Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Br J Nurs ; 28(19): S30-S36, 2019 Oct 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31647743

ABSTRACT

This article reports the results of a single-site prospective audit evaluating the safety and effectiveness of urokinase (Syner-Kinase®) to restore patency in central venous access devices (CVADs) for cancer patients. CVADs are routinely inserted to allow the safe and timely administration of systemic anti-cancer therapies; therefore, catheter dysfunction can interrupt the treatment schedule and adversely affect patient outcome. The aim was to contribute to the development of evidence-based, standardised, best practice guidelines. Prospective data were collected from all patients (n=22) identified with an occluded CVAD, requiring use of Syner-Kinase to manage a persistent withdrawal occlusion or total occlusion, over a 6-month period. Findings revealed a single administration of Syner-Kinase for catheter occlusion clearance to be effective in 92% of cases. Results suggest that use of the thrombolytic agent is well-tolerated and an effective means of restoring patency for long-term CVADs in cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Neoplasms/therapy , Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator/therapeutic use , Clinical Audit , Equipment Failure , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , State Medicine , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom
4.
Br J Nurs ; 25(8): S4-14, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27126763

ABSTRACT

AIM: to evaluate patient experience following the proactive placement of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). METHOD: all patients with a PICC in situ who had attended the chemotherapy day unit over a period of 15 weeks were invited to complete a self-administered questionnaire. Questions related to: information giving, the degree of pain on insertion and any complications experienced by the patient while the device was in situ. There was also space to allow for free-text comments after each question. RESULTS: the majority of patients felt they received enough information and that the procedure was fully explained. Pain on insertion was largely reported as being minimal, with the few patients who did report the procedure as painful also reporting there being difficulty with the insertion. Complication rates were low, the main complication reported was mechanical owing to difficulty with blood withdrawal. CONCLUSION: irrespective of how uncomfortable the patient found the procedure, the majority of patients would recommend proactive PICC insertion to other patients as 'it made the whole process much easier'.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Catheterization, Peripheral/methods , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pain , Patient Preference , Patient Satisfaction , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
6.
Br J Nurs ; 24(8): S36-7, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25904536

ABSTRACT

Florence Nightingale Foundation scholar Karen Harrold received funding to support her PhD exploring the patient experience of saline washout as a management strategy for chemotherapy extravasation. She discusses the focus of her thesis, the completion of phase one and looks ahead to phase two.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Extravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials , Sodium Chloride/chemistry , Humans , Neoplasms/drug therapy
7.
Br J Nurs ; 22(17): S6 -12, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24067273

ABSTRACT

AIMS: This article reviews the efficacy and place in therapy of dexrazoxane (Savene®) for the treatment of anthracycline extravasation, highlighting the lack of inclusion of Savene in most UK cancer network and organisational treatment guidelines. Here we offer advice to nurses on making a case to ensure the availability of Savene. KEY FINDINGS: In 2010, the UK National Extravasation Information Service (NEXIS) green card scheme reported that anthracyclines were the second most common agent involved in extravasations, but they carry the greatest risk to the patient because of their potentially serious consequences. Anthracycline extravasations therefore require prompt and effective treatment. Due to the infrequent occurrence of anthracycline extravasations, their accidental nature and ethical considerations, conducting randomised controlled clinical trials in this therapy area is not possible. As treatment decisions should always be made on patient-specific factors, health professionals need to demonstrate the rationale for choosing a particular course of action when presented with an anthracycline extravasation, especially when we are moving into an era of increased medical litigation. There are several possible treatment options, some of which require demonstrable local core competencies in order to be considered for a particular patient. Based on the available evidence, Savene-the only licensed antidote-is recommended as an effective management strategy for anthracycline extravasation and should be made available in all settings where chemotherapy is administered. However, a high percentage of nurses administering chemotherapy still do not have access to Savene, as it has not been included in their local guidelines for the management of extravasations. Thus, in a large part of the UK, this important treatment option is not available, leaving a significant unmet need (Figure 1). CONCLUSIONS: As nurses play a key role in the prevention, detection, and management of extravasations, they should also assume a key role in ensuring that their local protocols include all appropriate management strategies. Where appropriate, if Savene is not included in the treatment guidelines, nurses should feel empowered to encourage their trust and Specialist Commissioning Groups (SCGs) to make it available, and thus minimise the serious risks associated with anthracycline extravasations.


Subject(s)
Anthracyclines/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Dexrazoxane/therapeutic use , Extravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials/drug therapy , Extravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials/nursing , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Oncology Nursing/standards , Topoisomerase II Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Extravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials/prevention & control , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Factors , United Kingdom
8.
Eur J Cancer ; 44(6): 781-90, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18331788

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is dose-limiting and the most common cumulative toxicity associated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). It can cause considerable discomfort and lead to therapy interruption. Numerous approaches to HFS management have been reported, but there is no consensus. METHODS: Published literature (identified via Medline and internet search) and expert experience regarding HFS and its pathogenesis, incidence, risk factors, prevention and treatment in patients undergoing treatment with PLD were collected and reviewed by a panel of experts. A consensus technique was used to develop recommendations. FINDINGS: The pathogenesis of PLD-associated HFS has been recently elucidated. Systems used to grade, prevent and treat HFS in individuals treated with PLD vary widely. A randomised clinical study demonstrated that PLD dose intensity reduction can prevent HFS. While there is limited literature support, patient education and supportive measures were endorsed by the expert panel as effective strategies for HFS prevention and treatment. An easy to use HFS grading and management algorithm was developed, early signs and symptoms of HFS outlined and specific recommendations for supportive care developed. INTERPRETATION: The paucity of data on the management of PLD-associated HFS led the expert panel to develop consensus-based recommendations. Patient education and supportive measures are important elements in the management of HFS and dose intensity reduction has documented efficacy in prevention. At a PLD dose intensity not exceeding 10mg/m(2) weekly, HFS can be easily managed. Phase III research to support the efficacy other interventions is lacking.


Subject(s)
Doxorubicin/analogs & derivatives , Drug Eruptions/etiology , Erythema/chemically induced , Foot Dermatoses/chemically induced , Hand Dermatoses/chemically induced , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Polyethylene Glycols/adverse effects , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/adverse effects , Drug Eruptions/therapy , Erythema/therapy , Foot Dermatoses/therapy , Hand Dermatoses/therapy , Humans , Hypothermia, Induced/methods , Patient Education as Topic , Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Pyridoxine/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Risk Factors , Syndrome
9.
Eur J Oncol Nurs ; 11(3): 238-46, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17350337

ABSTRACT

Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) or hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a relatively common side effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Many cytotoxic drugs have been reported to cause the condition but it is more frequently associated with 5 fluorouracil (5FU), liposomal doxorubicin and cytarabine. The oral 5FU precursor, capecitabine is frequently associated with PPE and with the recent extension of its use to adjuvant treatment, the incidence of PPE is likely to increase. The initial symptoms are dysesthesia and tingling in the palms, fingers and soles of feet and erythema, which may progress to burning pain with dryness, cracking, desquamation, ulceration and oedema. Palms of the hands are more frequently affected than soles of the feet. This condition is painful and distressing to patients and in some incidences it results in patients not being able to work or perform normal daily activities. It can also result in treatment interruptions which impact on the efficacy of the treatment regimen. Effective and appropriate patient education from a specialist nurse prior to treatment is an essential part of patient management which will facilitate early identification of the symptoms and therefore prevent treatment delays and PPE progression. This article reviews current knowledge of the condition, including classification, and discussion of the findings of a clinical audit in a cancer centre. It includes the incidence, grading, management and impact of PPE on normal daily activities.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Erythema/chemically induced , Foot Dermatoses/chemically induced , Hand Dermatoses/chemically induced , Paresthesia/chemically induced , Activities of Daily Living , Cancer Care Facilities , Cryotherapy , Cytarabine/adverse effects , Doxorubicin/adverse effects , Drug Monitoring/nursing , England/epidemiology , Erythema/epidemiology , Erythema/therapy , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Foot Dermatoses/epidemiology , Foot Dermatoses/therapy , Hand Dermatoses/epidemiology , Hand Dermatoses/therapy , Humans , Incidence , Nurse's Role , Nursing Assessment , Nursing Audit , Nursing Evaluation Research , Oncology Nursing , Paresthesia/epidemiology , Paresthesia/therapy , Patient Education as Topic , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Skin Care/methods , Skin Care/nursing , Syndrome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...