Factors impacting the solo remote placement experiences of undergraduate James Cook University medical students: A mixed-methods pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors impacting the experiences of James Cook University medical students on solo placements in remote towns. DESIGN: This 2018 pilot study used an exploratory sequential mixed-methods approach to explore the recent solo remote placement experiences of James Cook University medical students. Qualitative interviews were performed initially to elicit context sensitive themes for the self administered survey. The survey went on to use Likert-scale questions in addition to pre-validated survey instruments. SETTING: Focus groups and interviews took place at James Cook University Medical School in Townsville in late 2018 after students returned from their rural rotation. Two telephone interviews were conducted for Year 6 students unable to attend the focus groups. PARTICIPANTS: James Cook University medical students in years 2, 4 and 6 students who experienced a solo placement in a remote (MMM 6 or 7) town during 2017 or 2018 were invited to be part of the study. Only Townsville-based students were involved. A total of 14 students participated in the focus groups (n = 14) and a further 31 students completed the survey (n = 31). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Interviews identified themes negatively or positively impacting solo remote placement experience, while bivariate analysis identified factors associated with having an 'excellent' overall experience. RESULTS: Student interviews identified five main themes impacting student experience in remote communities: culture of the medical facility; quality and quantity of clinical experiences; quality of accommodation; placement length; and community infrastructure and services. Negative impacts could result in students experiencing social isolation. Students reporting an 'excellent' solo remote placement experience in the survey were more likely to have: felt very welcome in the community; felt the health staff supported them; heavily involved themselves in clinical activities; enjoyed the experiences remote communities can offer; positive rural career intentions; reported they 'bounce back during and after life's most stressful events'; and come from a rural or remote hometown. CONCLUSIONS: Solo remote placements provide medical students with opportunities to further knowledge, clinical capabilities, social experiences and careers, but can have negative aspects. However, negative aspects are often modifiable management issues or can potentially be avoided if prospective students are better informed of the challenges associated with remote communities.

Prevocational Integrated Extended Rural Clinical Experience (PIERCE): cutting through the barriers to prevocational rural medical education.

INTRODUCTION: Despite an increase in the number of undergraduate training positions, Australia faces a critical shortage of medical practitioners in regional, rural and remote communities. Extended rural clinical placements have shown great utility in undergraduate medical curricula, increasing training capacity and providing comparable educational outcomes while promoting rural medicine as a career. The Prevocational Integrated Extended Rural Clinical Experience (PIERCE) was developed to increase the training capacity of the Queensland Rural Generalist Pathway (QRGP) and strengthen trainee commitment to rural practice by offering an authentic, extended 15-week rural term that provided an integrated experience in anaesthetics, obstetrics and gynaecology, and paediatrics, while meeting the requirements for satisfactory completion of prevocational rural generalist training. This study sought to evaluate whether trainees believed PIERCE and/or traditional regional hospital specialty placements achieved their learning objectives and to identify elements of the placements that contributed to, or were a barrier to, their realisation. METHODS: This translational qualitative study explored the experiences and perceptions of QRGP trainees who undertook a PIERCE placement in three Queensland rural hospitals (Mareeba, Proserpine and Stanthorpe) in 2015, with a matched cohort of trainees who undertook regional hospital placements in anaesthetics, obstetrics and gynaecology, and paediatrics at a regional referral hospital (Cairns, Mackay and Toowoomba base hospitals). The study used a realist evaluation framework that investigates What works, for whom, in what circumstances, in what respects and why? RESULTS: PIERCE provided an enjoyable and valued rural training experience that promoted trainee engagement with, and contribution to, a rural community of practice, reinforcing their commitment to a career in rural medicine. However, QRGP trainees did not accept that PIERCE could be a substitute for regional hospital experience in anaesthetics, obstetrics and gynaecology, and paediatrics. Rather, trainees thought PIERCE and regional hospital placements offered complementary experiences. PIERCE offered integrated, hands-on rural clinical experience in which trainees had more autonomy and responsibility. Regional hospital placements offered more traditional caseload learning experiences based on observation and the handing down of knowledge and skills by hospital-based supervisors. CONCLUSION: Both PIERCE and regional hospital placements provided opportunities and threats to the attainment of the curriculum objectives of the Australian Curriculum Framework for Junior Doctors, the Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine and the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners Fellowship in Advanced Rural General Practice curricula. PIERCE trainees enjoyed the opportunity to experience rural medicine in a community setting, a broad caseload, hands-on proficiency, continuity of care and an authentic role as a valued member of the clinical team. This was reinforced by closer and more consistent clinical and educational interactions with their supervisors, and learning experiences that address key weaknesses identified in current hospital-based prevocational training. Successful achievement of prevocational curriculum objectives is contingent on strategic alignment of the curricula with supportive learning mechanisms focused by the learning context on the desired outcome, rural practice. This study adds weight to the growing consensus that rural community-based placements such as PIERCE are desirable components of prevocational training.

Chronic Disease and Health Risk Behaviors Among Rural Agricultural Workforce in Queensland.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known of the lifestyle behaviors and prevalence of chronic disease in the Australian agricultural workforce. This study aimed to assess behavioral risk factors and the prevalence of chronic disease among attendees of agricultural events in rural Queensland. METHODS: Data on lifestyle risk factors and prevalence of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases were collected from participants in four separate cross-sectional studies in rural southern Queensland. Anthropometric measures, blood pressure, serum cholesterol, and glucose levels of consenting participants were assessed by trained medical students under the supervision of rural clinicians. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22 statistical software package and t-tests and chi-square tests were used to compare differences between groups. RESULTS: A total of 702 attendees participated; the majority were agricultural workers (n = 393). Greater psychological distress was reported among participants from these rural communities (42%) than in the Australian population (31%); however, levels of psychological distress was similar between agricultural workers and others in the sample. Fewer people in these agricultural communities reported smoking (10%), and they reported being more active (86%) than the average Australian, but a greater proportion reported high-risk alcohol consumption (53%) and were found to be hypertensive (31%). These findings were accentuated among agricultural workers. CONCLUSION: This method of investigation both raises awareness in the community and identifies health risks for further management in a group that has otherwise been poorly defined. Resident agricultural workers have different health risks and behaviors, though psychological distress appears to be borne across these communities.