Mechanisms of Exercise Intolerance Across the Breast Cancer Continuum: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of abnormal cardiopulmonary responses to exercise and pathophysiological mechanism(s) underpinning exercise intolerance across the continuum of breast cancer (BC) care from diagnosis to metastatic disease. METHODS: Individual participant data from four randomized trials spanning the BC continuum ([1] prechemotherapy [n = 146], [2] immediately postchemotherapy [n = 48], [3] survivorship [n = 138], and [4] metastatic [n = 47]) were pooled and compared with women at high-risk of BC (BC risk; n = 64). Identical treadmill-based peak cardiopulmonary exercise testing protocols evaluated exercise intolerance (peak oxygen consumption; V̇O2peak) and other resting, submaximal, and peak cardiopulmonary responses. The prevalence of 12 abnormal exercise responses was evaluated. Graphical plots of exercise responses were used to identify oxygen delivery and/or uptake mechanisms contributing to exercise intolerance. Unsupervised, hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted to explore exercise response phenogroups. RESULTS: Mean V̇O2peak was 2.78 ml O2.kg-1·min-1 (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.94, -1.62 mL O2.kg-1·min-1; P < 0.001) lower in the pooled BC cohort (52 ± 11 yr) than BC risk (55 ± 10 yr). Compared with BC risk, the pooled BC cohort had a 2.5-fold increased risk of any abnormal cardiopulmonary response (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2, 5.3; P = 0.014). Distinct exercise responses in BC reflected impaired oxygen delivery and uptake relative to control, although considerable inter-individual heterogeneity within cohorts was observed. In unsupervised, hierarchical cluster analysis, six phenogroups were identified with marked differences in cardiopulmonary response patterns and unique clinical characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal cardiopulmonary response to exercise is common in BC and is related to impairments in oxygen delivery and uptake. The identification of exercise response phenogroups could help improve cardiovascular risk stratification and guide investigation of targeted exercise interventions.

Effects and tolerability of exercise therapy modality on cardiorespiratory fitness in lung cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Poor cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a cardinal feature of post-treatment primary lung cancer. The most effective exercise therapy regimen to improve CRF has not been determined. METHODS: In this parallel-group factorial randomized controlled trial, lung cancer survivors with poor CRF (below age-sex sedentary values) were randomly allocated to receive 48 consecutive supervised sessions thrice weekly of (i) aerobic training (AT)-cycle ergometry at 55% to >95% of peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak); (ii) resistance training (RT)-lower and upper extremity exercises at 50-85% of maximal strength; (iii) combination training (CT)-AT plus RT; or (iv) stretching attention control (AC) for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in CRF (VO2 peak, mL O2 ·kg-1 ·min-1 ). Secondary endpoints were body composition, muscle strength, patient-reported outcomes, tolerability (relative dose intensity of exercise), and safety. Analysis of covariance determined change in primary and secondary endpoints from baseline to post-intervention (Week 17) with adjustment for baseline values of the endpoint and other relevant clinical covariates. RESULTS: Ninety patients (65 ± 9 years; 66% female) were randomized (AT, n = 24; RT, n = 23; CT, n = 20; and AC, n = 23) of the planned n = 160. No serious adverse events were observed. For the overall cohort, the lost-to-follow-up rate was 10%. Mean attendance was ≥75% in all groups. In intention-to-treat analysis, VO2 peak increased 1.1 mL O2 ·kg-1 ·min-1 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.0, 2.2, P = 0.04] and 1.4 mL O2 ·kg-1 ·min-1 (95% CI: 0.2, 2.5, P = 0.02) in AT and CT, respectively, compared with AC. There was no difference in VO2 peak change between RT and AC (-0.1 mL O2 ·kg-1 ·min-1 , 95% CI: -1.2, 1.0, P = 0.88). Favourable improvements in maximal strength and body composition were observed in RT and CT groups compared with AT and AC groups (Ps < 0.05). No between-group changes were observed for any patient-reported outcomes. Relative dose intensity of exercise was lower in RT and CT compared with AT (Ps < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the context of a smaller than planned sample size, AT and CT significantly improved VO2 peak in lung cancer survivors; however, the tolerability-to-benefit ratio was superior for AT and hence may be the preferred modality to target impaired CRF in post-treatment lung cancer survivors.