Relationship between functional assessments and exercise-related changes during static balance.

The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is currently used for injury risk prediction, although researchers have not studied its relationships to injury risk factors. The purpose of this study was to compare FMS scores at rest to changes in static balance after exercise. Second, we examined FMS scores pre and post exercise. Twenty-five participants performed center of pressure (COP) measures and FMS testing. An acclimatization session for the FMS occurred on day 1, whereas day 2 involved COP measures for static balance and FMS testing before and after a 36-minute exercise protocol. Center of pressure standard deviations in the frontal (COPML-SD) and sagittal (COPAP-SD) planes, center of pressure velocity (COP-Velocity), center of pressure area (COP-Area), and FMS scores were recorded. No significant correlations occurred between preexercise FMS scores and change in COP measures. Preexercise hurdle step scores related to preexercise COPML-SD (p = -0.46), COPAP-SD (p = -0.43), and COP-Area (p = -0.50). Preexercise in-line lunge scores related to postexercise COPAP-SD (p = -0.44) and COP-Velocity (p = -0.39), whereas preexercise active straight leg raise (ASLR) scores related to postexercise COPML-SD (p = -0.46). Functional Movement Screen scores were not related to changes in static balance after exercise and may therefore not be useful to predict who will experience greater static balance deficits after exercise. Additionally, FMS scores did not differ before and after exercise. Clinicians aiming to identify injury risk from a general static balance standpoint may find the hurdle step, in-line lunge, and ASLR useful. Clinicians aiming to identify injury risk from a change in static balance standpoint may need to explore other screening tools.

Sagittal plane kinematics during the transition run in triathletes.

OBJECTIVES: Epidemiological evidence indicates more than 70% of all injuries that occur while training for or competing in triathlon happen during running. Maintaining an aerodynamic position on a bicycle during a triathlon places triathletes in a prolonged trunk flexed position which may affect lower extremity running biomechanics following cycling and influence both injury risk and performance in these athletes. The aim of this study was to compare sagittal plane running kinematics after a 30-min cycling protocol to a baseline run without prior exercise. DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Healthy participants with prior triathlon experience (n=28; height=1.73±0.09m; mass=63.0±7.7kg; age=24.6±5.8years) ran at a self-selected speed on a custom-built treadmill surrounded by a 12-camera motion analysis system before and after a 30-min cycling protocol (RPE 12-14). Three-dimensional kinematics were measured before, and at 2-min, 6-min, 10-min, and 14-min post-cycling. A 1×5 series of repeated measures univariate ANOVAs were used to determine changes in kinematic parameters resulting from the cycling protocol. Statistical significance was set a priori at (p<0.05). RESULTS: Peak angles for anterior pelvic tilt (p<0.001), hip flexion (p<0.001), and spine extension (p<0.001) increased and hip extension decreased (p<0.001) at all time points while running following cycling compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Cycling in an aerodynamic position for 30min induces changes in sagittal plane running kinematics of the spine, pelvis, and hip for at least 14min following cycling. Alterations in kinematics may increase the risk for lower extremity injuries and affect running performance in triathletes.