Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 30
Filter
1.
Pediatr Neurol ; 156: 119-127, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38761643

ABSTRACT

Fetal cerebral ventriculomegaly is one of the most common fetal neurological disorders identified prenatally by neuroimaging. The challenges in the evolving landscape of conditions like fetal cerebral ventriculomegaly involve accurate diagnosis and how best to provide prenatal counseling regarding prognosis as well as postnatal management and care of the infant. The purpose of this narrative review is to discuss the literature on fetal ventriculomegaly, including postnatal management and neurodevelopmental outcome, and to provide practice recommendations for pediatric neurologists.


Subject(s)
Hydrocephalus , Humans , Hydrocephalus/diagnostic imaging , Hydrocephalus/diagnosis , Pregnancy , Neurologists/standards , Fetal Diseases/diagnosis , Female , Prenatal Diagnosis/standards , Pediatrics/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards
2.
BMC Pediatr ; 22(1): 285, 2022 05 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35578214

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Early developmental impairment (EDI) is common and has many aetiologies and, therefore, potential investigations. There are several published guidelines recommending aetiological investigations, and paediatricians' views of them varies. Little is known on the thought processes underlying clinical decisions in investigating EDI. This study aimed to describe the thought processes affecting clinical decisions on the investigation of EDI within a nationalised health care system. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured qualitative interviews performed in person or via video link with paediatricians who see children with EDI in England. As part of the interview, a case study of a fictional disease, Cavorite deficiency, modelled on biotinidase deficiency, was given to participants with the cost of testing, incidence and likelihood it would respond to treatment. This allowed exploration of cost without encumbrance from predisposing views and training on the condition. Thematic analysis was performed by iterative approach. Where participants stated they wanted to redirect money from investigations to treatment, were that even possible, we asked which services they would like to be better funded in their area. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 14 consultant paediatricians: 9 Community / Neurodisability, 2 General paediatricians, and 3 Paediatric Neurologists. Two themes were identified: the value of an aetiological diagnosis to families and managing risk and probability when investigating EDI. The latter contained 4 subthemes: 'circumspection' involved blanket investigations chosen irrespective of phenotype and high regard for guidelines; 'accepting appropriate risk' involved participants choosing investigations based on clinical phenotype, recognising some aetiologies would be missed; consultants found they 'transitioned between practices' during their career; and 'improved practice' was thought possible with better evidence on how to stratify investigations based on phenotype. Services that were most frequently reported to need additional funding were therapy services, early community developmental services, management of behaviour, sleep and mental health, and educational support. CONCLUSIONS: There are many factors that influence paediatricians' choice of aetiological investigation in EDI, but clinical factors are the most important. Paediatricians want better evidence to allow them to select the right investigations for each child without a significant risk of missing an important diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Developmental Disabilities , Pediatricians , Child , Humans , Mental Health , Qualitative Research , United Kingdom
3.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 64(1): 14-22, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34423423

ABSTRACT

Prospective parents whose fetus is diagnosed with a neurological anomaly go through a complex range of emotions. They describe their discussions of antenatal counselling from health care professionals as focusing too much on the nature of the anomaly involving unintelligible medical terminology, when what they really want is a picture of the best- and worst-case scenarios. Whilst information on the level of risk for their fetus is important, it is not the parents' primary concern. When statistics for risk are given, they may not be as well understood as the health care professionals think. This review discusses the published evidence on antenatal counselling and recommendations for explaining risk to parents of fetuses with neurological anomalies. From this data we make recommendations for the organization of antenatal counselling services.


Subject(s)
Brain/abnormalities , Counseling , Nervous System Malformations/diagnostic imaging , Parents/psychology , Prenatal Diagnosis , Emotions , Female , Humans , Pregnancy
4.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 64(1): 23-39, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34482539

ABSTRACT

After diagnosis of a fetal neurological anomaly, prospective parents want to know the best and worst-case scenarios and an estimation of the risk to their infant of having an atypical developmental outcome. The literature on developmental outcomes for fetal neurological anomalies is poor: studies are characterized by retrospective design, small sample size, often no standardized assessment of development, and differing definitions of anomalies. This review provides an aide-memoir on the risks of adverse neurodevelopmental outcome for ventriculomegaly, cortical anomalies, microcephaly, macrocephaly, agenesis of the corpus callosum, posterior fossa anomalies, and myelomeningocele, to assist healthcare professionals in counselling. The data in this review should be used alongside recommendations on counselling and service design described in part 1 to provide antenatal counselling.


Subject(s)
Brain/abnormalities , Nervous System Malformations/diagnostic imaging , Prenatal Diagnosis , Counseling , Female , Humans , Parents , Pregnancy
5.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 63(8): 976-983, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33913148

ABSTRACT

AIM: To explore the attitudes of paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) health care professionals towards diagnosis and neurophysiological monitoring of seizures. METHOD: This study used an explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach, interconnecting quantitative and qualitative features, comprising questionnaires and interviews, with equal weighting between stages, of health care professionals working in UK PICUs. Interview data were analysed using thematic analysis and triangulated with questionnaire data. RESULTS: Seventy-two questionnaires were returned: 49 out of 60 (71.0%) of respondents reported that seizures were extremely hard or somewhat hard to diagnose in a critically ill child, and 81.2% had seen misdiagnosis occur. Thematic analysis revealed two main themes: (1) feeling out of control when faced with 'grey areas'; and (2) regaining control, which compromised three subthemes: aggressive intervention, accurate diagnosis, and eschewing diagnosis. INTERPRETATION: Health care professionals find accurate diagnosis of seizures difficult, particularly in sedated/paralysed children and those with chronic neurological disorders. They report they would like better educational opportunities on discriminating between epileptic and non-epileptic events to improve their confidence. Professionals want routine neurophysiological monitoring that can be applied and interpreted at the bedside throughout the day to regain a sense of control over their patient, direct treatment appropriately, and, potentially, improve outcomes, but report appropriate training and peer review are essential if it is to be introduced into routine care. What this study adds Paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) staff feel out of control when faced with diagnosing seizures. Neurophysiological monitoring is wanted to help diagnosis and treatment. Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography is the preferred, pragmatic tool by PICU staff.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Personnel , Neurophysiological Monitoring , Seizures/diagnosis , Critical Illness , Electroencephalography , Humans , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Seizures/physiopathology , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
BMC Pediatr ; 20(1): 36, 2020 01 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31992265

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neonatal seizures are difficult to diagnose and, when they are, tradition dictates first line treatment is phenobarbital. There is little data on how consultants diagnose neonatal seizures, choose when to treat or how they choose aetiological investigations or drug treatments. The purpose of this study was to assess the variation across the UK in the management of neonatal seizures and explore paediatricians' views on their diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: An explanatory sequential mixed methods approach was used (QUAN→QUAL) with equal waiting between stages. We collected quantitative data from neonatology staff and paediatric neurologists using a questionnaire sent to neonatal units and via emails from the British Paediatric Neurology Association. We asked for copies of neonatal unit guidelines on the management of seizures. The data from questionnaires was used to identify16 consultants using semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to interpret qualitative data, which was triangulated with quantitative questionnaire data. RESULTS: One hundred questionnaires were returned: 47.7% thought levetiracetam was as, or equally, effective as phenobarbital; 9.2% thought it was less effective. 79.6% of clinicians had seen no side effects in neonates with levetiracetam. 97.8% of unit guidelines recommended phenobarbital first line, with wide variation in subsequent drug choice, aetiological investigations, and advice on when to start treatment. Thematic analysis revealed three themes: 'Managing uncertainty with neonatal seizures', 'Moving practice forward' and 'Multidisciplinary team working'. Consultants noted collecting evidence on anti-convulsant drugs in neonates is problematic, and recommended a number of solutions, including collaboration to reach consensus guidelines, to reduce diagnostic and management uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in the management of neonatal seizures and clinicians face many uncertainties. Our data has helped reveal some of the reasons for current practice and decision making. Suggestions to improve certainty include: educational initiatives to improve the ability of neonatal staff to describe suspicious events, greater use of video, closer working between neonatologists and neurologists, further research, and a national discussion to reach a consensus on a standardised approach to managing neonatal epileptic seizures.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Seizures/therapy , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Attitude of Health Personnel , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures , Electroencephalography , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/therapy , Interviews as Topic , Levetiracetam/adverse effects , Levetiracetam/therapeutic use , Neonatologists , Patient Care Team , Pediatricians , Phenobarbital/therapeutic use , Seizures/complications , Seizures/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom
7.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health ; 4(2): 131-140, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31786091

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In utero MRI (iuMRI) detects fetal brain abnormalities more accurately than ultrasonography and provides additional clinical information in around half of pregnancies. We aimed to study whether postnatal neuroimaging after age 6 months changes the diagnostic accuracy of iuMRI and its ability to predict developmental outcome. METHODS: Families enrolled in the MERIDIAN study whose child survived to age 3 years were invited to have a case note review and assessment of developmental outcome with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, or both. A paediatric neuroradiologist, masked to the iuMRI results, reviewed the postnatal neuroimaging if the clinical report differed from iuMRI findings. Diagnostic accuracy was recalculated. A paediatric neurologist and neonatologist categorised participants' development as normal, at risk, or abnormal, and the ability of iuMRI and ultrasonography to predict developmental outcome were assessed. FINDINGS: 210 participants had case note review, of whom 81 (39%) had additional investigations after age 6 months. The diagnostic accuracy of iuMRI remained higher than ultrasonography (proportion of correct cases was 529 [92%] of 574 vs 387 [67%] of 574; absolute difference 25%, 95% CI 21 to 29; p<0·0001). Developmental outcome data were analysed in 156 participants, and 111 (71%) were categorised as normal or at risk. Of these 111 participants, prognosis was normal or favourable for 56 (51%) using ultrasonography and for 76 (69%) using iuMRI (difference in specificity 18%, 95% CI 7 to 29; p=0·0008). No statistically significant difference was seen in infants with abnormal outcome (difference in sensitivity 4%, 95% CI -10 to 19; p=0·73). INTERPRETATION: iuMRI remains the optimal tool to identify fetal brain abnormalities. It is less accurate when used to predict developmental outcome, although better than ultrasonography for identifying children with normal outcome. Further work is needed to determine how the prognostic abilities of iuMRI can be improved. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.


Subject(s)
Brain/diagnostic imaging , Fetal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Brain/embryology , Child, Preschool , Early Diagnosis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
8.
BMC Pediatr ; 19(1): 349, 2019 10 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31607269

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Newborn screening has enabled the early diagnosis of Glutaric aciduria type 1, with the possibility of improving neurological outcomes in affected children. Achieving those outcomes requires parents to effectively manage their child's condition by adherence to a strict dietary regime and responding to situations that may trigger decompensation. The specific information and support needs of this group of parents are unknown. METHODS: A focus group with five parents was conducted to gain insights into the information that parents needed and the ways in which they accessed and used information to manage their child's condition. A topic guide was used to direct the discussion which was recorded and fully transcribed. All participants gave informed consent. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, a structured approach that contributes to transparency and validity of results while allowing the integration of predetermined and emerging themes. To ensure rigour, two researchers were involved in initial coding of data and key analytic decisions. RESULTS: Two main themes were identified. 'Understanding the condition' explored parent's needs to understand the scientific complexity of the condition and to be aware of the worst case scenario associated with loss of metabolic control. 'Managing the condition' explained how parents co-ordinated and controlled the involvement of other carers and parents' need to be active partners in medical management to feel in control of the situation. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the importance of addressing parents' initial and ongoing informational needs so they can fulfil their role and protect their child from metabolic harm.


Subject(s)
Access to Information , Amino Acid Metabolism, Inborn Errors , Brain Diseases, Metabolic , Caregivers , Glutaryl-CoA Dehydrogenase/deficiency , Parents , Adolescent , Amino Acid Metabolism, Inborn Errors/therapy , Brain Diseases, Metabolic/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male
9.
Health Technol Assess ; 23(49): 1-144, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31538569

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography has been the mainstay of antenatal screening programmes in the UK for many years. Technical factors and physical limitations may result in suboptimal images that can lead to incorrect diagnoses and inaccurate counselling and prognostic information being given to parents. Previous studies suggest that the addition of in utero magnetic resonance imaging (iuMRI) may improve diagnostic accuracy for fetal brain abnormalities. These studies have limitations, including a lack of an outcome reference diagnosis (ORD), which means that improvements could not be assessed accurately. OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic impact, acceptability and cost consequence of iuMRI among fetuses with a suspected fetal brain abnormality. DESIGN: A pragmatic, prospective, multicentre, cohort study with a health economics analysis and a sociological substudy. SETTING: Sixteen UK fetal medicine centres. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women aged ≥ 16 years carrying a fetus (at least 18 weeks' gestation) with a suspected brain abnormality detected on ultrasonography. INTERVENTIONS: Participants underwent iuMRI and the findings were reported to their referring fetal medicine clinician. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancy outcome was followed up and an ORD from postnatal imaging or postmortem autopsy/imaging collected when available. Developmental data from the Bayley Scales of Infant Development and questionnaires were collected from the surviving infants aged 2-3 years. Data on the management of the pregnancy before and after the iuMRI were collected to inform the economic evaluation. Two surveys collected data on patient acceptability of iuMRI and qualitative interviews with participants and health professionals were undertaken. RESULTS: The primary analysis consisted of 570 fetuses. The absolute diagnostic accuracies of ultrasonography and iuMRI were 68% and 93%, respectively [a difference of 25%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 21% to 29%]. The difference between ultrasonography and iuMRI increased with gestational age. In the 18-23 weeks group, the figures were 70% for ultrasonography and 92% for iuMRI (difference of 23%, 95% CI 18% to 27%); in the ≥ 24 weeks group, the figures were 65% for ultrasonography and 94% for iuMRI (difference of 29%, 95% CI 23% to 36%). Patient acceptability was high, with at least 95% of respondents stating that they would have iuMRI again in a similar situation. Health professional interviews suggested that iuMRI was acceptable to clinicians and that iuMRI was useful as an adjunct to ultrasonography, but not as a replacement. Across a range of scenarios, iuMRI resulted in additional costs compared with ultrasonography alone. The additional cost was consistently < £600 per patient and the cost per management decision appropriately changed was always < £3000. There is potential for reporting bias from the referring clinicians on the diagnostic and prognostic outcomes. Lower than anticipated follow-up rates at 3 years of age were observed. CONCLUSIONS: iuMRI as an adjunct to ultrasonography significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy and confidence for the detection of fetal brain abnormalities. An evaluation of the use of iuMRI for cases of isolated microcephaly and the diagnosis of fetal spine abnormalities is recommended. Longer-term follow-up studies of children diagnosed with fetal brain abnormalities are required to fully assess the functional significance of the diagnoses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN27626961. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 49. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.


Ultrasonography is routine in pregnancy to check that the baby's brain is developing as expected. However, no medical test is perfect and ultrasonography may miss some brain abnormalities, may get some brain abnormalities wrong or may diagnose an abnormality that is not really present. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may help clarify difficult cases during pregnancy. We wanted to find out if MRI was better than ultrasonography alone in making an accurate diagnosis. We recruited pregnant women whose ultrasound scan, performed by an expert, suggested that their baby had a brain abnormality, and referred them for a MRI scan. The results of the two tests were compared with each other and to the final outcome of the pregnancy. Our results showed that using MRI in addition to ultrasonography improved the accuracy of the diagnosis in about one in four pregnancies. It changed the prediction of how the baby would develop in at least one in five cases. In many cases, the pregnancy was managed differently because of the MRI result. The MRI was acceptable to women, with 95% saying that they would have MRI again in a similar situation. Neither MRI nor ultrasonography accurately identified children who went on to have delayed development at the age of 2­3 years, but MRI was better than ultrasonography at ruling out developmental problems at this age. The MRI cost more than ultrasonography alone; therefore, whether or not it is worthwhile depends on the value placed on the decisions that changed as a result of its use.


Subject(s)
Brain/abnormalities , Fetus/abnormalities , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Fetus/diagnostic imaging , Gestational Age , Health Care Costs , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/economics , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Pregnancy , Prenatal Diagnosis/economics , Reproducibility of Results , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
10.
JIMD Rep ; 48(1): 36-44, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31392111

ABSTRACT

N-carbamoyl-l-glutamate (NCG), the N-acetyl-l-glutamate analogue used to treat N-acetylglutamate synthase deficiency, has been proposed as potential therapy of carbamoyl phosphate synthetase 1 deficiency (CPS1D). Previous findings in five CPS1D patients suggest that NCG-responsiveness could be mutation-specific. We report on a patient with CPS1D, homozygous for the novel p.(Pro1211Arg) CPS1 mutation, who presented at 9 days of life with hyperammonemic coma which was successfully treated with emergency measures. He remained metabolically stable on merely oral NCG, arginine, and modest protein restriction. Ammonia scavengers were only added after poor dietary compliance following solid food intake at age 1 year. The patient received a liver transplantation at 3.9 years of age, having normal cognitive, motor, and quality of life scores despite repeated but successfully treated episodes of hyperammonemia. Studies using recombinantly produced mutant CPS1 confirmed the partial nature of the CPS1D triggered by the p.(Pro1211Arg) mutation. This mutation decreased the solubility and yield of CPS1 as expected for increased tendency to misfold, and reduced the thermal stability, maximum specific activity (V max; ~2-fold reduction), and apparent affinity (~5-fold reduction) for ATP of the purified enzyme. By increasing the saturation of the NAG site in vivo, NCG could stabilize CPS1 and minimize the decrease in the effective affinity of the enzyme for ATP. These observations, together with prior experience, support the ascertainment of clinical responsiveness to NCG in CPS1 deficient patients, particularly when decreased stability or lowered affinity for NAG of the mutant enzyme are suspected or proven.

11.
Eur Radiol ; 28(10): 4438-4446, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29713778

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: MR imaging of neonates is difficult for many reasons and a major factor is safe transport to the MR facilities. In this article we describe the use of a small, investigational 3-T MR customised for brain imaging and sited on a neonatal unit of a tertiary centre in the UK, which is in contrast to a 300-m journey to the whole-body MR scanner used at present for clinical cases. METHODS: We describe our methods for preparing babies for safe transport and scanning on an investigational 3-T MR scanner on a neonatal unit and the development of appropriate MR sequences. The MR scanner does not have CE marking at present so this early development work was undertaken on normal neonates whose parents consented to a research examination. RESULTS: Fifty-two babies were scanned and there were no serious adverse events. The MR examinations were considered to be diagnostically evaluable in all 52 cases and in 90% the imaging was considered to be at least as good as the quality obtained on the 1.5-T scanner currently used for clinical cases. CONCLUSION: We have shown that this investigational 3-T MR scanner can be used safely on a neonatal unit and we have refined the MR sequences to a point that they are clinically usable. KEY POINTS: • Access to neonatal MR imaging is limited. • We describe an investigational 3-T MR scanner site on a neonatal unit. • The scanner produces images suitable for clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Brain/diagnostic imaging , Hospital Units , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Transportation of Patients , United Kingdom
12.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 60(9): 884-891, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29675941

ABSTRACT

AIM: To determine whether anticoagulation therapy (ACT) in the treatment of neonatal cerebral sinovenous thrombosis (CSVT) improves outcomes, in the presence or absence of pre-existing intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). METHOD: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, the Web of Science, and clinical trial databases. We considered data from retrospective and prospective cohort studies, case series, and randomized controlled studies evaluating outcomes of CSVT treated with anticoagulation or no anticoagulation. Studies were included if they involved infants either younger than 28 days of age or younger than 44 weeks postmenstrual age at the time of diagnosis of CSVT in which ACT was considered. RESULTS: Seven non-randomized studies were included in meta-analysis. ACT had no significant effect on mortality before discharge either in the presence or absence of pre-existing ICH, nor on the incidence of extension of pre-existing ICH. ACT was associated with a reduced risk of propagation of thrombus (risk ratio 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.72). INTERPRETATION: There are no randomized trials assessing the safety and efficacy of ACT in the treatment of neonatal CSVT. The results of this meta-analysis would justify a position of equipoise and support the need for well-designed randomized controlled trials of ACT in this population. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: No randomized studies have evaluated anticoagulation therapy (ACT) in neonatal cerebral sinovenous thrombosis. ACT may reduce thrombus propagation. No evidence of increased morbidity or mortality with ACT was demonstrated. A position of equipoise is justified, supporting the need for placebo-controlled randomized trials.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Sinus Thrombosis, Intracranial/therapy , Cerebral Hemorrhage/complications , Cerebral Hemorrhage/therapy , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Sinus Thrombosis, Intracranial/complications
13.
Childs Nerv Syst ; 33(12): 2083-2085, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28894924

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cyclical vomiting syndrome is a disorder characterised by recurrent episodes of profuse vomiting. There are no cases in the literature on the management of children with presenting with cyclical vomiting syndrome and a Chiari malformation type I. DISCUSSION: We report the case of a 12-year-old child diagnosed with cyclical vomiting syndrome and a Chiari malformation type I. The patient received symptomatic relief following a craniocervical decompression.


Subject(s)
Arnold-Chiari Malformation/complications , Arnold-Chiari Malformation/diagnostic imaging , Vomiting/diagnostic imaging , Vomiting/etiology , Arnold-Chiari Malformation/surgery , Child , Decompression, Surgical/methods , Humans , Male , Vomiting/surgery
15.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ; 102(4): F346-F358, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28389438

ABSTRACT

This review discusses an approach to determining the cause of neonatal encephalopathy, as well as current evidence on resuscitation and subsequent management of hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). Encephalopathy in neonates can be due to varied aetiologies in addition to hypoxic-ischaemia. A combination of careful history, examination and the judicious use of investigations can help determine the cause. Over the last 7 years, infants with moderate to severe HIE have benefited from the introduction of routine therapeutic hypothermia; the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome is 7 (95% CI 5 to 10). More recent research has focused on optimal resuscitation practices for babies with cardiorespiratory depression, such as delayed cord clamping after establishment of ventilation and resuscitation in air. Around a quarter of infants with asystole at 10 min after birth who are subsequently cooled have normal outcomes, suggesting that individualised decision making on stopping resuscitation is needed, based on access to intensive treatment unit and early cooling. The full benefit of cooling appears to have been exploited in our current treatment protocols of 72 hours at 33.5°C; deeper and longer cooling showed adverse outcome. The challenge over the next 5-10 years will be to assess which adjunct therapies are safe and optimise hypothermic brain protection in phase I and phase II trials. Optimal care may require tailoring treatments according to gender, genetic risk, injury severity and inflammatory status.


Subject(s)
Asphyxia Neonatorum/complications , Developmental Disabilities/prevention & control , Hypothermia, Induced/methods , Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain/therapy , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Male , Treatment Outcome
17.
Epileptic Disord ; 17(3): 349, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26235822

ABSTRACT

Brief rhythmic discharges (BRDs) are paroxysms of rhythmic electrographic activity with an amplitude of >2 µV and a duration of <10 seconds. Although BRDs are reported in neonates, this electrographic activity contrasts the accepted definition of neonatal seizures (duration of >10 seconds). BRDs are associated with background EEG abnormalities as well as increased morbidity and mortality (Oliveira et al., 2000, Nagarajan et al., 2011), and appear to be more closely related to formal neonatal seizures than post-neonatal epilepsy (Nagarajan et al., 2011). Most neonatal units are restricted to one-hour recordings, and if BRDs are observed without any accompanying electrographic seizures, then the neonate should be regarded as being at high risk of seizures and repeat recordings should be considered.


Subject(s)
Infant, Newborn, Diseases/diagnosis , Seizures/diagnosis , Biomarkers , Electroencephalography , Humans , Infant, Newborn
18.
Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed ; 100(5): 226-32, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25824891

ABSTRACT

Most neonatal epileptic seizures are provoked by an underlying condition or problem-'acute symptomatic seizures'. However, a few neonatal epilepsy syndromes exist, and these are defined by the constellation of seizure types, EEG findings and family history seen. Making an accurate diagnosis of an epilepsy syndrome can help direct investigations, treatment options and provide prognostic information. This article discusses the investigative approach and treatments for neonatal epileptic seizures, including the neonatal epilepsy syndromes.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/administration & dosage , Seizures/diagnosis , Seizures/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Disease Progression , Electroencephalography/methods , Epilepsy, Benign Neonatal/diagnosis , Epilepsy, Benign Neonatal/drug therapy , Epilepsy, Benign Neonatal/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Prognosis , Risk Assessment , Seizures/epidemiology , Seizures/etiology , Syndrome , Treatment Outcome
19.
Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed ; 100(4): 170-5, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25824893

ABSTRACT

The neonatal period is the most frequent time of life to have epileptic seizures. However, neonates can also exhibit unusual movements that are not epileptic seizures. Differentiating between epileptic and non-epileptic movements can be difficult. Many neonatal seizures exhibit few or no clinical features at all. This article is for the benefit of paediatric trainees and reviews the published evidence on which neonatal movements are likely to be epileptic seizures and which are not. We also discuss epileptic seizure classification.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy/diagnosis , Muscle Rigidity/diagnosis , Myoclonus/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Epilepsy/classification , Humans , Infant, Newborn
20.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 57(7): 600-610, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25495611

ABSTRACT

In comparison to hypotonia, hypertonia is less commonly expressed in the neonatal period. The scientific literature on the causes of neonatal hypertonia is scant, with no suggested diagnostic algorithm easily available to clinicians. Aetiologies include conditions affecting the central nervous system and spine, and rare peripheral neuromuscular disorders leading to hypertonia. Aetiology onset may be antepartum, peripartum with either transient hypertonia or persistent hypertonia which may appear later, or from a postnatal event/disease. This review discusses neonatal hypertonia and a diagnostic approach to neonatal hypertonia is suggested.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...