Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Genet Couns ; 32(6): 1194-1199, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37974548

ABSTRACT

As the genetic counseling workforce experiences an increase in genetic counselors (GCs) in non-direct patient care roles, it is essential that genetic counseling students are trained in these settings. The Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling (ACGC) standards regarding laboratory exposure have evolved over time, but laboratory fieldwork experience continues to remain a suggestion for a diversified setting. As more trainees seek laboratory exposure and an increasing number of new graduates opt for laboratory positions, learning firsthand from GCs employed in this setting is a valuable experience that should be available to all trainees. Historically, laboratory educational offerings consisted of onsite rotations for students from local training programs focused on understanding diagnostic testing methodologies and shadowing GCs. Through the years, multiple laboratories have expanded their curriculums to expose students to variant interpretation and report writing, research, client services, marketing, and product development. Alongside the growth of laboratory rotation curriculum grew opportunities for remote rotations. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, GeneDx offered remote education options including both individualized rotations and a webinar series. These offerings expanded due to the pandemic coupled with increased demand and have positive implications for future trainees. The evolution of the rotation also included conscious efforts to incorporate diversity, equity, and inclusion into the curriculum, as well as to improved accessibility to laboratory rotations. Notably, there are inconsistencies in laboratory rotation curricula and requirements, and a standardized evaluation and definition of competencies are lacking. ACGC guidelines defining common core concepts required from laboratory rotations would help ensure students receive an equitable minimum skill set, regardless of training site. Stakeholders in GC education should collaborate to enhance the experiences of future trainees and provide the skills needed by a workforce shifting to remote work and increasing numbers of non-direct patient-facing laboratory roles. Drawing upon our years of experience, GeneDx aims to actively contribute to discussions around these questions. Alongside other laboratories and training programs, we hope to foster further innovation surrounding the training needs of our future GC colleagues. This educational innovation illustrates an approach to helping genetic counseling students achieve competencies related to lab-based roles.


Subject(s)
Counselors , Genetic Counseling , Humans , Laboratories , Pandemics , Counselors/education , Workforce
2.
Acad Forensic Pathol ; 12(4): 129-139, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36545303

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Postmortem genetic testing (PMGT) can provide valuable information about an individual's cause of death and potentially allow at-risk relatives to discern their risks for inherited cardiac disease. Postmortem genetic testing is most often successful with certain specimens. Methods: Investigators collected data on postmortem referrals to GeneDx, LLC for PMGT. Orders were reviewed and stratified based on provider, specimen type, and tests ordered. Discussion: This cohort included 601 deceased individuals referred for PMGT with a total of 673 genetic tests ordered from 247 different providers. The most common test categories ordered were arrhythmia (33.4%) and cardiomyopathy (29.3%). A likely pathogenic or pathogenic genetic variant was identified in approximately 15% of patients. Blood in EDTA was received for 21.6% of patients with a 95% success rate for completion of all test components. Blood samples in EDTA were most successful in completing PMGT, but sequencing was still successful in the majority of suboptimal specimens. Conclusion: The use of PMGT is increasing. Obtaining optimal samples (blood in EDTA) is important for successful completion of genetic testing. Obstacles may still exist for obtaining and storing ideal specimens. Continued efforts are needed for education and awareness around appropriate specimen types, storage and shipping of specimens, DNA banking, and overall availability of PMGT. In addition, access to resources such as supplies, proper storage conditions, DNA banking, and PMGT will allow for more opportunities to complete testing.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...