Effect of stent on radiation dosimetry in an in-stent restenosis model.

Purpose: Intravascular brachytherapy is the leading modality being evaluated for treatment of in-stent restenosis. Stent struts may have an effect on the dose distributions of various radiation sources. We evaluated dosimetry in a stented coronary artery model using a variety of beta and gamma sources and stent materials.Methods: We determined the dose distributions with and without stent in the in-stent restenosis model. Three beta-particle emitting radionuclides, 90Y (2.3 MeV), 144Pr (3.0 MeV), and 106Rh (3.5 MeV), and two gamma-ray emitters, 192Ir (380 keV) and 125I (30 keV), were studied. Stent materials included stainless steel, nitinol, and tantalum. Monte Carlo dose calculations were performed in a stent model of multiple stent struts placed at 1.5 mm from the source. Isodose curves were generated and the ratios of dose rates with and without stent, the stent factors, were evaluated. A stent factor of greater or less than unity represents dose enhancement or reduction in the presence of a stent.Results: For the three beta radionuclides, dose reduction was found on the adventitial side of the stent strut and dose enhancement was noted on the luminal side. On the luminal side, the maximum dose enhancement ranges from 7% to 29%, and the dose reduction on the adventitial side ranges from 13% to 43%. Both the reduction and enhancement effects were most pronounced for the high atomic number material, tantalum. For a given stent material, the dose reduction and enhancement are similar for the three beta radionuclides. For the gamma sources, the stent had no effect for the high-energy 192Ir, but for the low-energy 125I, drastic dose reduction on the adventitial side was observed (up to 86% for tantalum stent), and about 10% dose enhancement on the luminal side was also noted. The dose reduction with 125I was more pronounced than that seen with the beta sources.Conclusions: The presence of stent struts significantly affects dose distributions of 90Y, 106Rh, 144Pr, and 125I. The maximum dose reduction can be as much as 86%. 192Ir was unaffected. These factors need to be considered in choosing radionuclides and dose prescriptions in treating in-stent restenosis.

Radiotherapy-Associated Anemia: The Scope of the Problem.

The impact of anemia on cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy is well established, but only recently has the prevalence of anemia in patients receiving radiotherapy received much attention. Many cancer patients present with anemia prior to radiotherapy, and even more experience anemia or a worsening of anemia at some point during treatment. However, the problem of anemia is often ignored because patients may experience only functional anemia, defined as a hemoglobin level less than 12 g/dl. Unless physiologic anemia (hemoglobin = 8 g/dl) is discovered, efforts to correct anemia are often not made. Because hemoglobin levels <12 g/dl seem to be associated with tumor hypoxia and poorer outcomes of radiotherapy in a number of patient populations, ignoring even modest anemia can result in decreased locoregional control, overall survival, and quality of life (QOL). Because increasing hemoglobin levels 1-2 g/dl is usually easily accomplished, there exists the potential for improving outcomes by paying greater attention to this problem. This article focuses on the prevalence of anemia, particularly functional anemia, and discusses the impact of anemia on locoregional control, overall survival, and QOL.

Brachytherapy and Function Preservation in the Localized Management of Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremity.

Over the past 20 years, it has become evident that limb preservation is possible in the management of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Amputation has been generally replaced by more conservative operations that preserve limb function, followed by radiation therapy. Although external beam irradiation has been the most commonly applied adjuvant, there has been increasing interest in using brachytherapy instead of external beam therapy. The reasons for this tren include the apparent equivalence of local control for properly selected patients using brachytherapy, improved patient convenience, shorter treatment time, and lower cost. A recently published report of a prospective randomized trail shows statistically significant improvement in local control when brachytherapy is added to surgery for high grade sarcomas. The treatment concepts used when using brachytherapy challenge many of the orginal teachings for external beam irradiation with regard to field size, volume irradiated, and the tissues that require treatment in the postoperative setting. This article addresses thse controversies, as well as reviews the evolving role of brachytherapy in the management of soft tissue sarcomas. Issues such as patient selection, integration with other local therapies, and complications are highlighted, and special situations are discussed.