Can the LACE index help identify uninsured patients at risk of loss to follow-up during a pharmacist-led transitions of care program?

BACKGROUND: Uninsured patients are susceptible to being lost to follow-up (LTFU). In addition to being uninsured, follow-up is especially critical among this population during transitions of care when patients are discharged from the hospital setting back to home because follow-up care after discharge has been proven to prevent readmissions. The LACE tool has historically been used to predict readmissions, but the LACE tool has not been used to evaluate patients' risk of LTFU. OBJECTIVE: To understand the potential translation of the LACE tool for use in uninsured patients' follow-up care, we assessed the association between LACE index scores and patients' risk of LTFU during a pharmacist-led transitions of care program for uninsured patients. METHODS: Data were extracted from a randomized controlled trial implementing a pharmacist-led transitions of care program at an indigent care clinic. The study population included uninsured adult patients (>18 years old) who spoke English and attended a clinical visit with a pharmacist within 16 days after discharge from a community hospital. Analyses sought to determine factors associated with the patients' LTFU status. RESULTS: Among 88 enrolled participants, 29 participants (32.95%) were LTFU. Thirty-two patients (36.4%) had a high LACE index score at baseline, indicating an increased risk of 30-day readmission. Of the remaining 56 patients (63.6%) with low-to-moderate LACE index scores, 54 (61.4%) had a moderate LACE index score, and only 2 (2.3%) had a low LACE index score. Uninsured patients with high LACE index scores had 70% lower odds of being LTFU than uninsured patients with low-to-moderate LACE index scores (exact odds ratio 0.297 [95% CI 0.081-0.947]). CONCLUSION: The LACE index score was inversely related to the risk of LTFU during a pharmacist-led transitions of care program. Pharmacists may use the LACE tool to identify patients at high risk of LTFU.

What Are the Risk Factors for an Upper Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis After Orthopaedic Irrigation and Debridement and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement?

BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement is necessary for delivery of intravenous (IV) antibiotics to treat bone and soft tissue infections. Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) after PICC placement is a complication with unknown incidence in the orthopaedic literature. The major objectives of this study are Identifying the rate of upper extremity PICC-associated DVTs after orthopaedic procedures;Which orthopaedic subspecialties are most likely to encounter an upper extremity PICC-associated DVT?What surgeries or medical comorbidities are risk factors for upper extremity PICC-associated DVTs?Does type of DVT chemoprophylaxis decrease the risk of an upper extremity PICC-associated DVT? METHODS: A retrospective review of electronic medical records (EMR) was performed to include all patients undergoing irrigation and debridement (I&D) for treatment of orthopaedic surgery-related infections over a 10-year period. All patients with PICC placement were included for analyses. Age, sex, and medical comorbidities were extracted from the EMR. Mann-Whitney non-parametric tests, Fisher's exact tests, Chi-square tests, and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) tests were used to determine associations with DVT events for those with PICCs based on medical comorbidities, PICC lumen size, team placing the PICC, impact of implant removal, and protective effect of DVT chemoprophylaxis. Significance was set at p<0.05. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 660 patients (3.18% rate) were found to have an upper extremity PICC-associated DVT. A history of DVT (OR=8.99 [95% CI: 3.39, 49.42]) was significantly associated with an upper extremity PICC-associated DVT. The greatest risk for an upper extremity PICC-associated DVT was intramedullary implant removal (OR=12.43 [95% CI: 3.13, 49.52]). The type of DVT chemoprophylaxis did not significantly affect the likelihood of an upper extremity PICC-associated DVT. CONCLUSION: Intramedullary implant removal and a history of DVT are risk factors for an upper extremity PICC-associated DVT. The results of this study should be of particular interest to surgeons who do not typically give DVT prophylaxis and plan to perform surgery on patients with CHF, a history of a DVT, or plan to manipulate the intramedullary canal.

Implementation of a pharmacist-led transitions of care program in an indigent care clinic: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Pharmacists' involvement in the transitions of care has shown the potential to decrease readmissions and increase access to care in many populations; however, the uninsured patient populations have not been studied. The evidence for the feasibility of implementing transitions of care services in indigent care clinics with limited resources also remains limited. The objectives were to implement a pharmacist-led transitions of care program in an indigent care clinic, to demonstrate the feasibility of its implementation, and to evaluate its impact on readmissions and emergency department (ED) visit rates among an uninsured population. METHODS: The study was a single-blind, parallel, randomized controlled trial implemented in an indigent care clinic in the Southeast region of the United States from October 2018 to July 2019. Eligible patients were those older than 18 years, uninsured, English-speaking, diagnosed with any condition, and recently discharged from a local community hospital within the past 16 days. The primary outcome was the hospital readmission rate at 30 days after discharge. The secondary outcomes included 60- and 90-day readmission rates in addition to 30-, 60-, and 90-day ED visit rates. RESULTS: A total of 88 participants were recruited. The intervention was successfully implemented in the clinic, but patient-level barriers to follow-ups included transportation, accessibility, financial burdens, inconsistent telephone communication, and a lack of knowledge about the importance of follow-ups. At 30 days postdischarge, 13.64% of the patients in the usual care group experienced readmissions compared with 9.30% of the patients in the intervention group. The relative change in the 30-day readmission rates between the usual care and the intervention groups was 1.7 (rate ratio [RR] 1.69 [95% CI 0.47-6.08]). The RRs were insignificant for the 30-, 60-, and 90-day readmission and ED visit rates. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the feasibility of implementing transitions of care services in a clinic with limited resources by pharmacists. The intervention showed promising results by reducing readmission rates.