dose-dependent increases in BMD without evidence of a plateau over the dose range of 1.0-5.0 mg daily. One milligram daily did not result in a significant effect on BMD, and 5.0 mg daily produced favorable effects at all sites measured. Other studies have demonstrated somewhat greater effects on 10 mg daily. ALN, was equally effective and well tolerated in osteoporotic women over 70 yr old as in younger women with the same condition.

Cyclical etidronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: efficacy and safety after seven years of treatment.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of cyclical etidronate for up to 7 years in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and to examine the effects of discontinuing treatment after 2 or 5 years of therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized at entry into the original study in 1986 to blinded treatment for 2 years with either a calcium (placebo) or an intermittent cyclical etidronate regimen, which most patients continued for a third year. Following this phase of the study, patients were enrolled into an open-label, follow-up study (years 4 and 5), during which all patients received cyclical etidronate treatment. In the present double-blind study (years 6 and 7), patients were rerandomized to receive intermittent cyclical therapy with either etidronate or placebo; all patients received calcium. The treatment regimen consisted of 400 mg/day etidronate or placebo for 14 days, followed by 76 days of elemental calcium (500 mg/day); this cycle was repeated approximately 4 times in each year. Of the 193 patients who continued in years 6 and 7 of the study, 93 were randomized to receive cyclical etidronate and 100 were randomized to receive calcium only. For purposes of efficacy analyses, patients were categorized by their total years of cumulative etidronate treatment (7, 5, 4, or 2 years). There were 51, 46, 42, and 54 patients in the 7-, 5-, 4-, and 2-year groups, respectively. Annual assessments included lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), as measured by densitometry, and vertebral radiographs. RESULTS: The groups receiving cyclical etidronate during this 2-year study period (7- and 4-year groups) had statistically significant mean percent increases in spinal BMD of 1.8% and 2.2%, respectively (P < 0.05) at the week 104 observation time. The 5- and 2-year groups, which did not receive etidronate during this period, had mean values of 1.4% and 0.2%, respectively (not significant) at week 104. In the 7-, 5-, 4-, and 2-year groups, the increases in spinal BMD at the end of 7 years were 7.6%, 8.6%, 8.1%, and 3.9%, respectively; these values were statistically significant for all groups compared with original baseline (year 0) (P < 0.05). BMD of the femur and wrist was maintained throughout the 7-year period. The incidence and rate of vertebral fractures were lowest in patients with the longest exposure to etidronate. Etidronate was well tolerated during the study, with low incidences of gastrointestinal side effects and nonvertebral fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term cyclical etidronate is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bone mass is maintained for at least 2 years after treatment with etidronate is stopped; however, further gains in spinal bone mass are seen in patients who continue therapy.